Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Martin S Thompson”
Martin v. Thompsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM** Ronnie S. Martin, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm. The district court
State v. Thompsonpublic domain
Cynthia L. Martin, Judge Charles Thompson ("Thompson") appeals from the trial court's judgment convicting him of burglary in the first degree. Thompson claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Thompson also claims that the trial court committed plain error by failing to grant him allocution before pronouncing sentence. Finding no error, we affirm. Factual and Procedural Background
Thompson v. Kemppublic domain
MARTIN, Circuit Judge Nine Georgia voters ("plaintiffs") bring this action challenging Georgia's 2015 redistricting plan as violating the Constitution as well as Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 52 U.S.C. § 10301. First Am. Compl. ("Compl."), Doc. 84 ¶¶ 1, 21-30. The plaintiffs1 ch
State v. Martinpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM Ricco Martin (“Appellant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court following a jury trial in which he was convicted of two counts of attempted first-degree statutory rape, one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, and one count of first-degree child molestation. In his sole point on appeal, Appellant argues that the trial court’s admission of his victim’s out-of-court statements violate
United States v. Thompsonpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Richard A. Greenberg, appointed counsel for Barbara Ann Thompson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because indep
People v. Thompsonpublic domain
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed May 24, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive. Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see
Thompson v. Horowitzpublic domain
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pfau, J.), entered April 16, 2014, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, is in favor of the defendant MFA Construction, Inc., and against her dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant. Ordered that the judgme
State v. Martinpublic domain
Cite as 2017 Ark. 64 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-16-365 STATE OF ARKANSAS Opinion Delivered March 2, 2017 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ST. FRANCIS V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 62CR-15-71] CHRISTO
State v. Thompsonpublic domain
Order Per Curiam Armón Thompson appeals his convictions for second-degree murder and armed criminal action. Thompson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions and the court’s ruling that precluded him from cross-examining a detective about a pending federal investigation against the detective. After a thorough review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the ju
Thompson v. Statepublic domain
359 S.W.3d 507 (2012) Timothy D. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. WD 73389. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 31, 2012. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 28, 2012. S. Kathleen Webber, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Att
Thompson v. Horwitzpublic domain
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant MFA Construction, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pfau, J.), entered January 9, 2012, as denied that branch of the motion of the defendants MFA Construction, Inc., and Martin Horwitz which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it as time-barred, and granted that bran
Thompson v. Horwitzpublic domain
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant MFA Construction, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pfau, J.), entered January 9, 2012, as denied that branch of the motion of the defendants MFA Construction, Inc., and Martin Horwitz which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it as time-barred, and granted that bran
Thompson v. McDonaldpublic domain
PLAGER, Circuit Judge. This is a veterans case. Wade G. Thompson appeals a judgment of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”). The Veterans Court affirmed a decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“Board”) denying Thompson a disability rating in excess of 20% for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine prior to March 8, 2011. The Veterans Court’s dec
United States v. Andre Jenkins Nathaniel S. Thompsonpublic domain
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellees Andre Jenkins and Nathaniel Thompson, charged with possession with intent to distribute cocaine, moved to suppress evidence obtained during two searches. The district court granted the defendants-appellees’ motions, and the government appeals. The government argues that the district court erred in suppressing the evidence, as the evid
Martin v. Statepublic domain
725 S.E.2d 313 (2012) 290 Ga. 901 MARTIN v. The STATE. No. S12A0327. Supreme Court of Georgia. April 24, 2012. *314 Bernard Stephen Brody, for appellant. Patrick H. Head, Dist. Atty., John Richard Edwards, Amelia Greeson Pray, Henry Rance Thompson, Asst. Dist. Attys., Paula Khristian Smith, Senior A
State v. Thompsonpublic domain
336 S.W.3d 211 (2011) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Taqwa H. THOMPSON, Appellant. No. WD 72139. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 29, 2011. Susan E. Summers, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Timothy A. Blackwell, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. *212 Before Division Three: CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, P
United States v. Martinpublic domain
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Following a tip from a confidential informant, law enforcement officers pulled over the vehicle of Nicole Martin on March 28, 2007. A search turned up heroin, cocaine, and oxycodone. Martin was arrested, indicted, and ultimately pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute. At sentencing, relying on two prior felony convictions that Martin had, th
State v. Thompsonpublic domain
361 S.W.3d 46 (2011) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roger Lee THOMPSON, Appellant. No. WD 72164. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. December 6, 2011. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 31, 2012. Application for Transfer Denied April 3, 2012. *47 Laur
Martin v. Thompsonpublic domain
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Martin v. Thompsonpublic domain
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.