Cases

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-09-00061-CV </

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED SCOTT F. GRIM, JEFFREY M. GRIM, February 28, 2025 DARNELL FULKS, CINDY FULKS, ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK BRYAN J. SUTER, and MARTHA J. SUTER, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF W

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-03-043 CV ____________________

OPINION COLE, Circuit Judge. Midland Funding LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc., and Encore Capital Group, Inc., the defendants-appellees, along with four plaintiffs-appellees, Andrea Brent, Martha Vassalle, Jerome Johnson, and Hope Franklin, sought approval in district court of a nationwide class settlement that settled three related lawsuits. The dist

PER CURIAM ORDER. The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case, it is this 15th day of May, 2014 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated and the case is remanded to that Court for further consideration in light of Nalls v. State, 437 Md. 674, 89 A.3d 1126 (2

07-11-00404-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A ------------------------------------------------------

OPINION JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice In two issues, Martha N. Hill and Gary Hill appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment, and its grant of Winnon Earl Sword’s motion for summary judgment determining that his lien against their property was valid and subject to foreclosure. In two issues, the Hills contend that

306 F.Supp.2d 191 (2004) Martha SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF MONROE and Town of Easton, Defendants. No. 3:02 CV1539 (EBB). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 27, 2004. *192 *193 John R. Williams, Williams & Pattis, New Haven, CT, for Plaintiff. John J. Radshaw, I

703 S.E.2d 419 (2010) SCOTT v. WAITS, et al. No. A10A1192. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 18, 2010. *420 Harbin, Hartley & Hawkins, Phillip L. Hartley, Martha M. Pearson, for appellant. William M. Akin, Akin & Tate, for appellees. DOYLE, Judge. Lillian and Charles Waits sued Donnie D. Scott, th

DOYLE, Judge. James Scott appeals after a jury convicted him of one count of forgery. His conviction stems from his attempt to purchase a cell phone with a document made to appear-at a glance-like a $100 bill. However, just to the right of the likeness of Benjamin Franklin on the bill's front, it states in large font: "FOR MOTION PICTURE USE ONLY." Beneath that, in small font, it states

MANSFIELD, Justice. This case requires us to interpret a special restitution law that applies to operating while intoxicated (OWI) cases. This law provides that the court “may order restitution paid to any public agency for the costs of the emergency response resulting from the actions constituting a violation of [the OWI statute].” Iowa Code § 321J.2(13)(6) (2014). Here, an off

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 26 OPINION Introduction and Facts In Carty v. American States Ins. Co. (1992) 7 Cal.App.4th 399, 402-403 [9 Cal.Rptr.2d 1], this court rejected the idea that the words "latent defec

Plaintiff Martha Scott appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of defendant Charles M. Heard. We affirm. On December 27, 1983, Scott and Heard were involved in an automobile accident. Scott filed suit against Heard, alleging that Heard negligently and wantonly allowed the automobile he was driving to collide with Scott's automobile. (The wanton count was later stricken by agreement.) Heard answered, saying that he was not negligent or wanton i

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 23-1373 _____________ MARTHA STRINGER; PAUL STRINGER v. COUNTY OF BUCKS; MR. ANDREW KOVACH; KYLE WYLIE; JENIFER FORMAN; CRYSTAL BIEMULLER; CHRISTINE CUTEO; JACQUELINE TORRES; C.O. PAGONE; C.O. HINES; C.O. STYERS; JOHN DOES 1-20; C.O. MURDOCH; LA

89 F.Supp.2d 1066 (2000) Richard SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. C 98-4098-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. March 30, 2000. Ruth M. Carter, Carter & Tiefenthaler, P.C., Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff. *1067 Martha A. Fagg, Asst. U.S. A

*657MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER BENNETT, Chief Judge This matter comes before the court pursuant to the defendant’s May 30, 2000, motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for relief from this court’s order of March 30, 2000, which became final on April 24, 2000, upon this

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MARTHA ARANA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MARTHA C. CASTRO, Appellant, v. PEOPLE’S TRUST INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D20-1070 [April 28, 2021] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Donald W.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JUAN CARLOS JULIA, Appellant, v. MARTHA JULIA, Appellee. No. 4D17-2261 [January 16, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Edw

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Athey, Chaney and Lorish PUBLISHED Argued by videoconference KEEFE BUTLER OPINION BY v. Record No. 0584-22-2 JUDGE CLIFFORD L. ATHEY, JR. MARCH 28, 2023