Cases

h MURRAY, Judge. Martha and Jack Sands appeal a trial court judgment granting Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing Mr. and Mrs. Sands’ uninsured motorist (“UM”) claim against Prudential. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting Prudential’s motion for summary judgment, apparently finding that Mr. and Mrs. Sands failed to provide an independent

Daniello v Wagner (2023 NY Slip Op 06116) Daniello v Wagner 2023 NY Slip Op 06116 Decided on November 29, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Judgment rendered October 1, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 56,300-CW COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** DANN

DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge. | jPlaintiff Martha Hohensee, appeals a partial summary judgment granted in favor of Raymond C. Bergeron, Jr., and Raymond C. Bergeron, Jr., Architects, *885L.L.C. The ruling dismissed Bergeron from the case in his individual capacity, and dismissed plaintiffs claim against his company insofar as its liability for any construction-related issu

OPINION OF THE COURT BY WHITING, J. After the decision rendered by this Court in this case, Aldrich et al. v. Hassinger et al., page 272 ante, the case went back to the Circuit Court and a bill of revivor was brought in the names of Mary C. Aldrich, Helen B. King, and Norman K. Brown,. a minor, by W. C. King, his next friend, against Priscilla E. Hassinger and others including D. K. Brown as

OPINION OF THE COURT, BY JUDD, C.J. This is a bill of revivor, to bring to a termination an old case in equity to declare a trust against one W. James Smith under a deed conveying land made by one Martha O. Swinton. The testimony had all been taken, and, owing to the resignation of the judge who heard it, had .not been decided. In pursuance of the bill of .revivor the case was brought before Circuit Judge Car

DISSENTING OPINION OP J. ALFRED MAGOON, ESQ.. I am unable to concur in the opinion of the Court. Were I not satisfied that the defendants should prevail in this case a difficulty presents itself which cannot be overcome on this appeal as the case now stands. The original plaintiffs were Mary O. Aldrich, Helen B. King, Harriet N. Brown, Henry S. Swinton, Charles E. S. Swinton, Helen M. Seal

WlULIAMS, PRESIDENT: At the suit of Martba A. Langfitt, a citizen and taxpayer of Doddridge, County, the circuit court of said county prohibited the county court thereof from executing a contract entered into between it and the county court of Tyler, an adjoining county, whereby the former agreed to erect a. concrete bridge, wholly within the territory of Tyler County, and about a quarter of a mile from the dividing line betwe