Cases

[1] ORDER [2] This case came before the court for oral argument November 5, 1997, pursuant to an order that had directed both parties to appear in order to show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing the oral arguments and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the issues raised by this appeal should be decided at this time. [3] The pe

This is a petition for a writ of certiorari brought by Eugene U. Messier and Dennis Brennan, members of the board of canvassers and registration of the city of Central Falls, and Zygmunt J. Czubak, city solicitor of said city, to prevent the respondents, the acting mayor of Central Falls, the board of aldermen and the common council of said city, in joint convention, from considering charges which may result in removing or dismissing the *Page 2

BARRON, Circuit Judge. *631 Andre Walker appeals from the dismissal of the federal petition for writ of habeas corpus that he brings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 15, 2020 Decided November 12, 2021 No. 16-1430 TRUCK TRAILER MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, INC., PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, ET AL., INTERVENORS On Petition for Review of an Actio

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,714-02 In re GARY DAVID GREEN, Relator ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IN CAUSE NO. 13-10-U1040-CAM IN THE 112th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT UPTON COUNTY SCHENCK, P.J., filed a dissenting opinion in which YEARY, J., joined except Part 2.

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRAA. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION On June 9, 2014, I dismissed the patent infringement suit brought by Rates Technology Inc. (“RTI”) against Broadvox Holding Company, LLC and Cypress Communications Operating Company, LLC (collectively “Broadvox”).1 Two weeks later, on June 23, 2014, Broadvox moved, under section 285 o

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

February 16, 2021 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 3 CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT ANGELA BORELLI, ADMINISTRATRIX (ESTATE OF BRANDON GIORDANO) v. ANTHONY RENALDI ET AL.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; RICHARD LEWIS; No. 19-55376 PATRICK LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER D.C. No. WADDELL; CALIFORNIA RIFLE & 3:17-cv-01017- PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a BEN-JLB California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his offic

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; RICHARD LEWIS; No. 19-55376 PATRICK LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER D.C. No. WADDELL; CALIFORNIA RIFLE & 3:17-cv-01017- PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a BEN-JLB California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his offic

536 F.3d 30 (2008) Alexandre ARONOV, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Michael CHERTOFF, et al., Defendants, Appellants. No. 07-1588. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard February 6, 2008. Decided August 1, 2008. *31 Surell Brady, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, U.S.

KEARSE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Carlene J. Perry appeals from so much of a final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont following a combined jury and bench trial before J. Garvan Murtha, Chief Judge, as dismissed her complaint against defendant Ethan Allen, Inc. (“Ethan Allen” or the “company”), alleging sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

275 F.Supp.2d 463 (2003) Percy JEFFREYS, Plaintiff, v. P.O. ROSSI and P.O. Montanez, Defendants. No. 99 Civ.4059 SAS. United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 18, 2003. *464 *465 J. Andrew Kent, Elise S. Zealand, New York City, for Plaintiff. David A. Schwartz, Brett H. Klein,

115 F.3d 143 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1292, 47 Fed. R.Evid. Serv. 188Carlene J. PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.ETHAN ALLEN, INC., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Nos. 912, 913, Dockets 96-7545, 96-7639. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued Feb. 18, 1997.Decided June 2, 1997.

380 A.2d 200 (1977) Richard J. DUFAULT v. MIDLAND-ROSS OF CANADA, LTD. and/or Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. December 7, 1977. *202 McTeague, Higbee & Tierney by Maurice Libner (orally), Patrick N. McTeague, Brunswick, for plaintiff. Richardson, Hildreth, Tyler & Troubh by Robert Hazard (orally

ACCEPTED 01-15-00495-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/1/2015 7:47:30 PM

Pierce, J. Upon the testimony reported by the commissioner and the deposition of Mrs. Snow, after making due allowance for her manifestly somewhat impaired memory, we find and adopt the conclusions of fact found by the trial judge. There is evidence that the testatrix, Mary Dignan, hereafter called the defendant, on April 8, 1874, deposited $200 in the Provident Institution for Savings in Boston in her name a

43 Cal.4th 757 (2008) In re MARRIAGE CASES. [Six consolidated appeals.][1] No. S147999. Supreme Court of California. May 15, 2008. *765 Alliance Defense Fund, Benjamin W. Bull, Glen Lavy, Timothy Donald Chandler, Christopher R. Stovall, Dale Schowengerdt; Advocates for Faith and Freedom, Robert Henry Tyler; Law Offices of Terr

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department