Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-0566 Filed May 1, 2019 MARSHA WHITLOW, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. RON McCONNAHA, JODI McCONNAHA, and TIMOTHY NEWTON, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Muscatine County, Stuart P. Werling, Judge. The plaintiff in a negligence action appeals the denial of

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18–0566 Filed November 8, 2019 MARSHA WHITLOW, Appellant, vs. RON McCONNAHA, JODI McCONNAHA, and TIMOTHY NEWTON, Appellees. ------------------------------ RON McCONNAHA and JODI McCONNAHA, Third-Party Plaintiffs, vs. TIMOTHY NEWTON, Third-Party Defendant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Muscatine Coun

ORDER Sherman and Lisa Imler challenge the denial of their motion to reopen bankruptcy proceedings. The district court upheld the denial. Because the bankruptcy court properly evaluated the factors outlined in Redmond v. Fifth Third Bank, 624 F.Bd 793, 798 (7th Cir.2010), we affirm. The Imlers petitioned for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code in 2002. The next year they were awarded nearly $140,

OPINION Lisa Van Amburg, Judge Randall and Marsha Little appeal the trial court’s judgment quieting, title to a 17-acre parcel of land in favor of Roger and Nancy Nunn Tiemann by adverse possession. We affirm. *807 Background Given

150 B.R. 817 (1993) In re HILLSBOROUGH HOLDINGS CORPORATION, et al., Debtors, HILLSBOROUGH HOLDINGS CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 89-9715-8P1 to 89-9746-8P1, Adv. Nos. 90-0003, 90-0004. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. February 3, 1993. *

166 B.R. 461 (1994) In re HILLSBOROUGH HOLDINGS CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. HILLSBOROUGH HOLDINGS CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 89-9715-8P1 to 89-9746-8P1 and 90-11977-8P1. Adv. Nos. 90-03, 90-04. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. April 18, 1994.

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

JOHN F. STROUD, Jr., Judge, concurring. I concur with the majority in reversing and remanding this case solely because we are bound to follow precedent of the Arkansas Supreme Court. Under our first-degree murder statute, a person commits murder in the first degree if, acting alone or with one or more other persons, he commits or attempts to commit a felony, and in the course of and in the furtherance

147 Cal.App.3d 534 (1983) 195 Cal. Rptr. 252 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent v. CHARLES LEE HAYS, SR., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 15021. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. September 28, 1983. *538 COUNSEL Quin Denvir, State Public Defender, under appointment

Steele Hays, Judge. This is an unemployment insurance claim. The claimant has appealed a determination of the Agency denying benefits to her under the provisions of Section 5(a) of the Arkansas Employment Security Act, which held that she voluntarily quit her last work without good cause connected therewith. The determination of the agency was affirmed by the Appeals Tribunal and by the Board of Review.</

ACCEPTED 12-14-00254-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/9/2015 9:13

765 S.W.2d 823 (1988) TEXAS NATIONAL BANK OF BAYTOWN, Appellant, v. HARRIS COUNTY, et al, Appellees. No. B14-88-00101-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). December 22, 1988. Rehearing Denied February 2, 1989. *824 David W. Showalter, Bellaire, C. Ed Harrell, Edward D. Vickery, Houston, for appella

826 F.Supp.2d 765 (2011) Marsha E. LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. GENESIS HEALTHCARE CORP., Defendant. Civil Action No. 10-2935. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 24, 2011. *767 Andrew S. Abramson, Abramson Employment Law LLC, Blue Bell, PA, for Plaintiff. Michele Halgas Malloy, Corinne Hays, Littler Mendelson

625 S.W.2d 521 (1981) Carlyle SCHOCK, Appellant, v. Dr. James THOMAS, Commissioner, Mental Health Services, Arkansas State Hospital, Appellee. No. 81-92. Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 21, 1981. *522 Central Arkansas Legal Services by Griffin J. Stockley, Jr., and Marsha Yowell, Little Rock, for appellant. Steve Clark

20 Cal.App.4th 1598 (1993) 25 Cal. Rptr.2d 330 HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS' ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Defendant; COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Interveners and Appellants. HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS' ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Defendant; COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Interveners and Appellants. D

*674ROGERS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which POLSTER, D.J., joined. MERRITT, J. (pp. 680-85), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Larry and Marsha Sims appeal a district court order holding that the Sims violated a conservation easement that was part of a real estate purchase agree

346 S.W.3d 343 (2011) Daniel E. BURG and Kris A. Burg, Respondents, v. Marsha C. DAMPIER and Sabrina Graham, Appellants. No. WD 73186. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. July 26, 2011. *346 Thomas M. Schneider, Columbia, MO, for appellants. Garrett S. Taylor, Columbia, MO, for respondents. Before Division

CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge: This court is again presented with issues arising from Daikon Shield litigation in the A.H. Robins bankruptcy case. The appellants, plaintiffs in the Daikon Shield litigation, contest the validity of the new Daikon Shield claimants' committee created by the United States Trustee. Appellants’ objection to the new committee was not timely; however, even if it had been, the district court’s findings on the

950 F.Supp. 649 (1997) Marsha OTTO, F. Naylor Emory, Dennis A. Erb, Robert K. Gilbert, James W. Lossel, Barbara J. McCalley and Wesley S. Semple, Plaintiffs, v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION-NEA, National Education Association, Grove City Area Association and Shaler Area Education Association, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:CV-96-1233. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.