Cases

WESTOVER, District Judge. Plaintiff herein commenced an action against the above named defendants in interpleader, alleging that on or about January 29, 1952 plaintiff issued to Jack A. Burress its policy of insurance No. 32 012 770 in the face amount of $1,000, insuring the life of Jack A. Burress; that said policy of insurance when issued was delivered and designated, and presently designates, as beneficiary “Margaret A. B

148 P.3d 832 (2005) 2005 OK 65 BP AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE AUTO PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Appellee. No. 102,299. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. September 20, 2005. Rehearing Denied and As Corrected October 30, 2006. James C. Lang, G. Steven Stidham, Brian S. Gaskill, Sneed Lang, P.C.

145 F.3d 1224 98 CJ C.A.R. 3809 WEST AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.AV & S, AM & S, LSK, AS & S and Ambassador Pizza, Inc.,Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,andBarry Harper, as conservator for James Harper,Intervenor-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Nos. 96-4094, 96-4096, 96-4097, 96-4138 and 96-4151. Un

King, J. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Steven Kalus (Mr. Kalus) and defendant Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (Merrimack) filed cross motions for summary judgment. Counsel waived their right to a hearing on the motions and submitted the case on the briefs and supporting documents. The undisputed facts as taken from the summary judgment record are as follows. Plaintiffs wife, Kelly Kalus (Mr

Benjamin, Justice: This Court is presented with the following two certified questions from the United States District Court for the Northern Distinct of West Virginia: 1. Applying West Virginia public policy and rules of contract construction, do the unambiguous exclusions in American National’s policy for bodily injury or property damage “which i

EBEL, Circuit Judge. 'West American Insurance Company appeals the district court’s declaratory judgment that it had a duty to defend its insureds ■under an insurance contract. The insureds cross-appeal the district court’s denial of a motion for attorney fees incurred by the insureds in litigating the declaratory judgment action. We affirm. BACKGROUND <

* Review granted October 3, 1991. Opinion ordered published July 9, 1992. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1199 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

912 P.2d 861 (1996) MAX TRUE PLASTERING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. BOB H. JOHNSON AGENCY and Jeff R. Johnson, Third Party Defendants. No. 85860. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 27, 1996. As Corrected March 5 and 8, 1996. Joseph R. Farris, Jerry Reed, Judy R. Nat