Cases

528 U.S. 562 (2000) VILLAGE OF WILLOWBROOK et al. v. OLECH No. 98-1288. United States Supreme Court. Argued January 10, 2000. Decided February 23, 2000. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT James L. DeAno argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners. *563

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 14-1435 ___________________________ Mark Robbins; Gail Robbins; I-44 Truck Center and Wrecker Service, LLC; I-44 Wrecker Service, LLC lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Randy

352 F.Supp.2d 285 (2005) Lindell HARVEY, Plaintiff, v. Kathy MARK and City of Hartford, Hartford Public Schools, Defendants. No. 3:02CV1086(DJS). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. January 20, 2005. *286 Francis A. Miniter, Miniter & Associates, Hartford, CT, for Plaintiff. Joseph W. McQuade, Kainen, Escaler

BAUER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellants, D.S. and her parents, Debbie Lynn Stahl and George M. Stahl, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant-appellees, East Porter County School Corporation and Morgan Township Middle/High School (collectively “East Porter”), and Porter Township School Corporation and Boone Grove Middle School (collectively “PTSC”), alleging vari

FLAUM, Chief Judge. Mark Bell owns a vacation home on the shoreline of Lake Michigan’s Green Bay in Door County, Wisconsin. In 1993, Bell obtained a permit from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (“DNR”) in order to construct a private pier into the bay. In 1998, Bell decided to expand his pier. He therefore attempted to obtain a permit from the DNR so he could build a 60-foot extension onto his existing pier, a rub

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE A pipeline operator challenges a local ordinance prohibiting loading crude oil onto tankers and new structures for that purpose on the grounds that it is preempted under numerous federal and state laws, that it violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, that it violates the business's civil rights, its due process rights, its right to avoid improper delegation,

MARK W. BENNETT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...1079 II. LEGAL ANALYSIS ...1080 A. Procedural Default ...1080 B. The Eighth Amendment Claim ...1081 C. The Equal Protection/Selective Pros

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-3829 MARK BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TERE DUPERRAULT, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. No

B. FAS's Knowledge of and Response to Rented Trade Flow Transactions FAS discovered the widespread use of rented trade flows under the program early on. Cargill Incorporated, a program participant, disclosed the structure and use of rented trade flows to FAS as early as 2002, and FAS neither objected nor gave any indication that rented trade flows were not allowed. Id. ¶ 25. Thereafter, FAS vetted and approved thou

POSNER, Chief Judge. Eyrie Stuart Hilton, IV sued the Village of Wheeling (a Chicago suburb) and members of its police force (plus two social workers employed by the Village) for in-junctive relief and damages, alleging violations of his constitutional rights to petition the government for redress of grievances and to enjoy the equal protection of the laws. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERKINS COIE LLP, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-716 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION

#29610-a-MES 2022 S.D. 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OF GARRY EHLEBRACHT, STEVEN GREBER, MARY GREBER, RICHARD RALL, AMY RALL, AND LARETTA KRANZ, Appellants, v. CROWNED RIDGE WIND II, LLC, and SOUTH DAKOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION,

SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge. Reddick Borkins. Ill challenges the dismissal of his Bivens1 complaint alleging constitutional violations by officials of several government agencies. The gravamen of the complaint is that the defendants unconstitutionally interfered with his claim for workers’ compensation benefits under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 8101-93 (“FECA”). We have

(2008) Terry S. BYNUM, Individually, and on Behalf of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Benjamin G. Bynum, Jr., Deceased, and the Estate of Benjamin G. Bynum, Jr., Deceased, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MAGEE, Mississippi, Simpson County, Mississippi, Lane Steel, Bobby J. Williams, and John Does I-X, Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:06cv639 TSL-JCS. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Div

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Joseph Torro v. Case No. 18-cv-213-AJ Opinion No. 2019 DNH 052 Mark Goldberg, Marilyn Gordon, and the Town of Bradford O R D E R Joseph Torro brought suit alleging federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law claims against Mark Goldberg, Marilyn Gordon, and the Town of Br

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) XP VEHICLES, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-cv-0037 (KBJ) ) DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, et al., )

ACCEPTED 15-24-00095-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/3/2025 3:39 PM No. 15-24-00095-CV CHRISTOPHER A. P

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM E. SMITH, District Judge. “A breeze ruffled the neat hedges of Privet Drive, which lay silent and tidy under the inky sky, the very last place you would expect astonishing things to happen.” J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone 17 (Scholastic Press 1997). And yet, according to Plaintiffs Jeffrey and Linda Wyrostek (“Plaintiffs” or “Wyrosteks”), ast

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. This case raises the question: what could be worse than having most of your home burn down in a fire? The answer, of course, is having the rest of it burn down a couple of days later in a second fire. What would make the situation dramatically worse, however, is if the fire department determined that the second fire was intentionally set (possibly by you)

796 F.Supp.2d 503 (2011) Rajat K. GUPTA, Plaintiff, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Defendant. No. 11 Civ. 1900(JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 11, 2011. *506 Alan Roy Friedman, David Stanley Frankel, Gary P. Naftalis, Michael Stewart Oberman, Michael J. Sternhell, Robin Marie Wilcox, Kramer Levin N