Cases

This is an action brought by plaintiff (respondent) against defendant (appellant) to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while he was employed as a switchman in defendant's Topeka, Kansas, yards, and caused by the negligence of defendant. The amended petition upon which the cause was tried alleged that at the time in question plaintiff and defendant were engaged in either intrastate or interstate transportation, but as to which of said alternatives was

221 F.3d 100 (2nd Cir. 2000) FRANCIS S., Petitioner-Appellant,v.JAMES C. STONE, Commissioner, New York Office of Mental Health; RENATE WACK, Director, Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center, Respondents-Appellees.ROBERT M. MORGENTHAU, District Attorney of New York County, Intervenor-Respondent-Appellee. Docket No. 97-2423August Term 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSSECOND CIRCUIT</

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal challenges the constitutionality of a state court order recommitting a defendant for mental health treatment nine years after he entered a plea of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect. It also requires consideration of the new standard applicable to a federal court’s exercise of habeas corpus jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) (1994 & Supp. IV 1998), as recentl

During the period involved in this action appellees were engaged in the plumbing business, and in their activities in said business, according to the allegations of the declaration, appellees "supplied materials and labor, and installed said plumbing and said heating plants, and supplied the instrumentalities for doing said work, and the gross income received therefrom was based on a fixed, lump sum price, for said material, labor and workmanship, and no part of said gross income was derived

Filed 8/24/20 See Concurring and Dissenting Opinion CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION ∗ IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, E069462 Plaintiff, Cross-defendant, and (Super.Ct.No. RIC1412266) Appellant,

385 F.2d 581 128 U.S.App.D.C. 59 BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, Switchmen's Union of NorthAmerica, et al., Appellants,v.The AKRON & BARBERTON BELT RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Appellees.ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS AND BRAKEMEN, Appellant,v.The AKRON & BARBERTON BELT RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Appellees.The AKRON & BARBERTON BELT RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Appellants,v.BROTHERHO

Filed 9/16/20 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, E069462 Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and (Super.Ct.No. RIC1412266) Appellant,

62 Ill. App.3d 653 (1978) 378 N.E.2d 1232 KANDYTHE J. LIEPELT, Adm'r of the Estate of Delroy Liepelt, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 77-677. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division). Opinion filed July 5, 1978. *654

335 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2004) State of NEW MEXICO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV 99-1118 BSJ/KBM, CIV 99-1254 BSJ/ACT (Consolidated). United States District Court, D. New Mexico. April 6, 2004. *1186 *1187 *1188 <

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries brought by Frank J. Jandera, defendant in error, plaintiff below, on November 11, 1905, against the Atchison, Topeka *Page 107 Santa Fe Railway Company, plaintiff in error, defendant below, in the district court of Noble county. The petition substantially states that defendant owns and operates a line of railway through the city of Perry in this state, with its main track, side tracks, and station

Mr. Justice Brandeis, dissenting. The main question for consideration is that of statutory construction. By- Transportation Act, 1920, February 28, 1920, c. 91, § 15a, 41 Stat. 456, 488, Congress delegated to the Interstate Commerce Commission the duty to establish and maintain rates which will yield “ a fair return upon the aggregate value of the railway property” of the United States. By paragraph 4 thereof, it

149 Cal.App.3d 862 (1983) 197 Cal. Rptr. 179 TERRIE R. NELSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. 50900. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four. December 14, 1983. *864 COUNSEL Anthony J. Klein, John C. Hall, Di Giorgio, Davis

CONTENTS Page Headnote . 499 Opinion (Introduction) . 505 General Findings of Fact . 506 I. Issue (i): Rapid Amortization of Freight Cars Findings of Fact Opinion . 1Í5 ^ H H CO LO lO lO II. Issues (hh) and (9): Recovery Upon Merger of Previously Deducted Amounts . 548 Findings of Fact . 549 Opinion . 557 Is

GOODE, J. This plaintiff, a resident of San Francisco, California, purchased in that city from the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company, on September 10, 1904, a railroad ticket good for passage from there to St. Louis, Missouri, and return, over said railroad company’s line between San Francisco and Kansas City, and over the Chicago & Alton railroad between Kansas City and St. Louis. He testified there was no att

Reed, J., delivered the opinion of the court. • Appellee brought this action originally before a justice of the peace, claiming the sum of §186.40 balance due for stone alleged to have been delivered to appellant. An appeal was taken to the county court, case tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment for §171.81. •. It appears that one J. H. Naughton had a contract for. bridge

Reed, J., delivered the opinion of the court. • Appellee brought this action originally before a justice of the peace, claiming the sum of §186.40 balance due for stone alleged to have been delivered to appellant. An appeal was taken to the county court, case tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment for §171.81. •. It appears that one J. H. Naughton had a contract for. bridge

128 F.Supp. 475 (1953) MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. The NORTHERN PACIFIC TERMINAL COMPANY OF OREGON, Great Northern Railway Company, Spokane, Portland and Seattle Railway Co., Northern Pacific Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Company, Railway Express Agency, Incorporated, F. D. Hartwick, doing business as Nehalem Valley Motor Freight, Gustave Robertson, doing business as Robertson Freight

Mr. Justice Magruder delivered the opinion of the court: It is conceded by both parties, that the only controversy in this case is as to the existence of an alleged public highway, referred to in the pleadings, across the property of the appellants herein. Lot 5, belonging to the appellants, runs east and west, is four chaius wide,

Mr. Justice Carter delivered the opinion of the court: This was a proceeding before the Industrial Board of Illinois under the Workmen’s Compensation act to recover for the injuries causing the death of Jens Christensen, received on the' night of December 19, 1914, while in the employ of plaintiff in error. The committee of arbitration, after hearing the evidence, made

HALLER, J. This matter arises from Whitney Engler's use of a medical device, the Polar Care 500, that was manufactured by Breg, Inc. (Breg) and prescribed by David Chao, a medical doctor. Engler suffered injuries as a result of her use of the Polar Care 500, and she brought various tort claims against Chao, his medical group Oasis MSO, Inc. (Oasis), and Breg, among others. At trial, the jury considered Engler's cl