Cases

Opinion issued August 29, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00604-CV ——————————— J. MARK MILLER TRUST, Appellant V. KARLA MILLER,

NO. 12-16-00296-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS RAHEEM MARK MILLER, § APPEAL FROM THE 392ND APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE §

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 02, 2014 Session MARK MILLER v. ANNIE MILLER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 09D2178 Phillip R. Robinson, Judge No. M2014-00281-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 7, 2015 Plaintiff/Appellee Mark Andrew Miller (“Father”) filed a petition for conte

FILED STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA July 19, 2021 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA MARK A. MILLER, Claimant Below, Petitioner vs.) No. 20-0298 (BOR Appeal No. 2054720) (Claim No. 2018014662) WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, Employer Below, Respondent MEMORANDUM DECISION Petitioner Mark A. Miller, by Counsel Robert L. Stultz, appeals the decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review (“Board of Review”). West Virg

05/29/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 28, 2018 Session JENNIFER LEE MILLER v. DAVID MARK MILLER, II Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 29478 Joseph Woodruff, Chancellor No. M2017-01867-COA-R3-CV This ap

302 Ga. 872 FINAL COPY S18Y0264. IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER MARK MILLER. PER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition of Christopher Mark Miller (State Bar No. 506428) for voluntary surrender of license, pursuant to Bar Rule 4-227 (b). On November 7, 2016, this Court accepted a petition for voluntary discipline filed by Miller, who has been a member of the Bar since 1990, in which petition he proposed that he be suspended pending the resolut

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 10a0312p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - MARK MILLER; COALITION OPPOSED TO -

Order filed February 11, 2020 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-20-00003-CV ____________ NEWS NOW BAYTOWN, Appellant V. CITY OF BAYTOWN, MARK MILLER-PIO, NATASHA BARRETT, Appellees On Appeal from County

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 31, 2020. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00003-CV NEWS NOW BAYTOWN, Appellant V. CITY OF BAYTOWN, MARK MILLER-PIO, AND NATASHA BARRETT, Appellees On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texa

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-00-00548-CR Ronald Mark Miller, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Crone, Judge. Case Summary Mark H. Miller, II (“Father”), appeals the decree dissolving his marriage to Leigh Anne Miller (“Mother”). He contends that the trial court clearly erred in finding that he is voluntarily underemployed, given that his decision to enroll as a part-time college student and forgo full-time employment was made with Mother’s agreement

141 F.3d 252 Mark MILLER, Mark Miller for Congress Committee, OonaMiller, and Peter R. Swendseid, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.LORAIN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and Bob Taft, OhioSecretary of State, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-4267. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Dec. 3, 1997.Decided April 2, 1998.

PER CURIAM: *697Denied. Applicant shows no lower court error. Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244

PER CURIAM: *697Denied. Applicant shows no lower court error. Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244

FILED SEPTEMBER 1, 2020 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHING

Per curiam. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition of Christopher Mark Miller (State Bar No. 506428) for voluntary surrender of license, pursuant to Bar Rule 4-227 (b). On November 7, 2016, this Court accepted a petition for voluntary discipline filed by Miller, who has been a member of the Bar since 1990, in which petition he proposed that he be suspended pending the resolution of multiple felony charg

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. James, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 10-F-6011; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 16-KH-23 | denied.

Per curiam. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition of Christopher Mark Miller (State Bar No. 506428) for the voluntary suspension of his license to practice law pending the resolution of multiple felony charges that he is currently facing in the Superior Court of Pickens County. The State Bar recommends acceptance of the petition and notes that Miller is currently ineligible to practice law as a result of

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1032 CAF 13-00616 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF MARK B. MILLER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHIVON PEDERSON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. --------------------------------------- IN THE MATTER OF MARK B. MILLER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, AND SUSAN MILLER, PETITIONER,