Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mark Johnson v. Comenity Bank”
Emily Schweitzer v. Comenity Bankpublic domain
JORDAN, Circuit Judge: In law, as in life, consent need not be an all-or-nothing proposition. Having already concluded that the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq., allows for the oral revocation of consent, see Osorio v. State Farm Bank, F.S.B., 746 F.3d 1242, 1255 (11th Cir. 2014), we now hold that the Act permits a consumer to part
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2020-Ohio-4178.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 18CA011329 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE MARLON JOHNS
State v. Shine-Johnsonpublic domain
SADLER, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Joseph T. Shine-Johnson, appeals a decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas convicting him of murder and tampering with evidence. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY {¶ 2} On September 18, 2015, a Franklin County Grand Jury indicted appellan
Suluki v. Credit One Bank, NApublic domain
23-721-cv Suluki v. Credit One Bank, NA UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2023 (Argued: June 26, 2024 Decided: May 28, 2025) Docket No. 23-721-cv KHALILAH SULUKI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Wood v. Credit One Bankpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION M. Hannah Lauck, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff David W. Wood’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (ECF No.- 55), Defendant Credit One Bank’s (“Credit One”) Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 67), and Wood’s Motion to Exclude Testimony and Opinions of James Lynn (the “Motion to Exclude”), (E
Kelen v. World Financial Network National Bankpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER VERNON S. BRODERICK, District Judge: Before the Court is the unopposed Joint Motion of Plaintiffs Esther Kelen, Elizabeth Taub, and Yocheved Milo to Consolidate Cases and for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. (12-CV-5024, Doc. 37; 12-CV-9113, Doe. 30; and 12-CV-9418, Doe. 25.) Plaintiffs seek an order (1) consolidating the eases captioned above, (2) certify
Zean v. Comcast Broadband Sec., LLCpublic domain
ANALYSIS The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. , requires the enforcement of written agreements to arbitrate disputes and reflects a "liberal federal policy favoring arbitration agreements," Moses H. Cone Mem'l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp. ,
DeSuze v. Ammonpublic domain
20-1141 DeSuze et al. v. Ammon et al. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2020 No. 20-1141 MARY DESUZE, LOUIS GRANT, PETRA MONTGOMERY, CARLOTA BROWN, LEONARD ANDRE, RENEE AVENT, ARLENE HIPP, DEBORAH PRIESTER, ANGELA JONES, ELVIA SCHARSCHMIDT, PAMELA LOCKLEY, for themselves and other
State v. Markspublic domain
[Cite as State v. Marks, 2024-Ohio-4863.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT VAN WERT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 15-23-11 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. CRAIG MARKS, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF OHIO, C
State v. Breffordpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Brefford, 2025-Ohio-4436.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 23AP-644 (C.P.C. No. 23CR-2226) v. :
Danger v. Nextep Funding, LLCpublic domain
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Nextep Funding, LLC ("Nextep") [Doc. No. 46] and Monterey Financial Services, *801LLC ("Monterey") [Doc. Nos. 22 & 39]. For the reasons stated below, Defendants' motions are denied. I.
Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. Wheelerpublic domain
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, Senior United States District Judge The Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (the "NRDC") brings claims under the Administrative Procedure Act (the "APA") to challenge the issuance of a directive by the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA"), which purportedly purges the EPA's advisory committees of scientists from academic and non-profit backgrounds in favor of those from ind
State v. Bakerpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Baker, 2012-Ohio-1833.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97139 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
State v. Angelpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Angel, 2021-Ohio-4322.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 19AP-771 (C.P.C. No. 17CR-4241) v. : (
Gambles v. Sterling Infosystems, Inc.public domain
OPINION & ORDER Paul A. Engelmayer, United States District Judge Plaintiff Ralph Gambles brings this putative class action under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, '15 U.S.C. § 1681 éí seq. (“FCRA”). He claims that- defendant Ster-. ling Infosystems, Inc.. (“Sterling”) violated his privacy rights under FCRA when, for use by a prospective employer to whom Gambles had applied for a job as a mortgag
Culwick v. Woodpublic domain
ERIC N. VITALIANO, United States District Judge Plaintiff Vivienne Culwick, as administratrix of the estate of Steven Eliot Wood *335(the "Estate"), commenced this action on October 13, 2015. ( Compl., ECF No. 1 ). After twice amending it, the complaint presents claims for breach of contract, conversion, unjust enrichment, and declaratory judgm
State v. Lancasterpublic domain
DONOVAN, J. *955 {¶ 1} This matter is before the Court on the December 6, 2016 Notice of Appeal of Michael D. Lancaster. Lancaster ("Appellant") appeals from his November 14, 2016 judgment entry of conviction, following a jury trial, on one count of rape, in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b
State v. Hatfieldpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Hatfield, 2022-Ohio-148.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 28990 : v.
Gustav Buchholz v. Meyer Njus Tanick, PApublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0002p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT GUSTAV BUCHHOLZ, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │
State v. Dorseypublic domain
[Cite as State v. Dorsey, 2015-Ohio-4659.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. John W. Wise, J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon