Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0245p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURTNEY CATES; BRIAN STOVER; JASON MILLER, on ┐ behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, │ Plaintiffs-Appellants,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-2749 JASON L. WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

USCA11 Case: 19-14969 Document: 113-1 Date Filed: 01/05/2024 Page: 1 of 56 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-14969 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00692-CR Mark A. SALAZAR, Appellant v. The T

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 16‐1635 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. JASON PERRY, Defendant‐Appellant. ________________

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00285-CR Jason Clay DOTSON, Appellant v. The The STATE of

NOTICE 2024 IL App (5th) 230274 Decision filed 03/20/24. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0274 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for IN THE Rehearing or the disposition of the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ RON & MARK

BRADFORD, Judge, dissenting. • Because I believe that the improper communication between the bailiff and the jury foreperson did not amount to fundamental error, I respectfully dissent. In addition, because I believe that Sowers cannot challenge the allegedly inconsistent verdicts on appeal and also that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the jury’s determination that Sowers was guilty but mentally ill of C

NAJAM, Judge. Statement of the Case [1] John Barker and Specialty Limos, LLC (collectively, “Barker”) appeal the *369 trial court’s entry of summary judgment for Jason Price. Barker raises a single issue for our review, which we restate as whether the trial court erred when

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT WETHERBEE’S MOTION TO AMEND WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Wetherbee’s Motion to Join Additional Parties and Amend Pleadings by Filing of His First Counterclaims of Prima Facie.Tort, Conspiracy,. Civil RICO, and Conspiracy under Civil RICO [Doc. 181] (“Motion to Amend”), filed on Oct

RUSSELL, District Judge. Plaintiff Robert Miller (“Miller”) appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Jason Cate, Nicole Reid, Michael Jones, and Monica Tedford (“officers”) on his claims of assault and battery and the officers’ use of excessive force. Plaintiffs suit arises from events surrounding his arrest in Flint, Michigan for interfering with the police during the lawful e

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 04-1324 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JASON BEST, a/k/a JBOO, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S JOINT MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO COUNT TWO AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS FOR ENDEAVORING TO USE AND ENDEAVORING TO DISCLOSE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon a Joint Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings as to Count Two Against

OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. Plaintiffs are hourly employees at defendant Kraft Foods Global, Inc.’s meat processing plant in Madison, Wisconsin. Before they clock in for work, plaintiffs are required to put on several items of safety and sanitation equipment and then walk to their work stations where the time clock is located. The process is repeated in reverse after plaintiffs clock

OPINION Holly Kirby, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Jeffrey S. Bivins, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark, Sharon G. Lee, and Roger A. Page, JJ., joined. We granted this appeal to address whether our holding in W

342 F.Supp.2d 746 (2004) BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE AMERICAS HOLDING, INC., Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff No. 3:02-0994. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. August 23, 2004. George H. Cate, III, Neal & Harwell, Nashville, TN, Mark P. Rotatori, James Daly, Chicago,

405 F.Supp.2d 1254 (2005) Susan Grace SCHNEIDER, Richard Harry Schneider, and, Robert Andries Schneider, As Trustees of the Revocable Trust of Janet S. Schneider dated October 26, 1987, as amended, Plaintiffs, and Susan Grace Schneider Richard Harry Schneider, and Robert Andries Schneider, in their capacities as Beneficiaries of the Revocable Trust of Janet S. Schneider dated October 26, 1987, as amended. Additional Plaintiffs, v. Henry H. CA

483 F.Supp.2d 766 (2007) TEMPUR-PEDIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff v. WASTE TO CHARITY, INC.; Broco Supply, Inc.; Jack Fitzgerald; Eric Volovic; Howard Hirsch; Thomas Scarello; Nelson Silva; Close Out Surplus and Savings, Inc.; and Ernest Peia, Defendants. Civil No. 07-2015. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division. March 28, 2007.

824 F.Supp.2d 856 (2012) WISCONSIN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION COUNCIL; Wisconsin Council of County and Municipal Employees, AFSCME, District Council 40, AFL-CIO; Wisconsin State Employees Union, AFSCME, District Council 24, AFL-CIO; AFT-Wisconsin, AFL-CIO; AFSCME, District Council 48, AFL-CIO; Seiu Healthcare Wisconsin, CTW, CLC; and Wisconsin State AFL-CIO, Plaintiffs, v. Scott WALKER, Governor, State of Wisconsin; Michael Huebsch, Secretary, Departm