Cases

This cause is before the court on appeal from a judgment of the Wood County Court of Common Pleas. On February 18, 1988, plaintiff-appellee, Raymond B. Fogg, filed a complaint on two cognovit notes signed by defendant-appellant Charles E. Friesner. The complaint alleged that both notes were due and that appellant had refused to pay them. Judgment was entered in favor of appellee on February 23, 1988. The award was for the aggregate sum of $74,940.49 with interest at the rate of

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, 4060 Sullivant Ltd., Douglas K. Abel ("Abel"), and Charles A. Koenig ("Koenig") (collectively "appellants"), appeal from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Heartland Bank ("appellee"). For the following reasons, we affirm. {¶ 2} Appellee initiated this action with a complaint filed on February 6, 2008, seeking to enforce the cognovit provisions of three note

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, James M. Ryan ("appellant"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas on a cognovit note in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Sky Bank ("appellee"), and against appellant and his co-defendant Michael Colley ("Colley").1 {¶ 2} Appellee initiated this action with a complaint filed on August 1

[Cite as KeyBank Natl. Assn. v. Midtown Inspirion, L.L.C., 2025-Ohio-1737.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 114393 v.

OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant William T. Webb appeals from the February 17, 2006, Judgment Entry of the Knox County Court of Common Pleas denying his Motion to Vacate a Judgment and for Sanctions, or in the Alternative Motion to Stay Collection of Judgment and from the February 17, 2006, Order of the Knox County Court of Common Pleas denying his Motion to Consolidat

STEPHENS, Judge. I. Procedural History and Factual Background A. Cognovit Note Defendant Bruce Tallmadge, dba Tallmadge Holding Co., LLC., executed a demand cognovit promissory note (“Note”) dated 25 March 2004 to Plaintiff Michael J. Gardner which, reproduced here,2 reads as follows: DEMAND COGNOVIT PROMISSORY NOTE

Filed 9/16/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2020 ND 201 Kari Cathryn O’Keeffe, Plaintiff, Appellee, and Cross-Appellant v. Timothy Michael O’Keeffe, Defendant, Appellant, and Cross-Appel

165 Ariz. 543 (1990) 799 P.2d 884 STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Reginald LOERA, Appellee. No. 1 CA-CR 89-407. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A. August 14, 1990. Reconsideration Denied September 24, 1990. *544 William J. Eckstrom, Jr., Mohave County Atty. by Craig R.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER SEYBERT, District Judge: Pending before the Court are the following: (1) Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson’s Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) that the motion for partial default judgment filed by Plaintiffs Johannes Baumgartner Wirtschafts-Und Vermógensberatung GmbH (“JBWV”) and Holger' Knut Theiler (“Theiler,” and together with JBWV, “Plaintiffs”) on their cl

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 849 Defendants, Kenneth Corrado and Northpoint Homes, Inc., appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their motion to vacate the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Medina Supply Company, Inc. Plaintiff obtained judgment on a cognovit note signed by defendants. Defendants moved to vacate this judgment be

OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Thomas and Jacqueline Ullmo brought suit in state court against Gilmour Academy, alleging breach of contract, fraud, and a violation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1491. They based their claims upon Gilmour’s alleged failure to provide their son, Jason, with an education designe

753 F.Supp.2d 816 (2009) Toby BEVILL, Plaintiff, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., Defendant. No. 4:08-cv-00287-JEG. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. December 30, 2009. *818 Scott M. Brennan, Davis Brown Koehn Shors & Roberts P.C., Des Moines, IA, Charles C. DeWitt, Jr., Littler Mendelson PLC, Detroit, MI,

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Sarah Phillips-Foster brought this declaratory judgment action against UNUM Life Insurance Company of America which had insured her deceased husband, Mark Foster. UNUM declined to pay her the policy proceeds because of a contractual suicide exclusion and because of her suspected involvement in Foster’s death. She sued the company and other beneficiaries, a

348 So.2d 1196 (1977) NEIDA's BOUTIQUE, INC., Appellants, v. GABOR AND COMPANY et al., Appellees. No. 76-1405. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 19, 1977. Rehearing Denied August 31, 1977. *1197 Taylor, Brion, Buker & Greene and Arnaldo Velez, Miami, for appellants. West, Friesn

302 F.3d 785 Sarah L. PHILLIPS-FOSTER, Plaintiff/Appellant,v.UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant/Appellee,Nancy Ruhland, as parent and natural guardian of Ian G. Foster and Craig A. Foster, minor children; Jeramy T. Foster; Angela Sue Whitwam; Victoria Poshard; Diane Della Busta, as guardian ad-litem for Zoe Elizabeth Phillips, a minor child, Defendants. No. 01-3570. No.

35 N.J. Super. 575 (1955) 114 A.2d 577 MARY SIMMONS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARNETT SIMMONS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued May 31, 1955. Decided June 2, 1955. *576 Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD. Mr. Robert S. Hartgrove argued the c

*577The opinion of the court was delivered by Goldmann, S. J. A. D. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Chancery Division dismissing with prejudice her action for separate maintenance because the proofs failed to establish that she ever entered into a ceremonial marriage with defendant, but rather showed she had previously contracted such a marriage

Bradbury, J. The plaintiff in error filed in the court of common pleas, a petition in the following words and figures: Court of common pleas, Hocking county-, Ohio. The Gambia Iron Company, plaintiff v. Robert W. Keynes, I. N. Collins, L. A. Culver, S. H. Bright, B. R. Higgins, D. M. Motherwell and M. D. Moore, defendants. Petition. Civil action

Spear, C. J. The question argued by counsel for plaintiff in error, as arising upon the record, is, whether or not, in an action commenced prior to the beginning of the term, upon a claim for money, a judgment announced though not placed upon the journal during the term but entered nunc pro tuno after the term, creates a lien upon, the real estate of the judgment debtor, as against a bona fide purchaser who buy

Hooker, J. The relator filed his petition in the Antrim county circuit court, praying a mandamus to compel the treasurer of that county to accept and file his bond as liquor dealer, and, the writ being denied, he has brought the proceeding to this Court by certiorari. The petition for certiorari does not contain the allegations of error usual in such cases, and we find a voluminous record, raising numbe