Cases

428 S.E.2d 238 (1993) 109 N.C. App. 506 Gerard M. GUYTHER and Roxy M. Guyther v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 9227SC168. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 6, 1993. *239 Alala Mullen Holland & Cooper, P.A. by H. Randolph Sumner and Raboteau T. Wilder, Jr., Gastonia, for plaintif

Macumber v South New Berlin Lib. (2020 NY Slip Op 05113) Macumber v South New Berlin Lib. 2020 NY Slip Op 05113 Decided on September 24, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reportin

Dorsey, C. J.. delivered the opinion of this court. The plaintiff below, in his declaration, sought to recover of the defendant, on the usual counts of general indebitatus assumpsit, money lent and advanced, and money had and received. The defendant pleaded non assumpsit, and filed two accounts in bar against the plaintiff: the one charging him with $300, due to him from the plaintiff, for t

The following facts appear from the pleadings: Kinchen Taylor, the elder, made his will 6 November, 1836, and therein devised and bequeathed as follows: "It is my will that my negroes and stock shall be kept on the plantation whereon I live, until my son Kinchen attain the age of 21 years. "I give to my two daughters, Harriet Jane Taylor and Charity D. Taylor, my piney woods tract of land, containing 776 acres. "I give to my son Joshua, $1000, to be raised from the

481 S.E.2d 349 (1997) Michael G. MARKHAM and Terry Markham Gibson, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, v. K. J. SMITH BUILDERS & REALTY, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. No. COA96-436. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 4, 1997. *351 Richard M. Warren and

304 F.Supp.2d 758 (2004) JOHN S. CLARK COMPANY, INC. Plaintiff, v. UNITED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.; and the Travelers Indemnity Company, Defendants. No. 1:02CV00576. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. January 5, 2004. *759 *760 Steven Douglas

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K- BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiffs Paul and Annette Fabozzi commenced the above-captioned action against defendant Lexington Insurance Company (“Defendant”), John Does 1-10 and ABC Corps. 1-10,1 on October 29, 2004, alleging that Defendant breached the terms of a homeowner’s insurance policy covering the Fabozzi home in Staten Island

HORTON, Judge. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in the admission of hearsay evidence by (I) allowing a medical expert to testify about the findings and opinions of a non-testifying medical expert; (II) allowing plaintiff to testify to what she was told by her non-testifying physician; (III) allowing the admission of certain medical bills and records; and (IV) denying his motion for a new trial.

441 S.E.2d 172 (1994) 114 N.C. App. 52 Homer BUFFALOE v. Patricia HART and Lowell Thomas Hart. No. 939SC430. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 15, 1994. Davis, Sturges & Tomlinson by Charles M. Davis, Louisburg, for plaintiff-appellee. *173 Norman & Gardner by Larry E. Norman, Louisb

254 Md. 377 (1969) 254 A.2d 696 BROWN, ET AL. v. BOWLES [No. 294, September Term, 1968.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided June 30, 1969. The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, McWILLIAMS, FINAN and SINGLEY, JJ. David M. Williams, with whom was Walter B. Dorsey on the brief, for appellants.

227 Md. 318 (1962) 176 A.2d 867 STATE, USE OF MIEDZINSKI v. GRAY [No. 113, September Term, 1961.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided January 11, 1962. *320 The cause was argued before HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY, MARBURY and SYBERT, JJ. Oliver R. Guyther, with whom was Charles A. Norris</

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________ ) SONYA PETTAWAY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 07-1721 (RBW) )

699 F.Supp.2d 185 (2010) Sonya PETTAWAY, Plaintiff, v. TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1721 (RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 30, 2010. *187 Denise Marie Clark, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Elisabeth Moriarty-Ambrozaitis, Karla

12 Md. App. 69 (1971) 277 A.2d 449 STATE OF MARYLAND v. JOSEPH CHESTER SWALES AND ELIZABETH REGINA SWALES. STATE OF MARYLAND v. EDWARD LINCOLN WELCH AND BERTIE BOWMAN. Nos. 516, 517, September Term, 1970. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided May 24, 1971. The causes were argued before MURPHY, C.J., and MOYLAN and POWERS, JJ.<

Collins, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an appeal from a judgment in the amount of $7,797.12 rendered against the appellant, Philip E. Gray, Incorporated, and in favor of the appellee, Margaret W. Gray. The suit was in assumpsit for services rendered by the appellee, plaintiff, to the appellant, defendant, in that amount. The case comes to this Court on the denial of the a

52 F.Supp.2d 569 (1999) WM. C. VICK CONSTRUCTION CO., Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Great American Insurance Co., Defendants. No. 5:97-CV-692-BR(1). United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. March 24, 1999. *570 *571 Daniel

62 S.E.2d 713 (1950) 233 N.C. 1 CARTER et al. v. KEMPTON et al. No. 531. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 13, 1950. *716 Garland & Garland, Gastonia, and Frank H. Kennedy, Charlotte, for plaintiff appellees. Tillett, Campbell, Craighill & Rendleman, Charlotte, for appellee Madge Car

The plaintiffs brought suit to compel the defendants to carry out their contract for the purchase of the lands described in the complaint. The case was heard by Sink, J., upon agreed facts, of which the following are pertinent to the opinion and decision of the Court: C. C. Coddington, Sr., died on 2 December, 1928, seized and possessed of a fee simple title described in the contract of purchase and sale *Page 716 between the parties. He lef

Eccleston, J., delivered the opinion of this court. This is an action of replevin, brought on the 24th of February 1857, by the appellee against the appellants, for two negro girls, Betty and Nelly. The defendants pleaded non cepit, property in themselves, property in a stranger, and limitations. The cause was tried upon issues joined on those pleas. The facts, in regard to which the