Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mark Falk”
Owen v. Falkpublic domain
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act *1079article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Edlitz, J.), dated September 21, 2009, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Fur-man, S.M) dated February 20, 2009, which, after a hearing, granted his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation only to t
Falk v. Owenpublic domain
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Edlitz, J.), entered August 24, 2004, as, in effect, confirmed an order of the same court (Furman, S.M.), entered July 27, 2004, which, after a hearing, found that he willfully failed to obey an order of support of the same court (Furman, S.M.), entered February 13, 2004, and t
Sanofi-Aventis v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC.public domain
598 F.Supp.2d 632 (2009) SANOFI-AVENTIS, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Plaintiff, v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1605 (WJM). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. February 20, 2009. *633 William J. O'Shaughnessy, Jonathan M.H. Short, Nicole A. Corona, McCarter & English, LLP, Newark, NJ,
Falk v. Falkpublic domain
MeCORD, Judge. Appellant husband appeals that portion of the final judgment of dissolution of the parties’ marriage that awards custody of the parties’ young daughter to appellee wife. We affirm. In his final judgment, the trial judge elaborated on the many factors that influenced his decision. The final judgment and the record in this case show that, although both appellant and appellee have a good re
In Re the Extradition of Bolanospublic domain
594 F.Supp.2d 515 (2009) In the Matter of the EXTRADITION OF Magdalena Pacheco BOLANOS. Mag. No. 08-3641. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. January 20, 2009. *516 Lakshmi Srinivasan Herman, US Attorney's Office, Newark, NJ, for Plaintiff. Howard W. Bailey, Michael A. Orozco, Bailey & Orozco, LLC, John H. Yauch, Offi
Falk v. KEENE CORPORATIONpublic domain
53 Wn. App. 238 (1989) 767 P.2d 576 JOHN J. FALK, ET AL, Appellants, v. KEENE CORPORATION, ET AL, Respondents. No. 21302-4-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. January 17, 1989. William S. Bailey and Schroeter, Goldmark & Bender, for appellants. Steven T. Johnson and Gibson, Dunn & Crutch
Sazerac Co., Inc. v. Falkpublic domain
861 F.Supp. 253 (1994) SAZERAC COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. Ferdie A. FALK, and Robert Baranaskas, Defendants. No. 94 Civ. 2330 (RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 18, 1994. *254 *255 Kirkland & Ellis, New York City (Terrence J. Galligan, of counsel), for plaintiff.<
Wilson v. Falkpublic domain
McHUGH, Circuit Judge. Colorado state prisoner Terrance D. Wilson was stabbed eleven times by a fellow inmate while incarcerated at the Li-món Correctional Facility in Limón, Colorado. Having survived the attack, Mr. Wilson brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Frances Falk, James Fox, Steven Frank, and Sherwyn Phillip—
Falk, John Ray Jr.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-77,071 JOHN RAY FALK, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 27347 IN THE 278TH DISTRICT COURT WALKER COUNTY Per curiam.
William J. Hone & Falk & Fish, L.L.P. v. Hanafinpublic domain
105 S.W.3d 15 (2002) WILLIAM J. HONE AND FALK & FISH, L.L.P., Appellants, v. Bernard M. HANAFIN, Appellee. No. 05-01-00897-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. March 14, 2002. *16 Claire Collins Schwarz, Mark A. Ticer, Law Office of Mark A. Ticer, Dallas, for appellant. Gerald Conley, Andrews & Kurth, Dallas, for
Falk v. Perezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBEN CASTILLO, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Sonia Falk brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) against Defendants Kane County Sheriff Patrick B. Perez (“Defendant Perez”), Kane County Sheriffs Deputy Brian Lewis (“Defendant Lewis”), and Wells Fargo Bank (‘Wells Fargo”) alleging violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. (R.
Falk v. Fannie Maepublic domain
HUNTER, Justice. The case before us involves a dispute between Michael Falk, Trustee of the Charlotte Falk Irrevocable Trust (Trust), and the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), concerning which party’s mortgage hen on the Ridgewood Apartments, located in Guilford County, has priority status. The solution to the dispute involves application of our State’s “life of
Falk v. Keene Corp.public domain
113 Wn.2d 645 (1989) 782 P.2d 974 JOHN J. FALK, ET AL, Respondents, v. KEENE CORPORATION, ET AL, Petitioners. No. 55945-7. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. October 31, 1989. *646 Hills, Clark, Martin & Peterson, by Mark S. Clark, Theresa R. Wagner, and Gregory E. Keller; Willi
Christopher Bey v. Adam Falkpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0308p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER LEE-MURRAY BEY, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │
Dr. Falk Pharma Gmbh v. Generico, LLCpublic domain
O'Malley, Circuit Judge. ORDER At issue are three motions to disqualify Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP as counsel for Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("Mylan") in three appeals before this court. Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. ("Valeant-CA") and Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Salix") move to disqualify in Valeant Pharmaceuticals
United States v. Huetherpublic domain
673 F.3d 789 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ray Leon HUETHER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-1964. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: December 16, 2011. Filed: March 9, 2012. *792 Neil Fulton, AFPD, argued, Pierre, SD, Orell D. Schmitz, AFPD, Mark Falk, AFPD, on the b
Falk v. Fannie Maepublic domain
McCullough, Judge. Michael A. Falk (“plaintiff’), as trustee of “The Charlotte Falk Irrevocable Trust,” a trust dated 26 October 1989 having the tax identification number 65-6043718 (the “Trust”), appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Fannie Mae, also known as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”). For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgme
Falk v. Sinclairpublic domain
692 F.Supp.2d 147 (2010) Sonja FALK, Petitioner, v. Jon Alan SINCLAIR, Respondent. Civil No. 09-346-P-S. United States District Court, D. Maine. March 19, 2010. *149 E. James Burke, Christopher M. Northrop, Stephanie Green, Cumberland Legal Aid Clinic, Portland, ME, for Petitioner. Donna L. Martin, Law Office of Donna Mart
United States v. Pumpkin Seedpublic domain
572 F.3d 552 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jason Adam PUMPKIN SEED, Appellant. No. 08-2399. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: February 10, 2009. Filed: July 16, 2009. *554 Mark Falk, AFPD, argued, George E. Grassby, AFPD, on the brief, Rapid City, SD, for appellant.
United States v. Wisecarverpublic domain
644 F.3d 764 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Marc Sean WISECARVER, Appellant. No. 10-2849. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 17, 2011. Filed: June 30, 2011. *768 Gary G. Colbath, Jr., AFPD, argued, Mark Falk, on the brief, Rapid City, SD, for appellant. Mark E.