Cases

Opinion by President Judge Crumlish, Jr., The Department of Transportation (DOT) and Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) cross-appeal an Allegheny County Common Pleas Court order denying post-trial motions and entering judgment in favor of Conrail. We affirm. A landslide removed the soil supporting a railroad bed next to a DOT-maintained highway and caused Conrads railroad tracks to shif

122 F.Supp.2d 688 (2000) Ronnie Lee ABBOTT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. A-BEST PRODS. CO., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:2000CV86. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg Division. November 15, 2000. *689 Carl N. Frankovitch, Frankovitch, Anetakis, Colantonio & Simon, Weirton, WV, Mark T. Wade, Wade,

43 F.Supp.2d 794 (1998) Joann HOLLAR, Individually and as Fiduciary of the Estate of David Hollar, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. No. 1:97 CV 00667. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 7, 1998. *795 *796 *

OPINION AND ORDER MARSH, Chief Judge. The automobile driven by the wife plaintiff, Anna Zunich, was struck by Baltimore and Ohio diesel units at a grade crossing shortly after noon on January 10, 1966; Anna and her two children were injured. Following the pretrial conference, the defendant railroad moved for summary judgment in connection with Anna’s claim for damages on the ground that she was guilty

OPINION OF THE COURT COWEN, Circuit Judge. In this appeal of a personal injury action arising out of injuries caused by an allegedly defective tractor, we are asked to decide whether the district court erred: (1) in allowing plaintiffs to introduce evidence concerning a history of tractor rollovers when the accident at issue did not involve a tractor rollov

OPINION OF THE COURT WEIS, Circuit Judge. In this suit for the refund of freight payments, the district court decided that the shipper’s claims fell within the statutory definition of “overcharges,” and that the appropriate statute of limitations had not expired. We agree and will affirm the judgments in favor of the shipper. The district court further held that, in balancing the equities, prejudgment int

Opinion by Senior Judge Barbieri, Dominie C. Backowski, Claimant, appeals here the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board *341(Board), which sustained a decision of a referee in dismissing a claim petition for compensation filed by Claimant. The referee’s findings are conflicting. Compensable disability is established by th

NICHOLAS, P.J., This opinion is necessitated by plaintiffs’ appeal to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania from our order dated September 8, 1995, which denied plaintiffs’ petition to open judgment of non pros. On April 30, 1990, plaintiffs filed their complaint seeking recovery for injuries allegedly sustained in a traffic accident. They were represented by Joel D. Caney, Esquire. Defendant was served

569 F.Supp. 948 (1983) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. NORTH SIDE DEPOSIT BANK, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY VEHICLE LEASING, INC., North Side Deposit Bank, Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 80-487, 81-551. United States District Court, D. Pennsylvania. February 14, 1983. *949

[J-81-2016] [MO: Dougherty, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 718 CAP : Appellee : Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence : entered on 1/6/2015 in the Court of

[J-8A-C-2025] [MO: McCaffery, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 38 EAP 2024 : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of the : Superior Court at No. 788 EDA : 2022 entered on November 30, v.

[J-8A-C-2025] [MO: McCaffery, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 38 EAP 2024 : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of the : Superior Court at No. 788 EDA : 2022 entered on November 30, v.

102 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 611 (1986) 519 A.2d 1058 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Appellant v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Appellee. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Appellant v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Appellee. Nos. 1634 C.D. 1985 and 1829 C.D. 1985. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

[J-8A-C-2025] [MO: McCaffery, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 38 EAP 2024 : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of the : Superior Court at No. 788 EDA : 2022 entered on November 30, v.

334 F.Supp. 551 (1971) Margaret A. PETERSON, Plaintiff, v. Rosalie DICKISON, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 71-299. United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania. November 19, 1971. *552 Raymond L. Brennan, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff. Gary F. Sharlock, of Mercer & Buckley, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

878 F.2d 686 14 Fed.R.Serv.3d 868 The CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANYv.UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, USS Corporation, USSDivision (formerly United States SteelCorporation), Appellant in 88-3775UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATIONv.Robert W. BLANCHETTE, Richard C. Bond and John H. MacArthur,Trustees of the Property of the Penn Central TransportationCompany; the Penn Central Transpor

234 Pa. Superior Ct. 198 (1975) Noon v. Knavel (et al., Appellant). Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 13, 1974. April 22, 1975. *202 Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN DER VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ. Charles Kirshner, with him R. Thomas Strayer, and Rosenberg, Kirshner &

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: Judge Newman’s opinion for the majority in this important case is characteristically thoughtful and comprehensive. I concur in much of it. I cannot agree, however, with the majority’s holding that the Trial Courts’ approval of the treatment of the health claimants in the restructured Man-ville Personal Injury S

982 F.2d 721 61 USLW 2365, 27 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 1636,24 Fed.R.Serv.3d 686, 23 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 1237,Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,047 In re JOINT EASTERN AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION.In re JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, Debtor.Bernadine K. FINDLEY, as Executrix of the Estate of HillardFindley, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,Putative Class Members Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation,et al., Ap

Woodside, J., The question here involves the priority of two liens on a certain tract of real estate in Cumberland County. Title to the premises in question, known as 222 South Front Street, Wormleysburg, was held by William F. Martin and Lillie B. Martin, his wife, as tenants by entireties, prior to April 18, 1928. On that day the Mechanics Trust Company entered judgment on a note in Cumberland County in the amo