⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Mark E Borchardt”

Ott v. Borchardtpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998-03-31 · Published · cited 8× · 711 N.E.2d 1066; 127 Ohio App. 3d 152
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 154 This is an appeal by the plaintiffs-appellants, Raymond and Carolyn Ott, from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Seneca County granting the motion for summary judgment of defendant-appellee Westfield Insurance Company and dismissing appellant's complaint. Appellants were injured in an accident as pa
State v. Borchardtpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997-03-31 · Published · cited 3× · 694 N.E.2d 152; 118 Ohio App. 3d 857
This appeal, submitted on the accelerated calendar, is being considered pursuant to App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12. Pursuant to Loc.R. 12(5) we elect to render decision by written opinion. Defendant-appellant, Elizabeth K. Borchardt, appeals the sentence of the Tiffin Municipal Court permanently revoking her driver's license following her conviction for vehicular homicide, a violation of R.C. 2903.07. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the sentence
District Court, D. Maine · 2018-06-26 · Published · cited 1× · 325 F. Supp. 3d 953
Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge In September 2014, a fire destroyed the home of plaintiffs Todd and Michele Borchardt and their adult children, plaintiffs Danielle Shaver and Dillon Borchardt (collectively, "the Borchardts"). The Borchardts submitted a claim to defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company ("State Farm"), their homeowners insurer, for the value of the home and the personal items that were destroyed
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012-07-10 · Published · cited 4× · 684 F.3d 1037; 2012 WL 2775012; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 14084
BRISCOE, Chief Judge. Borchardt Rifle Corporation (Borchardt) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment affirming the revocation of its federal firearms license. After an initial compliance inspection, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) granted Borchardt a license in 2002. The ATF conducted a second inspection in 2007 and detected numero
State v. Borchardtpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007-01-12 · Published · cited 23× · 914 A.2d 1126; 396 Md. 586; 2007 Md. LEXIS 1
RAKER, Judge. Lawrence Michael Borchardt was tried by a jury in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County in May 2000, and convicted of two counts of first degree murder and felony murder, and robbery with a deadly weapon. The jury sentenced Borchardt to death. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed the judgment and sentence. Borchardt v. State, 367 Md. 91, 786 A.2d 631 (2
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010-02-27 · Published · cited 2× · 727 F. Supp. 2d 1146; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24024; 2010 WL 1141360
727 F.Supp.2d 1146 (2010) BORCHARDT RIFLE CORP., Plaintiff, v. Nancy F. COOK, Director of Industry Operations, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Defendant. No. CIV 08-1188 JB/WDS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. February 27, 2010. *1147 John James D'Amato, Jr., Albuquerque, NM, Richard E. Gardiner,
Borchardt v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001-12-13 · Published · cited 74× · 786 A.2d 631; 367 Md. 91; 2001 Md. LEXIS 941
WILNER, Judge. In May, 2000, appellant, Lawrence Borchardt, Sr. was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County of two counts each of premeditated first degree murder, first degree felony murder, and robbery with a deadly weapon. Those convictions emanated from the murder and robbery of Joseph and Bernice Ohler in their home in Baltimore County on November 2
Hackos v. Smithpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008-12-16 · Published · cited 0× · 669 S.E.2d 765; 194 N.C. App. 557; 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 2235
JACKSON, Judge. This is a companion appeal to 07-1543 filed simultaneously herewith.1 Dara Lynn Hackos ("plaintiff") appeals the 28 September 2007 denial of her motion to reconsider the 16 July 2007 granting of summary judgment in favor of David Curtis Smith, David Curtis Smith & Associates, PLLC, and Michelle C. Mark ("defendants") which is the subject of her companion appeal. For the reasons stated
HACKOS v. Smithpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008-12-16 · Published · cited 1× · 669 S.E.2d 761; 194 N.C. App. 532; 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 2253
669 S.E.2d 761 (2008) Dara Lynn HACKOS, Plaintiff, v. David Curtis SMITH, David Curtis Smith & Associates, PLLC, Michelle C. Mark, Defendants. No. COA07-1543. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 16, 2008. *762 Goodman, Allen & Filetti, PLLC, by Kerri Borchardt Taylor, Pro Hac Vice, and A. William Charters, and El
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2018-07-26 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-16-00339-CV ____________________ SAM RAYBURN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, Appellant V. RALPH J. GILLIS, GILLIS BORCHARDT & BARTHEL LLP, OBAIN ASSOCIATES LIMITED AND THE
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2009-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-08-00028-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2009-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-08-00028-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG SAN JACINTO TITLE SERVICES OF CORPUS CHRISTI, LLC AND MARK S. SUVER, Appellants, v. LIZA A. PRATT, Appellee. On appeal from the 2
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946-03-04 · Published · cited 8× · 154 F.2d 522; 33 C.C.P.A. 1023; 69 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 382; 1946 CCPA LEXIS 450
154 F.2d 522 (1946) WHITTIER v. BORCHARDT. Patent Appeal No. 5076. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. March 4, 1946. Rehearing Denied May 3, 1946. *523 Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, and Ralph M. Snyder and William A. Snow, both of Chicago, Ill. (S. B. Michael, of Washington, D. C. and Rummler, Rummler
In Re Alex C.public domain
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009-04-08 · Published · cited 0× · 969 A.2d 399; 158 N.H. 525
969 A.2d 399 (2009) In re ALEX C. No. 2008-198. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: March 12, 2009. Opinion Issued: April 8, 2009. *400 Kelly A. Ayotte, attorney general (Stephen D. Fuller, senior assistant attorney general, on the brief, and Thomas E. Bocian, assistant attorney general, orally), for the State. <
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-08-03 · Published · cited 0× · 340 F. App'x 708
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Keith Hoover appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, /.), granting defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, proceedings below, and specification of issues on appeal. *710While the district court reje
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-08-03 · Published · cited 4× · 340 F. App'x 708
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Keith Hoover appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, /.), granting defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, proceedings below, and specification of issues on appeal. *710While the district court reje
Mace v. Willispublic domain
District Court, D. South Dakota · 2017-04-21 · Published · cited 8× · 259 F. Supp. 3d 1007
MEMORANDUM OPINION VERONICA L. DUFFY, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Kieshia Mace brings suit against Corey Willis; Kickbox Dakota, LLC; and David Borchardt. Ms. Mace asks for damages for violation of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”), 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301-4335.1 FINDINGS OF
Washington Supreme Court · 2012-10-18 · Published · cited 442× · 175 Wash. 2d 696; 286 P.3d 673
Wiggins, J. ¶46 (dissenting) — I agree with the lead opinion that the prosecutor in this case improperly expressed a personal opinion about Edward Glasmann’s guilt when he superimposed the words “guilty, guilty, guilty” over Glasmann’s mug shot in a PowerPoint display. But I disagree that all of Glasmann’s convictions should be overturned as a result. While it may appear at first glance that the prosecutor’s error is grave enough
MacKenna v. Pantanopublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-05-10 · Published · cited 0× · 469 Ill. Dec. 149; 222 N.E.3d 910; 2023 IL App (1st) 210486
2023 IL App (1st) 210486 No. 1-21-0486 Opinion filed May 10, 2023 Third Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT __
State v. Hortonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016-07-26 · Published · cited 10× · 195 Wash. App. 202; 380 P.3d 608
Melnick, J. ¶ 1 William Charles Horton Jr. appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm in the first degree and murder in the first degree. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude that article I, section 9 of the Washington Constitution does not afford greater protections than the United States Constitution regarding *206waiver of counsel and t