Cases

STV's assertion is not supported by any evidence concerning Mallet's assignments and is therefore insufficient to raise a genuine dispute. There is also no evidence to raise a genuine dispute that Morphos's assignments were obtained by fraud; there is no evidence that a misrepresentation was made.12 Morphos declares that he assumed he was signing a renewal of assignment of rights but that no one told him it was a renewal. Morpho

Philip M. Hess, Chief Judge Introduction Tucker Parking Holdings, LLC and Tucker' Parking Equities, LLC (collectively “Tucker”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of Central Parking System of Missouri, LLC (“Central”). This case arises out of a dispute between the parties over who is responsible for the expenses relating to the near-collapse of a parking garag

NUMBER 13-21-00421-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ADAM CLAYTON TUCKER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal

Opinion filed July 20, 2017 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-15-00119-CR __________ MARK PALOMO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 161st District Court

613 F.3d 592 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifford E. CLAYTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-31025. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 2, 2010. *593 Peter M. Mansfield (argued), Diane Hollenshead Copes, Fred Patrick Harper, Jr., Stephen Andrew Higginson, Asst. U.S. Attorneys, New Orlean

MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. Plaintiffs Adrienne Tucker and Maurice Holmes are facing foreclosure on their home. They failed to make payments under their original mortgage loan after they began making payments under what they believed to be a valid loan modification agreement. They filed suit in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County against their current loan servicer, D

OPINION LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice. Appellant, Mark Anthony Tillman, was charged by indictment with capital murder. 1 Appellant pleaded not guilty. The jury found him guilty. Appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment. In one issue on appeal, appellant argues the evidence was insufficient to es

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Clayton v. Planet Travel Holdings, Inc., 2013 IL App (4th) 120717 Appellate Court GARY CLAYTON and MARSHA CLAYTON, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Caption PLANET TRAVEL HOLDINGS, INC.; PLANET TRAVEL GROUP, INC.; PLANET TRAVEL GROUP, a Partnership; PLANET TRAVEL GROUP, a Sole Proprietorship;

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 9, 2014 Session JAMES G. CLAYTON, ET AL. v. DAVIDSON CONTRACTORS, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 071016 Jeffrey M. Atherton, Chancellor No. E2013-02296-COA-R3-CV-FILED-APRIL 24, 2015 In connection with the purchase of a newly constructed home, buyers signed an application

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00099-CR RENARD TILFORD TUCKER APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Humphreys, Beales, Huff, O’Brien, AtLee, Malveaux, PUBLISHED Athey, Fulton, Ortiz, Causey, Friedman, Chaney, Raphael, Lorish, Callins and White Argued at Richmond, Virginia DANA MARK CAMANN, JR. OPINION BY v. Record No. 0243-22-4

MEMORANDUM JOHN E. JONES III, District Judge. This matter is before this Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Richards, Clayton, Woodward, and Phillips, protesting Plaintiffs equal protection claim. For the reasons articulated herein, the Court shall grant the Motion. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND By way of introduction, the equal protection

681 S.E.2d 544 (2009) Arnold CLAYTON, Employee, Plaintiff, v. MINI DATA FORMS, INC., Employer, Sentry Insurance Co., Inc., Carrier, Defendants. No. COA08-1119. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 1, 2009. *545 Seth M. Bernanke, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant. Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog LLP, by Rebecca L. T

USCA11 Case: 22-11707 Document: 152-3 Date Filed: 08/28/2024 Page: 1 of 173 In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11707 ____________________ PAUL A. EKNES-TUCKER, Rev., BRIANNA BOE, individually and on behalf of her

ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Presiding Judge. Ruth Nishida, Alison Tucker, and Nicholas White, Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Mark White (“Plaintiffs”), appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Pharmacia Corporation (“Pharmacia”). Plaintiffs contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment with respect to Plaintiffs’ cause of action brought under California law for design de

Per Curiam: The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Order entered January 12, 2017 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01233-CV DALLAS POLICE AND FIRE PENSION SYSTEM, Appellant V. MIKE RAWLINGS, SCOTT GRIGGS, ADAM MEDRANO, CASEY THOMAS, II, CAROLYN KING ARNOLD, RICKEY D. CALLAHAN, MONICA R. ALONZO,

BUTLER V. STATE COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-05-311-CR LEE THOMAS BUTLER APPELLANT V. <

JAMES L. DENNIS, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns a preliminary injunction in Jefferson Community Health Care Centers, Inc.’s (JCHCC) action against the Parish of Jefferson, Louisiana, the parish council, and its councilmembers in their official and individual capacities (collectively referred to as the “Parish” unless otherwise noted). In the underlying action, JCHCC seeks to

917 S.W.2d 530 (1996) 323 Ark. 693 Jim Guy TUCKER, Governor, et al., Appellants, v. LAKE VIEW SCHOOL DIST. NO. 25 OF PHILLIPS COUNTY, et al., Appellees. No. 95-471. Supreme Court of Arkansas. March 11, 1996. *531 Tim Humphries, Deputy Attorney General, Little Rock, for Appellants. Clayton R. Blackst