Cases

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 24-1325 _______________ DION HORTON; DAMON JONES; CRAIG BROWNLEE; RAHDNEE ODEN-PRITCHETT; TATE STANFORD; ELIJAH BRONAUGH, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, Appellants v. ADM

ACCEPTED 05-15-01480-CV 05-15-01480-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/4/2015 2:42:24 PM

MORENO, J., Concurring and Dissenting. “[T]he ‘absolute equality of all’ persons before the law [is] ‘the very foundation principle of our government.’ ” (Varnum v. Brien (Iowa 2009) 763 N.W.2d 862, 877.) In In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757, 855-856 [76 Cal.Rptr.3d 683, 183 P.3d 384] (Mar

FRANCOIS, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 19, 2015) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................215 PROCEDURAL HISTORY.........................................................217 SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD......................................221

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC.; BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD; PACIFIC GROSERVICE, D.C. No. INC., DBA Pitco Foods; CAPITOL 3:15-md-02670- HILL SUPERMARKET; LOUISE ANN JLS-MDD DAVIS MATTHEWS; JAMES WALNUM; COLIN MOORE; JENNIFER A. NELSON; ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG; LAURA OPINION CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; TREPCO IMPORTS AND

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC.; BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD; PACIFIC GROSERVICE, D.C. No. INC., DBA Pitco Foods; CAPITOL 3:15-md-02670- HILL SUPERMARKET; LOUISE ANN JLS-MDD DAVIS MATTHEWS; JAMES WALNUM; COLIN MOORE; JENNIFER A. NELSON; ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG; LAURA OPINION CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; TREPCO IMPORTS AND

ACCEPTED 13-14-00381-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 1/15/2015 3:58:21 PM

■ Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. Opinion dissenting from Part II and concurring in part and dissenting in part from Part III filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. ORDER Upon consideration of the motion of President William Jefferson Clinton and the Office of the President, to unseal the sealed portions of this Court’s opi

97 N.Y.2d 341 (2001) 767 N.E.2d 638 741 N.Y.S.2d 147 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK ROBINSON, Appellant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. PATRICK J. REYNOLDS, Respondent. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JERRY GLENN, Also Known as JEFFREY WILLIAMSON, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the

ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, concurring: I join Judge Wardlaw’s excellent opinion in full and parts III, IV and V of Judge Trott’s fine concurrence. I write separate*1212ly to confess my befuddlement that we’re not unanimous. I can’t help scratching my head at my dissenting colleagues’ dogged insistence that they’ve found a plaus

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Filed October 9, 1998 No. 98-3060 In re: Bruce R. Lindsey (Grand Jury Testimony) Consolidated with Nos. 98-3062 & 98-3072 --------- On Motion of President Clinton and the Office of the President

174 F.Supp.2d 70 (2001) In re INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 21 MC 92(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 28, 2001. *71 *72 Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel: Melvyn I. Weiss, Esq., Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Peter G.A. Saferstein, Esq., Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes &

356 F.3d 1198 In re Marciano ELLIS,Marciano Ellis, Petitioner,v.United States District Court for the Western District of Washington (Tacoma), Respondent,United States of America, Real Party in Interest. No. 01-70724. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Rehearing En Banc Granted December 5, 2002. Argued and Submitted En Banc

Paul A. Engelmayer, United States District Judge This multi-district litigation involves products liability claims regarding a contraceptive product: the Mirenaintrauterine device developed, manufactured, and distributed by defendants Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, and Bayer Oy (together, "Bayer"). The Mirena IUD functions by releasing a synthetic steroid hormone known as levonorgestrel ("LNG"). Plaintiffs

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Opposed Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights, filed August 16, 2013 (Doe. 26) (“MTD”); and (n) the Plaintiffs Opposed Motion to Amend Complaint and Memorandum Brief in Support Thereof, filed May 30, 2014 (Doc

Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #077 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinion handed down on the 19th day of December, 2016, is as follows: BY HUGHES, J.: 2012-KA-0508 STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JEFFREY CLARK (Parish of West Feliciana) For the reasons assigned herein, the defendant’s conviction and death sentence are affirmed. In the

43 Cal.4th 757 (2008) In re MARRIAGE CASES. [Six consolidated appeals.][1] No. S147999. Supreme Court of California. May 15, 2008. *765 Alliance Defense Fund, Benjamin W. Bull, Glen Lavy, Timothy Donald Chandler, Christopher R. Stovall, Dale Schowengerdt; Advocates for Faith and Freedom, Robert Henry Tyler; Law Offices of Terr

ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 6142048 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS