Cases

535 F.Supp.2d 249 (2007) 2007 DNH 156 In re TYCO INTERNATIONAL, LTD. MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION. Case No. 02-md-1335-PB. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. December 19, 2007. *252 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAUL BARBADORO, District Judge. Lead Plaintiffs[1] brought

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge: The Restaurant Corporation of America, Inc. (the “Company”) petitions for review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board determined that the Company had violated section 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), (3) by disparately enforcing its absolute no-solicitation rule by susp

Crescent Univ. City Venture, LLC v. AP Atl., Inc., 2019 NCBC 46. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 15 CVS 14745 (Master File) CRESCENT UNIVERSITY CITY VENTURE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AP ATLANTIC, INC. d/b/a ADOLFSON & PETERSON CONSTRUCTION, Defendant, v. MADISON CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.; TRUSSWAY MANUFACTURIN

MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge (dissenting in part and concurring in part): I dissent because of the disparity evident in upholding RCA's discharge of Dameron for “[i]ess than five minutes ...” (Tr. 287, 289) he spent, while “off the clock,” in union solicitation of only two cashier employees at one time, who were not actually working, while justifying those more numerous occasions when the

Mr. Justice Scott delivered the opinion of the Court: Whatever may be the decision in other States, under statutes similar or identical with ours, it is settled definitely in this State, that where a plat is executed, certified, acknowledged and recorded in conformity with the provisions of the statute of 1845, in relation to laying out towns, additions and su

McCORMICK, Circuit Judge (dissenting). At the last term of this court, I had to dissent from the judgment and opinion of the court in a homestead case coming before us from Texas. I have now to again dissent from the judgment and opinion in this case, which is a homestead case coming to us from the same state. I dissent from the views expressed and implied in the statement of the case made by the court in the opening of the opinio