Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Marjorie Ann Simpson”
Jennifer L. v. Marjorie L.public domain
Opinion HULL, J. Seven years after appellant Marjorie L. (the guardian or Marjorie) was appointed guardian of her two granddaughters, A.L. and E.L. (the minors), the trial court granted a petition to terminate the guardianship filed by the minors’ parents, respondents Jennifer L. and Richard L., Jr. (the parents, or Jennifer and Richard), following a minutes-l
in the Estate of Marjorie A. Childspublic domain
ACCEPTED 04-15-00623-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 11/23/2015 12:14:38 PM
Guardianship of Simpsonpublic domain
79 Cal.Rptr.2d 389 (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 914 GUARDIANSHIP OF Sydney SIMPSON et al., Minors. Orenthal J. SIMPSON, Petitioner and Respondent, v. Louis BROWN et al., Objectors and Appellants. No. G021264. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three. November 10, 1998. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing December 7, 1998.
Simpson v. Simpsonpublic domain
108 So.2d 632 (1959) Marjorie B. SIMPSON, Florida National Bank of Jacksonville, as Guardian of Clay Otto Simpson, a minor, and Clay Otto Simpson, Appellants, v. Clifford L. SIMPSON, as Executor of the Estate of M. Clay Simpson, deceased, substituted in the place of M. Clay Simpson, Appellee. No. 400. District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District. February 4, 1959.
Ingrid Fisher v. Halliburtonpublic domain
OWEN, Circuit Judge: This interlocutory appeal arises out of the deaths of Steven Fisher and Timothy Bell, who were civilian drivers in a United *606 States military supply-truck convoy in Iraq when insurgents attacked in April 2004. State tort claims were brought by or on behalf of spouses and fami
In Re Simon II Litigationpublic domain
212 F.Supp.2d 56 (2002) In re SIMON II LITIGATION. Nos. 00-CV-5332, 98-CV-0675, 98-CV-1492, 98-CV-3287, 99-CV-1988, 99-CV-6142, 00-CV-2340, 00-CV-4442, 00-CV-4632, 02-CV-0599. United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 16, 2002. Weitz & Luxenberg, New York City, by Perry Weitz, Robert J. Gordon, Jerry Kristal, Richard L. Akel, Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann, & Bern
General Refractories Co. v. First State Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM LUDWIG, District Judge. All of the eleven defendants in this action again move for summary judgment (doc. no. 346 sealed).1 Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. *384See footnote 1 for case history. Jurisdiction is diversity. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiff General Refractories Company (GRC), a manufactu
United States v. Flores-Martinezpublic domain
677 F.3d 699 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Antonio FLORES-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-40376. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 16, 2012. *701 Julia Bowen Stern, Renata Ann Gowie, James Lee Turner (argued), Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Marjorie
In Re Simon II Litigationpublic domain
172 F.Supp.2d 375 (2001) In Re SIMON II LITIGATION No. 00-CV-5332. Related to: 97-CV-7658, 98-CV-0675, 98-CV-1492, 98-CV-3287, 99-CV-6142, 99-CV-7392, 00-CV-2340, 00-CV-4442. United States District Court, E.D. New York. November 7, 2001. *376 Weitz & Luxenberg, New York City, by Perry Weitz, Robert J. Gordon, Jerry Kristal, Richard L
Taylor v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.public domain
658 N.W.2d 127 (2003) 468 Mich. 1 Tamara TAYLOR and Lee Anne Rintz, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Tamara Taylor and Lee Anne Rintz, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Gate Pharmaceuticals, Defendant-Appellant. Judith H. Robards and Kenneth W. Robards, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Gate Pharmaceuticals, Defendant-Appellant. Tamara Taylor and Lee Anne Rintz, Plaint
In Re Simon II Litigationpublic domain
212 F.Supp.2d 53 (2002) In re SIMON II LITIGATION. No. 00-CV-5332. United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 11, 2002. Weitz & Luxenberg, New York City, by Perry Weitz, Robert J. Gordon, Jerry Kristal, Richard L. Akel, Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann, & Bernstein, New York City, by Steven E. Fineman, Thomas M. Sobol, Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann, & Bernstein, San F
Britt v. Riceland Petroleum Co.public domain
Alan David Ezkovich, Ezkovich & Co., LLC, 650 Poydras Street-Suite 1220, New Orleans, LA 70130, Telephone: (504) 593-9899, COUNSEL FOR: Defendant/Appellant-Mt. Hawley Insurance Company Stephen Douglas Baker, Law Office of Stephen Baker, 412 West University Avenue-Suite 101, Lafayette, LA 70506, Telephone: (337) 235-8298, COUNSEL FOR: Defendant/Appellee-Riceland Petroleum Company Sidney Wallis Degan, III, Catherine N. Thigp
Stephen Smith and Audrey Smith, husband and wife v. Board of County Commissioners of Park County, Wyomingpublic domain
VOIGT, Justice. [11] The Smiths contend that an unlawful taking occurred when the Board of County Commissioners of Park County (the Board) declared the Smiths' private driveway to be part of a county road. Failing to obtain any relief through administrative pro *948 ceedings, the Smiths sued the Boa
DeLoach v. Airdpublic domain
989 So.2d 652 (2007) Dennis R. DeLOACH, Jr., and Peter T. Hofstra, Petitioners, v. Hugh AIRD, Bob (G.W.R.) Anderson, Ian Anderson, Anne Marie Anderson, Armand Archambault, Beverly Armitage, Earnest Armitage, Elias Attar, Jossee Attar, Barbara Bell, Bernice Belliveau, Gail Beron, Kenneth Blanchette, Lucille Blakenship, Harry Blinkhorn, Elizabeth Blinkhorn, John Boitos, Robert Bowman, Terri Brothers, Franklin Wannemacher, Lise Brunet, James Burgess
Commonwealth v. Hicks, C., Aplt.public domain
*472CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR, Concurring I join Parts I, II and IV of the majority opinion and concur in the result relative to the balance. As to Part III, I agree with Justice Donohue that various majority opinions of this Court, like the decisions of a number of other courts, have incorrectly blended various distinct grounds for releva
Clark v. Deloitte & Touche LLPpublic domain
34 P.3d 209 (2001) 2001 UT 90 Deveaux CLARK and Marjorie Clark, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, formerly known as Touche Ross & Co., Defendants and Appellees. No. 990772. Supreme Court of Utah. October 19, 2001. *210 Steven P. Simpson, Bluff, Jesse C. Trentadue, Salt Lake City,
74 F.Supp.2d 213 (1999) THE NATIONAL ASBESTOS WORKERS MEDICAL FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS, INC., et al., Defendants. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Philip Morris, Incorporated, et al., Defendants. Nos. 98 CV 1492, 98 CV 3287. United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 2, 1999.
Marr. of Fickepublic domain
Opinion BEDSWORTH, J. INTRODUCTION In this dissolution action, the trial court awarded custody of a couple’s two teenage children to the mother 95 percent of the time. The court found the father makes $8,088 a month, including $4,112 net from two separate property rentals. The mother, by contrast, had an income of $251 a month from a s
Brailsford v. Brailsfordpublic domain
380 S.C. 443 (2008) 669 S.E.2d 342 Donna F. BRAILSFORD, Individually and as Personal Representative and Trustee under the Will of William M. Brailsford, Deceased, and Kelly T. Brailsford, an Incapacitated Person by her Guardian ad Litem, Plaintiffs, Of Whom Donna F. Brailsford, Individually and as Personal Representative and Trustee under the Will of William M. Brailsford, Deceased is the Appellant, v. John F. BRAILSFO
In Re Simon II Litigationpublic domain
212 F.Supp.2d 57 (2002) In Re SIMON II LITIGATION. Nos. 00-CV-5332, 98-CV-0675, 98-CV-1492, 98-CV-3287, 99-CV-1988, 99-CV-6142, 00-CV-2340, 00-CV-4442, 00-CV-4632, 02-CV-0599. United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 16, 2002. Weitz & Luxenberg, New York City by Perry Weitz, Robert J. Gordon, Jerry *58 Kristal, Richard L. Ak