Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Marisa Owens Cox”
United States v. Owenspublic domain
U.S. v. Owens IN THE CASE OF UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Jerry W. OWENS, Airman Basic U.S. Air Force, Appellant No. 98-0133 Crim. App. No. 32468 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued November 4, 1998 Decided August 9, 1999 GIERKE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which COX, C.J., CRAWFORD, and EFFRON, JJ., joined. SULLIVAN, J., filed an opinion co
Sokoloff v. Schorpublic domain
Sokoloff v Schor (2019 NY Slip Op 06176) Sokoloff v Schor 2019 NY Slip Op 06176 Decided on August 21, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Dillon, J.P., J. Published by New Yo
Authors Guild v. Google Inc.public domain
770 F.Supp.2d 666 (2011) THE AUTHORS GUILD et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. No. 05 Civ. 8136(DC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 22, 2011. *669 Boni & Zack LLC, by Michael J. Boni, Esq, Joanne Zack, Esq., Bala Cynwyd, PA, for Author Plaintiffs. Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, by Bruce P.
Justine Briggs v. Merck Sharp & Dohmepublic domain
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: The Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), Pub.L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (2005), authorizes the removal to federal court of “mass actions.” 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(ll)(A), (B). “Mass actions” are civil actions in which “monetary relief claims of 100 or more persons are proposed to be tried jointly on the ground that the plaintiffs’ claims involve common ques
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Abshirepublic domain
OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti