Cases

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kevin J. Kerrigan, J.), dated February 20, 2014. The order granted that branch of the motion of the defendant third-party defendant MTA Bus Company which was for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and, in effect, denied as academic those branches of the motion of the defendant third-party defendant MTA Bus Company which were for summary

7 So.3d 595 (2009) SMITH LAKE SHORES VILLAGE, LLC, Appellant, v. MARION COUNTY, et al., Appellee. No. 5D07-3980. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. March 20, 2009. Rehearing Denied April 29, 2009. *596 David D. Eastman and Carol S. Grondzik, of Lutz, Bobo, Telfair, Eastman & Lee, Tallahassee

Mathias, Judge. *1268 [1] Pierre Smith ("Smith") was convicted in Marion Superior Court of Level 4 felony unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon. Smith appeals and argues that the State failed to prove that he constructively possessed the firearm.

OPINION FISHER, Circuit Judge: One of the most fundamental rights in our system of criminal justice is the right to trial before an impartial jury. Its common law origin can be traced back to the Middle Ages. It was enshrined in the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, and it has been embraced by the Supreme Court in numerous cases. The Court reaffirmed

PER CURIAM. Appellants, three plaintiff classes below, (“Plaintiffs”), timely appeal final summary judgments in favor of Marion County which declared .and held that Marion County may lawfully impose a special assessment (by reassessment) on property specially benefited by completed road improvements within a Municipal Services Benefit Unit (“MSBU”), specifically, the Rainbow Springs (Phase I) Improvement Area MSBU, the Lak

OPINION Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice This is an appeal from a summary judgment rendered in favor of appellees, Liberty Insurance Corp. and Justin A. Smith. In the underlying lawsuit, appellant, Kathryn Vause, sued appellees for violations of the Texas Insurance Code, violations of the Texas Labor Code, and for violations

*281 OPINION DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. This ease arises from Appellant Peggy Blizzard’s termination from her employment with Appellee Marion Technical College. Blizzard filed suit against her supervisor and the college asserting claims for age discrimination and retaliation,

5 So.3d 775 (2009) MARION COUNTY, Appellant, v. C. Ray GREENE, III and Angus S. Hastings, et al., Appellee. No. 5D07-1239. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. March 20, 2009. *776 Thomas L. Wright, County Attorney and Thomas D. MacNamara, Ocala, for Appellant. Wayne E. Flowers of Lewis Longman & Walker

591 F.3d 137 (2010) David H. MARION, as receiver for Bentley Financial Services, Inc. v. TDI INC, (f/k/a Traders and Dealers, Incorporated, f/k/a TDI, Incorporated, f/k/a The Trading Desk, Inc. and f/k/a U.S. Central Securities, Inc.); Southeastern Securities Inc.; SFG Financial Services, Inc.; Peninsula Bank; Theodore Benghiat; Casto Edwin Rivera; Jerry Manning; John Strine; Jeffrey Wilson; Joseph Marzouca v. Sanford Goldfine; S.D. Goldf

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-1820 ___________ Marion Nolan Smith, individually and * as next friend and natural guardian; * Steven Norris Smith, individually and * as next friend and natural guardian; * Sean Patrick Smith, a minor child by * and through his natural parents, *

Dissenting Opinion by: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice I respectfully dissent from the denial of appellees’ motion for rehearing. Having considered appellees’ motion, I agree, in this case, proof of a specific insurance policy providing business interruption coverage was not necessary to support the jury’s damages finding. I also agree the jury’s damages finding

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CP-00785-COA MARION TUCKER A/K/A MARION C. TUCKER APPELLANT A/K/A MARION CHRISTOPHER TUCKER v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/09/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHRISTOPHER A. COLLINS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: NESHOBA COUNTY CI

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge. In these interrelated appeals arising from a 2008 triple homicide at Doctors Hospital in Muscogee County, Plaintiffs Alan Keith Cavender, Marion Baker, and Carla Wright (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought three separate civil actions against Defendants Doctors Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Doctors Hospital, The Medical Center Hospital Authority, and Securitas Security Services, USA, Inc. (collectively, “Def

Serial: 259771 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2024-CA-00791-SCT P.K. LO YACONO, PLLC AND PAUL KELLY LOYACONO, INDIVIDUALLY FILED NOV O6 2025 v. OFFICE OF THE CLERK

*185Justice Stevens announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which The Chief Justice and Justice Kennedy join. At issue in these cases is the constitutionality of an Indiana statute requiring citizens voting in person on election day, or casting a ballot in person at the office of th

(2) Respondent shall commit no violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct or commit any criminal act during her probation. (3) Respondent shall comply with her existing course of treatment and with her criminal probation in Johnson County. (4) At the conclusion of her probationary period, Respondent shall submit an affidavit of compliance to this Court.

OPINION Opinion by: SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice. Justin Wade Smith, appellant, was convicted by a jury of continuous sexual abuse of a child, R.W., and sentenced to forty years’ confinement. He appeals and argues: (1) the evidence proving the second incident of abuse against R.W. occurred thirty days or more after the first incident

OPINION BAKER, Chief Judge. Appellant-defendant Michael A. Smith appeals the trial court’s order finding him in direct contempt of court. Smith argues that his due process rights were violated *1151because the trial court did not appoint a neutral judge to preside over the hearing at which Smith was sanctioned for his behavior and that the tria

OPINION Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Appellant father (“Father”) appeals the trial court’s order terminating his parental rights to his child, A.K,1 Father challenges: (1) the “aggravated circumstances” findings in the temporary orders; and (2) the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s finding that termination was in the best interest of the child.

Certiorari Granted, October 18, 2010, No. 32,594 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2010-NMCA-097 Filing Date: August 23, 2010 Docket No. 28,896 WALTER F. SMITH, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILL DURDEN, DENISE DURDEN, WILLIAM A. DeVRIES, and MARION DeVRIES, Defendants-Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Nan G. Nash, District Judge Law Offices of Daymon B. Ely Daymon B. Ely Albuquerque, NM William G. Gils