Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mario Vidal”
Mario Vidal v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Dec 09 2016, 9:14 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals the defense of res judicata, collat
Juliá Padró v. Vidalpublic domain
El Juez Asociado Señor Rebollo López emitió la opinión del Tribunal El 23 de agosto de 1996, Julio Francisco Juliá Padró, Stella Maris Molina Rosario y la Sociedad Legal de Ganan-ciales compuesta por ambos, demandaron, ante la Sala Superior de Bayamón del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, a Epifanio Vidal, S.E. y a Herederos Vidal Nadal, Inc., entre otros, alegando nulidad de contrato por vicios en el consen-timie
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL MARIO ENRIQUE Certiorari acogido ALVERIO DOMÍNGUEZ como Apelación procedente del Apelado Tribunal de Primera Instancia, YVETTE VALLE AVILÉS
Alejandro Gutierrez-Vidal v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.public domain
BEAM, Circuit Judge. Alejandro Gutierrez-Vidal petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his asylum and withholding of removal claims. Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), we deny the petition. I. BACKGROUND Gutierrez-Vidal, a 49-year-old
Epifanio Vidal, Inc. v. Suropublic domain
El Juez Asociado Señor Díaz Cruz emitió la opinión del Tribunal. La defensa de prescripción, de no alegarse a tiempo, se tendrá por renunciada y podrá revivirse sólo bajo circunstancias demostrativas de que la omisión no se debió a falta de diligencia y que por otro lado no ha de irrogarse substancial perjuicio en términos de una solución justa, rápida y económica a la parte contra quien se opone.
Tapia v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Azucena Tapia, Ramon Vidal Morales, Mario Alberto Torres Tapia and Victor Hugo Valdez Tapia, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008), we deny i
Tapia v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Azucena Tapia, Ramon Vidal Morales, Mario Alberto Torres Tapia and Victor Hugo Valdez Tapia, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008), we deny i
United States v. Pradopublic domain
POOLER, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns the jury instructions given with respect to Count 21 of the indictment, which charged defendants-appellants Heriberto Martinez, aka Boxer, and Carlos Ortega, aka Silencio, with aiding and abetting a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), using or carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence or possessing a firearm in furtherance of that crime, in connection with the murder of Ma
Lydia L v. Vidal Lpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Bruce M. Kaplan, J. On July 20, 1977, the Commissioner of Social Services, as assignee of Lydia L, petitioned the court to have Vidal L declared the father of Cynthis L, a child born to Lydia L on August 21,1964. Respondent’s attorney interposed the defense of the Statute of Limitations, and moved to dismiss the petition because it had been brought more than 10 yea
People v. Crislerpublic domain
165 Cal.App.4th 1503 (2008) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT LEE CRISLER, Defendant and Appellant. No. C057920. Court of Appeals of California, Third District, Sacramento. August 15, 2008. *1505 Stephen M. Hinkle, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., At
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Julio Francisco Juliá Padró; Stella Maris Molina, et al. Demandantes-Recurridos Certiorari v. 2001 TSPR 15 Epifanio Vidal, S.E.; Herederos Vidal Nadal y otros Demandados-Peticionarios Número del Caso: CC-2000-423 Fecha: 14/febrero/2001 Tribunal de Circuito de Apelaciones: Circuito Regional
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I Certiorari EL PUEBLO DE PUERTO procedente del RICO Tribunal de Parte Recurrida Primera Instancia, KLCE202500500 Sala de Mayagüez v. Crim
People v. Drozpublic domain
Wachtler, J. Defendant, charged with possession and sale of dangerous drugs, was represented by assigned counsel at trial. He was found guilty of all charges and on the appeal claims that he was deprived of his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel because of counsel’s lack of preparation for trial and ignorance of basic principles of criminal law. This complaint, frequently made, is rarely found to have mer
Herrera Tobar v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Mirza Jemina Herrera Tobar, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo whether a particular conviction constitutes an aggravated felony, Randhawa v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir.2002),
Herrera Tobar v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Mirza Jemina Herrera Tobar, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo whether a particular conviction constitutes an aggravated felony, Randhawa v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir.2002),
Figueroa Rodríguez v. Feliciano Ramospublic domain
per curiam: On account of a collision between appellee’s Mustang vehicle, driven by her, and a Chevrolet (beige) pickup, at a curve located at kilometer 6.3 of Highway No. 162 in the ward Barrio Nuevo of the municipality of Naranjito, appellee suffered injuries and loss of earnings, for which she filed a claim for damages against appellants Feli-ciano Ramos and Gaspar Berio. Appellants denied the facts concerning the accident. T
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VIII ELMER FIGUEROA ARCE Y Certiorari OTROS procedente del Tribunal de Primera Demandantes-Recurridos Instancia, Sala Superior de Caguas v.
Figueroa Rodríguez v. Feliciano Ramospublic domain
PER CURIAM: Con motivo de un choque entre el vehículo Mustang de la recurrida, guiado por ella, y una guagua “pickup”, color gris pardo {beige), Chevrolet, en una curva situada en el kilómetro 6.3 de la carretera núm. 162 en el Barrio Nuevo del municipio de Naranjito, la recurrida sufrió lesiones y pérdida de ingresos por lo que reclamó contra los recurrentes Feliciano Ramos y Gaspar. Berio en daños y perjuicio
United States v. Riverapublic domain
658 F.3d 1073 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Antonio RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50313. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 2, 2011. Filed September 23, 2011. *1074 Marc X. Carlos, Bardsley & Carlos, L.L.P., San Diego, CA, for the defe
Castro v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Giovani Castro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding him removable, inadmissible, and ineligible for adjustment of status for committing a controlled substance offense in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II), and for being present without inspection in viol