Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mario Denton”
Castillo, Ex Parte Mario Amaropublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1427-11 EX PARTE MARIO AMARO CASTILLO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND COURT OF APPEALS DENTON COUNTY C OCHRAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Co
Mario Orozco Rangel v. Amy Ledgisterpublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-23-00319-CV MARIO OROZCO RANGEL, Appellant § On Appeal from the 442nd District Court V. § of Denton County (20-5256-442) § April 18, 2024 AMY LEDGISTER, Appel
Mario Orozco Rangel v. Amy Ledgisterpublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00319-CV ___________________________ MARIO OROZCO RANGEL, Appellant V. AMY LEDGISTER, Appellee On Appeal from the 442nd District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 20-5256-442 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Bassel and Womack, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack
Castillo, Ex Parte Mario Amaropublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1427-11 <
Castillo, Ex Parte Mario Amaropublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1427-11 EX PARTE MARIO AMARO CASTILLO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND COURT OF APPEALS DENTON COUNTY A LCALA, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which J OHNSON, J
Delarosa, Carlos Mario v. Statepublic domain
MH RN! and Opinion [iled this 26th day of March, 2013. In i’he Qtnurt tit Appeahi fift1! Diitrirt nf ixa at i1zt1ta No. 05-11-00312-CR No, 05-1 1-00313-CR No. 05-1 1-00314-CR CARLOS MARIo DELAROSA, Appellant
Ex Parte Mario Amaro Castillopublic domain
02-11-172-CR
Ex Parte Mario Amaro Castillopublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00172-CR EX PARTE MARIO AMARO CASTILLO ---------- FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 1 OF DENTON COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------- Appellant Mario Amaro C
Castillo, Ex Parte Mario Amaropublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1427-11
Mario Olalde Jr. v. Statepublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00484-CR Mario Olalde, Appellant v. The State of Tex
Méndez & Co. v. Hernández Dentonpublic domain
El Juez Asociado Señor Negrón García emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Como consecuencia de inspecciones realizadas por la Divi-sión de Pesas y Medidas del Departamento de Asuntos al Consumidor (DACO), en dos negocios dedicados a la venta al por menor, se encontraron varios paquetes de una libra de granos de habichuelas coloradas y pintas y habas de lima em-paquetadas por la peticionaria Méndez & C
Presbyterian Community Hospital of Denton v. Smithpublic domain
314 S.W.3d 508 (2010) PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF DENTON d/b/a Presbyterian Hospital of Denton and Chad Hammonds, R.N., Appellants, v. Connie SMITH, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Edward Smith, Deceased, and as Next Friend for Thomas Anthony Smith, a Minor, and Douglas Smith and Stephanie Smith, Appellees. No. 2-09-288-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Wort
Hernández Denton v. Quiñones Desdierpublic domain
El Juez Presidente Señor Trías Monge emitió la opinión del Tribunal. La controversia presente gira sobre el alcance de los poderes de la antigua Administración, hoy Departamento de Asuntos del Consumidor para adjudicar, sujeto a revisión por los tribunales, querellas entre contratistas y compradores de viviendas defectuosas. Diversas Salas del Tribunal Superior han adoptado posiciones opuestas sobre el asunto y
Hernández Denton v. Western Pines Corp.public domain
El Juez Asociado Señor Negrón García emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Acordamos revisar la sentencia de injunction permanente dictada por el Tribunal Superior, Sala de Mayagüez, contra la recurrente Western Pines Corp., en lo sucesivo Western, en el pleito de clases instado por el recurrido F. Hernández Denton como Director del Departamento de Asuntos del Consumidor (DACO), para beneficio de va
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Mario Alberto Bueno pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of powder cocaine. The district court reduced Bueno’s U.S. Sentencing Guidelines offense level and granted a downward departure from the guidelines, resulting in a sentence of eighteen months in prison and three years of supervised release. The government a
Mario Merritt v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2007 MARIO MERRITT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 02-05448 James M. Lammey, Jr., Judge No. W2007-00534-CCA-R3-PC - Filed January 22, 2008 A Shelby County jury convicted the Petitioner, Mario Merritt, of espe
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 29, 2014 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARIO D. TAYLOR Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sumner County No. 2011CR45 Dee David Gay, Judge No. M2013-02667-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 31, 2015 R OBERT H. M ONTGOMERY, J R., J., concurring in part, dissenting in part. I agree wi
United States v. Mario Alberto Buenopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-2289 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Mario Alberto Bueno, *
State of Tennessee v. Mario Johnsonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 7, 2006 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARIO JOHNSON Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 03-04524-25 Chris Craft, Judge No. W2005-01052-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 2, 2006 This is a direct appeal from convictions on a jury verdict of four counts of
Pueblo v. García Colónpublic domain
RESOLUCIÓN A la moción de reconsideración del peticionario Mario García Colón, “no ha lugar”. Como institución de la Rama Judicial del Gobierno, este Tribunal le da la bienvenida a la fiscalización pública y a la crítica vigorosa y libre de sus decisiones. Claro está, nues-tra función constitucional es resolver los casos ante nues-tra consideración “de forma independiente, partiendo de una comprensión cuida