Cases

[Cite as State v. Potts, 2018-Ohio-540.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 16CA010911 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE NICHALOS POTTS

963 F.Supp. 143 (1997) Earl BONOVICH, John Porter, Dean Robertson, Mario Marino, Ernie Shelton, Anthony Lenore, and Thomas Currier, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, and Supreme Knight of the Knights of Columbus, including Virgil Dechant, Knights of Columbus Agents' Pension Plan, and Plan Administrators, including W. Patrick, Donlin, and the Union Trust Company, Trustee, Defendants.<

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 1, 2015 at Nashville DONALD WAYNE MCCALL v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Crockett County No. 4256 Clayburn Peeples, Judge No. W2015-01171-CCA-R3-PC - Filed February 19, 2016 _____________________________ Donald Wayne McCall (“the Petitioner”)

687 F.Supp.2d 897 (2009) In re BISPHENOL-A (BPA) POLYCARBONATE PLASTIC PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1967-MD-W-ODS. Master No. 08-1967-MD-W-ODS. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division. November 9, 2009. *898 Daniel L. McClain, Jeffrey A. Kennard, Scharnhorst, Ast & Kennard, PC, Kansas City, MO, Marissa

OPINION PER CURIAM. This appeal concerns the efforts, over time, of three different Insurance Commissioners, acting in their capacity as statutory rehabilitators, to convert insurance rehabilitation proceedings into liquidations. Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company (“PTNA”) and its subsidiary, American Network Insurance Company (“ANIC”) (collectively, the “Companies”),

ACCEPTED 03-14-00726-CV 4089429 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

674 F.Supp.2d 756 (2009) In the matter of the COMPLAINT OF VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, owner of the Tug William E. Polle, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability. Civil Action No. 2:08cv377. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. December 17, 2009. *758 Carl D. Gray, Hunton & Williams, Norfolk, VA, John

578 S.E.2d 78 (2003) 40 Va. App. 144 Jose RODRIGUEZ v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 2078-01-4. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Alexandria. March 25, 2003. *79 Jeanne E. Klapps, Assistant Public Defender II (Thomas H. Estes, Jr., Deputy Public Defender; Office of the Public Defender, on brief), for ap

9 F.Supp.2d 1347 (1998) POPULAR BANK OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, v. BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, and Banco Popular N.A. (Florida), Defendants. No. 97-2751-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. June 5, 1998. *1348 *1349 *1350

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Chief Judge. These consolidated petitions1 are for review of a regulation promulgated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”). The regulation provides standards by which the NRC, in deciding whether to license a utility to operate a nuclear power plant, evaluates a radiological emergency plan that is prepared by the utility alone because local governments have refused to par

ORDER ORINDA D. EVANS, District Judge. Table of Contents I. Case History............................................................1201 II. Eleventh Amendment Immunity and the Ex Parte Young Doctrine............1205 III. Copyright Infringement and the Fair Use Defense........................

957 F.Supp. 607 (1997) G.B. GOLDMAN PAPER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 286, Defendant. Civil Action No. 95-7319. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 3, 1997. *608 *609 Richard E. Jaudes, St. Louis, MO, Jeffrey L. Braff, Philadelphi

856 F.2d 378 57 USLW 2175, 19 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,168 The COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES of America, and United States NuclearRegulatory Commission, Respondents.Public Service Company of New Hampshire, Scientists andEngineers for Secure Energy, Inc., Long Island LightingCompany, Nuclear Management and Resources Council, Inc., andEdison Electric Institute, Intervenors.

905 A.2d 918 (2006) Gene STILP, Appellant v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Robert P. Casey, Jr., Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Robert C. Jubelirer, President Pro Tempore of the Pennsylvania Senate, John M. Perzel, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Appellees. The Honorable John W. Herron, Appellant v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Robert C. Jubelirer, President Pro Tempore of the Senate of the Commonwealth of Pe

481 F.Supp.2d 172 (2007) Carol SMITH, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Erika Smith, Plaintiff, v. HOPE VILLAGE, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-633 (RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 12, 2007. *173 *174

GRABER, Circuit Judge, concurring: The majority and the dissent have written scholarly and complete explanations of them positions. What the length of their opinions may mask is the simplicity of the majority’s unremarkable holding: Current female employees may maintain a Rule 23(b)(2) class action against their employer, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and back pay on

10 F.Supp.2d 345 (1998) COASTAL POWER INTERNATIONAL, LTD., and Commonwealth Development Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. TRANSCONTINENTAL CAPITAL CORPORATION and Wartsila Diesel Development Corporation, Defendants. No. 96 Civ. 4057(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 24, 1998. As Amended June 30, 1998 and July 2, 1998.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

Me. Justice Maeshall, with whom Me. Justice Douglas concurs, dissenting. The Court today decides, in effect, that a State may constitutionally vary the quality of education which it offers its children in accordance with the amount of taxable wealth located in the school districts within which they reside. The majority's decision represents an abrupt departure from the mainstream of rec

Suit for salary. Upon an offer of the plaintiff to compromise, which offer was accepted by the defendant, and upon a stipulation by the parties, judgment for the plaintiff was entered in the agreed amount of $6,986.59. Customs Service Pay Case On the basis of the opinion and mandate of the Supreme Court in the case of Howard C. Myers (No. 43671) et al., 320 U. S. 561, and following the