Cases

ORDER AND REASONS IVAN L.R. LEMELLE, District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 by Harvey Gulf International Marine, LLC. (“Harvey Gulf’).1 Plaintiff filed a response in opposition.2 Defendant then filed a reply in further support of the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, to w

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1301 PUERTO RICO FAST FERRIES LLC, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SEATRAN MARINE, LLC; MR. CADE, LLC, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Jay A. García-Gregory, U.S. District Judge]

LANCE M. AFRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiff Tesla Offshore, LLC ("Tesla") and defendants Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company/OneBeacon Insurance Company ("OneBeacon") and New York Marine & General Insurance Company ("NYMAGIC"). Despite insisting that they are entitled to coverage from OneBeacon and NYMAGIC, plaintiffs International Marine, LLC and In

BARNES, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. In August 2004, Lee Ulmer purchased a 2004 Fishmaster boat with a Suzuki 225 horsepower motor, along with a Mako Marine boat trailer, from Travis Boating Center Mississippi LLC (Travis Boating), an agent of Tracker Marine LLC. After some problems with the boat, Ulmer filed a complaint on August 30, 2007, against Tracker Marine

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GREGG COSTA, District Judge. This maritime collision case presents an issue on which surprisingly little case law exists within the Fifth Circuit: if a vessel begins a journey in Texas, and then' commits a tort in another forum (in this case Louisiana), does the case “arise out of or relate to” the defendant’s Texas contacts so that personal jurisdiction exists in this forum?

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING: (1) PETITIONING CREDITOR’S CHAPTER 7 INVOLUNTARY PETITION; AND (2) DEBTOR’S MOTION TO DISMISS JEFF BOHM, Chief Judge. I. Introduction The Court writes this Memorandum Opinion to underscore that: (1) there is split case law on how to satisfy certain elements required to obtain an order granting an involuntary petition; and (2) the drafting of a j

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-1189 (Filed: 17 February 2022) *************************************** MARINE INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, * LLC, * * Plaintiff, * Summary Judgment; Termination for *

Opinion issued March 23, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00650-CV ——————————— RYAN MARINE SERVICES, INC. AND TRIONICS, LLC, Appellants V. ANTHONY HOFFMAN, AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RAYMOND

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL D. CASTRO, an individual, No. 17-35703 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:17-cv-00008- RSL TRI MARINE FISH COMPANY LLC, an unknown entity; TRI MARINE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, an ORDER AND unknown entity; CAPE MENDOCINO AM

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL D. CASTRO, an individual, No. 17-35703 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:17-cv-00008- RSL TRI MARINE FISH COMPANY LLC, an unknown entity; TRI MARINE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, an OPINION unknown entity; CAPE MENDOCINO FISHING LP, a

OPINION EASTAUGH, Senior Justice. I. INTRODUCTION Sean Janes, a railroad conductor, was injured while railears were being loaded onto a barge built to transport railcars and non-rail cargo at the same time. The railcars were rolling on tracks which ran from the stern to the bow of the barge. As the railcars approached non-rail cargo th

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff-Appellant MLC Fishing, Inc. (“MLC”) appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing for want of subject matter jurisdiction MLC’s complaint seeking exoneration from or limitation of liability pursuant to the Exoneration and Limitation of Liability Act (the “Limitation Act”), 46 U.S.C. § 30501 et seq. MLC owns the fishing vessel “Ca

The opinion filed on February 27, 2019, and appearing at 916 F.3d 1191, is amended. On page 13, is replaced with , and is replaced with . An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. With t

*1022OPINION AND ORDER ACOSTA, United States Magistrate Judge: Introduction This action addresses the alleged obligations of numerous insurance companies to defend and indemnify third-party plaintiffs The Marine Group,' LLC (“Marine Group”); Northwest Marine, Inc. (“NW Marine”); Northwest Marine Iron Works (“Marine I

OPINION Gordon, Judge: Plaintiff Jedwards International, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Jedwards”) challenges the classification by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) of Jedwards’ entries of imported krill oil under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). Before the court are the cross-motions for summary judgmen

Opinion issued March 23, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00650-CV ——————————— RYAN MARINE SERVICES, INC. AND TRIONICS, LLC, Appellants V. ANTHONY HOFFMAN, AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RAYMOND

Neel, Stephen E., J. Plaintiffs Sea Rover Fishing, Inc., Kathryn Ann Fishing, Inc., North Queen Fishing, Inc., and Leonard Ingrande (collectively, plaintiffs) move for (1) an order enjoining the defendant, Paul Diodati, Director of the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (Director), from implementing a condition on permits that prohibits purse seining for Atlantic bluefin tuna (bluefin tuna) in Cape Cod Bay for the 2008 se

637 F.3d 259 (2011) DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC; Makhteshim Agan of North America, Inc.; Cheminova, Inc. USA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE; Eric C. Schwaab, Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-1968. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: October 27, 2010. Decided: March 2, 2011. *260

Case: 22-30311 Document: 00516933851 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/17/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED Octo

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge Camille L. Velez-Rive, (Docket 77). Having made an independent examination of the entire record in this case, the Court ADOPTS IN FULL the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. I. STANDARD A district court may refer a p