Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Marilyn E. Morgan”
Williams v. Morganpublic domain
Eldridge, Judge. Appellee/plaintiff Daniel Morgan brought suit against appellant/ defendant Marilyn Williams for damages he incurred when he purchased a stolen vehicle from her and was subsequently arrested therefor. In the complaint, Morgan alleged that in 1999, Williams offered to help him obtain a hurricane or storm damaged vehicle at a discount from an east coast car lot where a relative or friend of Williams worked. Morga
Johnny M. Young v. Charlie E. Jones, Warden Cos Ii--James E. Carver Co I--Marilyn Gorumpublic domain
DUBINA, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Johnny M. Young (‘Young”), an Alabama prison inmate, appeals from the district court’s judgment entered in favor of appellees, Warden Charlie E. Jones (“Warden Jones”) and Correctional Officers James E. Carver (“Captain Carver”) and Marilyn Gorum (“Officer Gorum”), on Young’s pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Based upon our ind
Morgan v. Statepublic domain
321 Ga. 495 FINAL COPY S25A0412. MORGAN v. THE STATE. LAGRUA, Justice. Deangelo Deshawn Morgan challenges his 2023 convictions for the fatal shooting of Sabron Mosby and aggravated assault of Donoven King.1 Morgan was tried separately from his co-indictees, Cleavanta Jerrideau and Glenn Darius Smith, both of whom were acquitted. In this appeal, Morgan contends that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding (1) evidence that allegedly showed
William J. v. Marilyn J.public domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS William J., Respondent Below, Petitioner FILED November 16, 2018 vs) No. 17-1013 (Randolph County 15-D-63) EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL
A.V.E.L.A., Inc. v. Estate Of Marilyn Monroe, LLCpublic domain
KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: In what is becoming an annual tradition, the Court here resolves the latest claims in the long-running battle among multiple parties asserting multiple claims to the intellectual property rights of Marilyn Monroe. After a trilogy of decisions resolved the parties' various motions to dismiss, this litigation progressed to discovery and, now, to cross-motions for summary judgment. Additionally,
Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 438 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-23-310 Opinion Delivered September 18, 2024 MARILYN AND SCOTT TURNBOW APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 23CV-22-1177] HIEGEL BUILDING
Giordano v. Morganpublic domain
197 Ill. App.3d 543 (1990) 554 N.E.2d 810 KIM MARIE GIORDANO, f/k/a Kim Marie Qualls, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JULIE MORGAN et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 2-89-0947. Illinois Appellate Court Second District. Opinion filed May 9, 1990. Rehearing denied June 4, 1990. *544 Michael D. Canu
Marilyn Adams v. Zimmer US, Inc.public domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 18-3011 ___________ MARILYN ADAMS, Appellant v. ZIMMER US, INC.; ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC.; ZIMMER, INC.; ZIMMER SURGICAL, INC. _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Mennen v. J. P. Morgan & Co.public domain
91 N.Y.2d 13 (1997) 689 N.E.2d 869 666 N.Y.S.2d 975 Herbert Mennen et al., Respondents, v. J. P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, Defendant, and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued October 16, 1997 Decided December 2, 1997. Levi & Lubarsky, New York
Marilyn Morgan v. Velma McCrorypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON MARILYN MORGAN, ) ) VS. Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Shelby Circuit No. 57118 T.D. ) ) Appeal No. 02A01-9604-CV-00072 FILED
Hamilton County Assessor v. Charles E. Dukepublic domain
WENTWORTH, J. This case concerns whether the Indiana Board of Tax Review erred when it determined that, for the 2009, 2010, and 2011 tax years (the “years at issue”), Charles E. Duke’s real property qualified for an educational purposes exemption, but did not qualify for a religious purposes exemption. The Court reverses the Indiana Board’s determination on the educational purpo
Morgan v. Morgan Motor Co. of Albemarlepublic domain
DAVIS, Judge. David M. Morgan (“Plaintiff’) appeals from the Opinion and Award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission (“the Full Commission” or “the Commission”) denying his workers’ compensation claim against Morgan Motor Company of Albemarle, Inc. (“Morgan Motors”). The issue before us is whether the Commission erred in concluding that Plaintiff’s accident did not arise out of — or occur in the course of — his employm
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Marilyn Flanzman v. Jenny Craig, Inc. (A-66-18) (082207) Argued November 19, 2019 -- Decided September 11, 2020 PATTERSON, J., writing for the Court. In t
Marilyn M. Clontz v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Mar 16 2017, 9:16 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK Indiana Supreme Court regarded as precedent or cited before any Court of Appeals
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2580-17T1 MARILYN FLANZMAN, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Appellant, November 13, 2018 v. APPELLATE
HENRY WOODS, District Judge. I. FACTUAL BACKGROÚND Morgan I. Doyne (“Doyne”) was hired by the Union Electric Company (“UE”) as a general superintendent responsible for overseeing the construction of the Calla-way Nuclear Power Plant. When the facility was completed, his division — the division of plant construction — was eliminated. He was reassigned to t
Rollins v. Neilson (In Re Cedar Funding, Inc.)public domain
408 B.R. 299 (2009) In re CEDAR FUNDING, INC., Debtor. Larry W. Rollins and Marie P. Rollins, individually and as Trustees of the Rollins 2002 Family Trust, dated July 1, 2002, Douglas N. Forzani and Shirley J. Forzani, individually and as Trustees of the Forzani 1994 Revocable Family Trust, dated October 26, 2004, Plaintiffs, v. R. Todd Neilson, Trustee for Debtor, Cedar Funding, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-52709
Rollins v. Neilson (In Re Cedar Funding, Inc.)public domain
398 B.R. 346 (2008) In re CEDAR FUNDING, INC., Debtor. Larry W. Rollins and Marie P. Rollins, individually and as Trustees of the Rollins 2002 Family Trust, dated July 1, 2002, Douglas N. Forzani and Shirley J. Forzani, individually and as Trustees of the Forzani 1994 Revocable Family Trust, dated October 26, 2004, Plaintiffs, v. R. Todd Neilson, Trustee for Debtor, Cedar Funding, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-52709
Rodriguez v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.public domain
809 F.Supp.2d 1291 (2011) Gabriel RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. formally doing business as Washington Mutual BK FA; MTC Financial Inc.; and Does 1-50, Defendants. Case No. 11-CV-01188-H (POR). United States District Court, S.D. California. August 25, 2011. *1293 Gabriel Rodriguez, Chula Vista, CA, pro se.
Arris International, Inc. v. Hybrid Patents, Inc.public domain
357 B.R. 802 (2006) COM21, INC., Debtor. Arris International, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Hybrid Patents, Inc. Hybrid Networks, Inc., HYBR Wireless Industries Limited, London Pacific Life & Annuity Company, and Carol Wu, Trustee of the Estate of Com21, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 03-54533-MM. Adversary No. 06-5098. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California. December