Cases

Appeals from two orders of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Richmond County (Arnold Lim, J.) (one as to each child), both dated August 3, 2015. The orders, insofar as appealed from, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that the mother permanently neglected the subject children, terminated her parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject children to the p

-------- KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge *57Appellant Ahmad Joseph pleaded guilty to theft by receiving on March 27, 2008, and was sentenced to one and a half years in prison followed by an eight-and-a-half-year suspended imposition of sentence (SIS). Ahmad's SIS was conditioned on him paying $ 800 in restitution at a rate of $ 50 per month beginning si

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

CARL L. BUCKI, Bankruptcy Judge. The trustee in this Chapter 7 proceeding has objected to half of the debtor’s claim to an exemption for $20,000 of value in a homestead. At issue is whether the New York statute allows a widow not only to claim her own exemption for up to $10,000 of property value, but also to preserve for her own benefit the similar exemption of her deceased husband. In 1960, Mary S. Joseph and

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

JOHNATHAN BOSWELL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) No. SD37077 vs. ) ) FILED: March 2, 2022 THOMAS J. O'NEIL, DWIGHT BETHUREM,) AMIE BOSWELL DEWANE, ) JAMES B. BOSWELL, ) JOSEPH A. BOSWELL, and INDEPENDENT ) STAVE COMPANY, LLC, JOHN DOE(S), ) and JANE DOE(S),

ORDER Sandra S. Beckwith, Senior Judge, United States District Court Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 16) Defendant argues that Plaintiffs claims are compulsory counterclaims that should have been raised in Plaintiffs prior state court lawsuit against Defendant. Plaintiff failed to plead his claims in that lawsuit, and his attempt to litigate them here is therefore barred. D

ORDER PER CURIAM. Glenn L. Joseph appeals from the judgment upon his convictions by a jury for burglary in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.160, RSMo 2000,1 misdemean- or stealing, in violation of Section 570.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.2009, and misdemeanor property damage, in violation of Section 569.120. We affirm. We have reviewed the bri

WOOD, Chief Judge. Joseph Sorrentino and Labron C. Neal are inmates at Illinois’s Stateville Correctional Center. They purchased several items from Stateville’s commissary, but the prison later forbade inmates to possess those items in their cells. Sorrentino and Neal were among those whose property was removed, as the new rule required. They responded by filing a proposed class

DUBINA, Circuit Judge: Appellant Joseph Symington (“Syming-ton”) appeals his conviction and 15-year mandatory minimum sentence, imposed pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), after he pleaded guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(e), for being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. Symington argues on appeal that the district court

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 13, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00137-CV DEVRY MARIE SAENZ, Appellant V. MATTHEW JOSEPH SPRINGER, Appellee On Appeal from the 280th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause

OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Joseph Curry, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Miami Fire Fighters’ and Police Officers’ Retirement Trust appeal the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiffs’ securities fraud complaint for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs a

OPINION GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge. Under what circumstances are volunteers protected from employment discrimination by Title VII? That is the primary, though not only, question presented in this case. Sister Michael Marie and Sister Mary Cabrini were disaster relief volunteers for the American Red Cross and the Ross County Emergency Managemen

OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Joseph Boulton provided testimony — as a union member at a contract arbitration proceeding — that contradicted the testimony of his superior officer in the Genesee County Sheriffs Office. He was subsequently demoted from his position as sergeant and suspended for several days without pay. Boulton brought claims aga

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Joseph Watson and Bill Harris, Missouri inmates, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant Jones in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case. We reverse and remand. In a verified complaint, Watson and Harris alleged that Jones, a female corrections officer, performed almost daily routine pat-down searches for the two m

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioners Dicenor Joseph and Marie Ania Joseph, natives and citizens of Haiti, seek review of the February 28, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the April 10, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Noel Ann Brennan, denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Dicenor Joseph, Marie Ania Joseph, Nos. A98 379 373/377 (B.

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioners Dicenor Joseph and Marie Ania Joseph, natives and citizens of Haiti, seek review of the February 28, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the April 10, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Noel Ann Brennan, denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Dicenor Joseph, Marie Ania Joseph, Nos. A98 379 373/377 (B.

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 12-1393 ___________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH KONRAD, Appellant _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

OPINION KENNY ARMSTRONG, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which J. STEVEN STAFFORD, P.J., W.S, and ARNOLD B. GOLDIN, J., joined. This is a garnishment case. Appellee bank served a writ of garnishment on the Appellant realty company for the wages of Appellee’s debtor, Walter Burke. Appellant answe

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Joseph and Mary McCormick bought a single-premium variable life-insurance policy that permits them to borrow against its cash value. Loans are secured by moving an equivalent amount from sub-accounts that the policyholder can invest to a “general account” that draws 4% interest. The policyholder owes 4.7% on any borrowed sums, so the net is 0.7% per ann