Cases

In a custody proceeding between a parent and a nonparent, “the parent has the superior right to custody that cannot be denied unless the nonparent establishes that the parent has relinquished that right due to surrender, abandonment, persisting neglect, unfitness, or other like extraordinary circumstances” (Matter of Dungee v Simmons, 307 AD2d 312, 312-313 [2003]; see Matter of Ruiz v Travis, 84 AD3d 1242 [2011]). The burden of establish

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered July 25, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim of serious injury (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]) to the right shoulder, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied. Defendants made a prima facie showing t

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-20-00091-CV __________________ SEAN DEVER, Appellant V. CHRISTOPHER VARGAS, MARIA MERCEDES VARGAS, AND CHRISTA RENNA, Appellees

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL MARÍA ISABEL VARGAS Certiorari RODRÍGUEZ Y OTROS procedente del Tribunal de Peticionaria KLCE202400327 Primera Instancia, Sala de San Juan v.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Olympic Limousine, Inc., and Ilya Trokelashvili appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated December 4, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff-respondent. The

—In an action to recover damages for *481personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berke, J.), dated June 10, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied and the complaint is reinstated. Th

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered on or about June 15, 2005, awarding plaintiff damages for past and future pain and suffering in the principal amounts of $100,000 and $200,000, respectively, upon her stipulation in lieu of a new trial on the issue of damages reducing the jury’s awards for past and future pain and suffering from $160,000 and $500,000 (over 20 years), respectively, unanimously modified, on the facts, to

ACCEPTED 15-25-00080-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/6/2025 4:07 PM NO. 15-25-00080-CV

MATT JOHNSON, CHIEF JUSTICE SHERRY WILLIAMSON, CLERK STEVE SMITH, JUSTICE 254-757-5200 LEE HARRIS, JUSTICE <tourt of ~ppeals 'QCentb ~ppeUate ~i%trict of 'QCexa% MCLENNAN COUNTY COURTHOUSE 501 WASH I NGTON AVENUE, RM. 415

ACCEPTED 15-25-00080-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 9:55 PM No. 15-25-00080-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 15-25-00080-CV Appellate Docket Number: 15-25-00080-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS Appellate Case Style: Javier Vasquez and RJT Commercial, Inc.

OPINION EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice. This is an appeal from orders of the trial court in an international child custody dispute. Appellee Hector Cuevas Vargas (“Hector”) registered the decrees of a Mexican civil court regarding custody of the child, G.S., in Texas state court and asked that they be confirmed and enforced. Appellant Maria Guadalupe Sosa Razo (“

Yesawich Jr., J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County (Nydam, J.), entered July 30, 1993, which granted petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, for custody of Jose Vargas and Mikel Vargas. Respondents are the parents of twin boys, Mikel and Jose, born May 29, 1984. Because both respondents were hospitalized for mental illness when the twins were born,

Vargas v Lee (2022 NY Slip Op 04661) Vargas v Lee 2022 NY Slip Op 04661 Decided on July 20, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

People v Vargas (2022 NY Slip Op 07460) People v Vargas 2022 NY Slip Op 07460 Decided on December 28, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

C.C. v Vargas (2022 NY Slip Op 00166) C.C. v Vargas 2022 NY Slip Op 00166 Decided on January 12, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

MINER, Circuit Judge: Appellants, Harold Orejuela and Jimmy Vargas-Toro, appeal from judgments of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, convicting them, after a jury trial, of conspiracy to manufacture, distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(A)® (1982 & Supp

Vargas v Town of Huntington (2022 NY Slip Op 04187) Vargas v Town of Huntington 2022 NY Slip Op 04187 Decided on June 29, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Maria v Concourse Estate, LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 07083) Maria v Concourse Estate, LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 07083 Decided on December 21, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ June 03, 2026 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A26A2101. MICHAEL STEPHEN SZILAGYI v. MARIA ADRIANA MARTINEZ VARGAS. In this child custody action, Michael Szilagyi and Maria Vargas mediated their dispute and agreed to a final parenting plan. On March 4, 2026, the superior court entered a consent order,