Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Maria Marquez”
Rogelio Marquez v. Maria Esther Marquezpublic domain
Rogelio Marquez v. Maria Esther Marquezpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ROGELIO MARQUEZ, ' No. 08-12-00116-CV Appellant, ' Appeal from the v. '
Maria Yanez-Marquez v. Loretta Lynchpublic domain
Petition denied by published opinion. Senior Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion in which Judge KING and Judge FLOYD joined. HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge: Maria Yanez-Marquez (Yanez), a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing her appeal from the order of an Immigration Judge (IJ) ord
Marquez v. State Department of Health Care Servicespublic domain
Opinion NEEDHAM, J. Pursuant to federal law, California’s Medi-Cal program requires Medi-Cal beneficiaries to utilize services available through any other health coverage (OHC) they may have before accessing Medi-Cal benefits. To this end, respondent State Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) maintains a database with codes that indicate whether a Medi-Ca
Rogelio A. Marquez v. Maria Cardenaspublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ROGELIO A. MARQUEZ, Appellant, v. MARIA CARDENAS, Appellee. § § §<
Marquez v. Ortegapublic domain
OPINION HALL, Judge. ¶ 1 Maria Marquez appeals from the judgment entered against her individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Alberto A. Marquez, (Marquez) on a jury verdict in favor of Rosario Ortega and Jane Doe Ortega, and Hayden Farms, Inc. (collectively, defendants). Marquez contends the trial court should not have denied her request to extend the expert disclosure and discovery d
United States v. Marquezpublic domain
602 F.Supp.2d 285 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. Maria MARQUEZ, Sarah Supernaw, Smileen Matos, Isaac Torres, and John Harley, Defendants. Criminal Action No. 08-30019-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 17, 2009. *286 Alex J. Grant, United States Attorney's Office, Springfield, MA, for Plaint
Aguas Marquez v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Rosa Maria Aguas Marquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying her motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and de novo questions of law, including claims of ineffective assistance of
Aguas Marquez v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Rosa Maria Aguas Marquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying her motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and de novo questions of law, including claims of ineffective assistance of
United States v. Marquezpublic domain
653 F.Supp.2d 1 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Jose MARQUEZ, Defendant. Criminal Action No. 99-0043 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 28, 2009. *2 Edward Charles Sussman, Maria Carlotta Mendoza, Washington, DC, for Defendant. OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Jud
United States v. Isaac Marquezpublic domain
594 F.3d 855 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel ISAAC MARQUEZ, Sr., a.k.a. Manuel Isaac Marquez-Lopez, etc., Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-12588. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. January 22, 2010. *857 Maria C. Calzon (Court-Appointed), Coral Gables, FL, for Defendant-Appellant. J
Mendoza-Marquez v. Holderpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Maria Guadalupe Mendoza-Marquez and her three children, Fernando Alonso Monterosa-Mendoza, Jorge Alberto Alfa-ro-Mendoza, and Edgargo Alexander Ca-lero-Mendoza, petition this court for a review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) which overturned the Immigration Judge’s grant of asylum and ordered the petitioners removed to El Salvador. The BIA concluded that the p
Mendoza-Marquez v. Holderpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Maria Guadalupe Mendoza-Marquez and her three children, Fernando Alonso Monterosa-Mendoza, Jorge Alberto Alfa-ro-Mendoza, and Edgargo Alexander Ca-lero-Mendoza, petition this court for a review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) which overturned the Immigration Judge’s grant of asylum and ordered the petitioners removed to El Salvador. The BIA concluded that the p
Marquez v. Duquepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Perez v. Perez, 687 So.2d 1359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
In re Marquezpublic domain
Patchett, J. This claim arises out of an incident that occurred on June 2, 1984. Maria Marquez, sister of the deceased victim, Alfonso Castro, seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act, hereafter referred to as the Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 70, par. 71 et seq. This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits su
Marquez v. Pompeopublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ALICIA MARIA MARQUEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-cv-3225 (TSC) ) MI
GENOVESE, Judge. For the reasons assigned this day in the companion case of Anthony Marquez v. Progressive Ins. Co., et al, 06-1024 (La. App. 3 Cir.12/6/06), 944 So.2d 876, this matter is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against Plaintiff/Appellant, Anthony Marquez. AFFIRMED.
People v. Marquezpublic domain
Filed 3/30/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, G061264 v. (Super. Ct. No. 20HF1486) JACKIE B. MARQUEZ, OPINION Defendant and Appe
DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution. Plaintiffs' Complaint was filed on October 19, 2010. The court granted Defendant's request for the dismissal of tax years 2006, 2007, and 2008 from Plaintiffs' Complaint in an Order issued January 20, 2011. With only the 2009 tax year properly before the court, the issue is whether Plaintiffs are entitled to cl
Guardiola Marquez v. Baraltpublic domain
Per Curiam TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Los demandados, aquí peticionarios, recurren de una resolución interlocutoria dictada en corte abierta el 3 de *139junio de 1998 mediante la cual se les anotó la rebeldía por no haber contestado la demanda y en la que se les impuso como condición para el relevo de tal anotación el pago de quinien