Cases

LOGUE, J. Jose I. Sanchez, the father, appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for the return of his minor children to Brazil under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.1 While acknowledging that the mother, Ruth E. Suasti, unilaterally removed the children from Brazil, the trial court decided that the father lacked the necessary “rights of custody” un

MEMORANDUM ** Felix Lozano Sanchez and Maria Angelica Lozano, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals denial of their motion for reconsideration challenging the underlying denial of their application for cancellation of removal due to petitioners’ failure to establish the requisite hardship to their qualifying relatives and the fem

MEMORANDUM ** Felix Lozano Sanchez and Maria Angelica Lozano, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals denial of their motion for reconsideration challenging the underlying denial of their application for cancellation of removal due to petitioners’ failure to establish the requisite hardship to their qualifying relatives and the fem

MEMORANDUM ** Herminio Flores Sanchez, Maria Mendoza Flores, Emma Flores Mendoza, and Diana Flores Mendoza, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial as untimely of their motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review. The petitioners contend that their motion to reopen, seek

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order de*706nying petitioners’ second motion to reopen removal proceedings. We review the BIA’s ruling on a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008). An alien who

FLAUM, Chief Judge. In August 1998 Luis Matos committed suicide by hanging himself in his cell at the Western Illinois Correctional Facility. Maria Matos, the deceased’s sister and guardian of his estate, and Luis Matos’s children (collectively “the Estate”) brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Illinois state law, claiming that prison warden William O’Sullivan, correctio

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order de*706nying petitioners’ second motion to reopen removal proceedings. We review the BIA’s ruling on a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008). An alien who

*654MEMORANDUM ** Maria Dolores Sanchez-Coronado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal of an Immigration Judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. Sanchezr-Coronado sought cancellation of removal on the basis of hardship to h

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ May 06, 2025 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A25A1530. JUAN ANTONIO SANCHEZ GUERRA v. CELESTE MARIA JAIME. Juan Antonio Sanchez Guerra filed a petition against Celeste Maria Jaime seeking a downward modification of the support Guerra is required to pay for the couple’s minor child. Jaime moved to dis

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying an application for cancellation of removal filed under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). Respondent’s unopposed motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted in part as to petitioner Maria Alcala Sanchez, agency no. 79-534-939. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i);

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion to reopen as untimely. Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir

*654MEMORANDUM ** Maria Dolores Sanchez-Coronado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal of an Immigration Judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. Sanchezr-Coronado sought cancellation of removal on the basis of hardship to h

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. On May 24, 2013, the Court ordered the parties to submit simultaneous briefs discussing whether subject matter jurisdiction exists. (Docket No. 69.) Two jurisdictional issues have been raised. First, whether the forum selection clause signed by Victor Martinez-Valdez (“Mr. Martinez”) upon decedent Arquidiana Arvelo-Segura (“Ms. Arvelo”)’s admission to the hospit

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. While he was reading a daily report aloud to his colleagues, Sigiefredo Sanchez mixed up the order of words and numbers, skipped over sections, and gave briefing points out of order. These were signs of a reading, disorder that Sanchez was unaware he had. Because his job required him to provide transportation information to nuclear convoys, his reading

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion for administrative closure. Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition in part and dismissal in part is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hoot

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion for administrative closure. Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition in part and dismissal in part is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hoot

MEMORANDUM ** Maria Eva Sanehez-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) deci*625sion denying her application for cancellation of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We r

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § THE STATE OF TEXAS, No. 08-24-00269-CR § Appellant, Appeal from

600 F.3d 592 (2010) Santiago PABLO-SANCHEZ, Maria Consuelo Barrera-Nava, Fany Pablo-Barrera, Reyna Pablo-Barrera, Jorge Pablo-Barrera, Santiago Pablo-Barrera, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 09-3301. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 9, 2010. Decided and Filed: March 30, 2010. ARGUED:

MEMORANDUM ** Maria Irma Pedraza De Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her motion to terminate proceedings and finding her removable for participating in alien smuggling. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agen