Cases

20 S.W.3d 809 (2000) Maria BLANCO, Appellant, v. Ernesto BOLANOS, Appellee. No. 08-99-00104-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. May 25, 2000. *810 Ken Slavin, Brower & Slavin, El Paso, for appellant. Thomas S. Hughes, El Paso, for appellee. Before Panel No. 2 BARAJAS, C.J., McCLURE, and CHEW, JJ.

Filed 11/06/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) 24APLC00150 ARIEL GONZALEZ, ) ) (Stanley Mosk Trial Court No. Plaintiff and Respondent, ) 23STUD13545)

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole The defendant, the Board of Education of the City of Chicago, has filed a motion to compel the plaintiffs to file verified answers to interrogatories as required by Rule 33(b)(3) and (5) and to set a discovery closing date. [Dkt. # 200]. The plaintiffs have filed a response in which it now claims that all issues raised by the defendant's motion have been resolved and that the plaintiffs have now produce

Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The defendant has filed its third motion to quash a subpoena in the last few weeks. The subpoena at issue this time, served on non-party Alicia Winckler, is a rerun of the subpoena the plaintiffs served on her in May 2017. [Dkt. # 146-2, # 270-1, at 2/107]. There is, perhaps, no surer sign that a case has gone on too long - more accurately, that discovery has gone on too long - than when

Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The defendant, Board of Education of the City of Chicago, has moved for a protective *1127order [Dkt. # 209] barring plaintiffs' counsel from asserting the attorney-client privilege to prevent discovery of documents and to limit testimony from a witness, Adelfio Garcia. The most troubling aspect o

NUMBER 13-12-00407-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MARIA GABRIELA MORALES, Appellant, v. JAMES CLYDE MARQUIS, Appellee. On appeal from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

REVERSE and REMANI); and Opinion Filed March 25, 2013. In The (!uurt jif Aipiat Fiftt! Jutritt DI ixa Lit 3LI1tLU No. 05-12-00233-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF JESUS AND MARIA VILLA On Appeal from the 330th ,Iudicial District Court I)allas County, Texas

Memorandum Opinion and Order Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Barbara Ferkel, Adrienne Green-Katien, Charles Saporito, Craig *828Johnson, Mishela Torres-Riley, and Francisco Otero filed this lawsuit on behalf of themselves and a proposed class of similarly situated Chicago Public School teachers against the Chicago

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 SIDNEY I. SCHENKIER, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff-relator James Youn (“relator” or “Dr. Youn”) brought this action against podiatrist Keith D. Sklar and his podiatric practice, Foot First Podiatry (“defendants” or “Dr. Sklar”), pursuant to the qui tarn provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et. seq.

*919SILVER, District Judge. Petitioner Ana Maria Lanza (“Lanza”), a native of Argentina, seeks review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the “BIA” or the “Board”) denying her petitions for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (“CAT”)

HUME, Judge. John English (claimant) contests the final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which held that Sergio and Maria Elena Zarate Bolanos (respondents) were not claimant’s statutory employers. We affirm. . Claimant, an independent contractor, was injured while washing the windows of a home in Yail titled in the name of Maria Elena Zarate Bolanos. Sergio Bolanos is Maria’s husband.

687 F.Supp.2d 1214 (2009) Jose FUNEZ, guardian ad litem for Aldo FUNEZ, Plaintiff, v. Cruz Bolanos GUZMAN; Luz Armando Barbosa, Armando Barbosa, and Maria Barbosa; Alonzo Campos, Martin Campos, and John Doe 2; Francisco Javiar Campos Chavarria, Juan Campos, and Guadalupe Chavarria; Hernan Cornejo, Manuel Cornejo-Olmeda, and Carmela Cornejo; J.L.; Ignacio Lara-Vasquez and Maria Guadalupe Lara; L.L.; Jose Magana-Macias, Irineo Munoz-Magana, and Jua

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: Maria Marta Florez-de Solis (Solis) seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of her request for political asylum under section 208(a) of the Refugee Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a) (1982), and for withholding of deportation under section 243(h) of the Immigration and Na*332tiona

NUMBER 13-14-00323-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE OCEANOGRAFIA, S.A. de C.V., OTTO CANDIES, LLC, CANDIES MEXICAN INVESTMENTS, AND OSA INTERNATIONAL On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: I. Introduction Maria Corado Rodriguez and Juan Carlos Corado Moreno (the “Corados”), a Salvadoran mother and her young son, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing their appeal of their final deportation orders and denying their motion to reopen. They claim that the BIA erred in dismissing their appeal despite the incompetence

841 F.2d 865 Maria Corado RODRIGUEZ, and Juan Carlos Corado Moreno, Petitioners,v.IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 85-7417. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued Aug. 7, 1986.Submitted Sept. 10, 1987.Decided Sept. 25, 1987.As Amended Nov. 5, 1987.As Amended on Denial of Rehearingand Rehearing En Banc Mar

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS K. MICHAEL MOORE, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant City of Miami’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10). Plaintiff Roberto Delgado filed a Response (ECF No. 15) and Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 19). The Motion is therefore ripe for review. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the Response, the Reply, the pertinent portions

Filed 9/28/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX MIGUEL CABALLERO et al., 2d Civ. No. B308126 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2020- Plaintiffs and Respondents, 00541844-CU-MM-VTA) (Ventura County) v. PREMIER CARE SIMI VALLEY LLC, Defendant and Appellant.

BERZON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) properly interpreted and applied the appropriate corroboration provision in this case. Nirmal Singh came to this country by crossing the U.S.-Canadian border in a car, without inspection. So he has no airplane ticket stub or border crossing record to prove w

MEMORANDUM OPINION Memorandum Opinion by Justice PERKES. 1 ’ ’ On June 11, 2014, relators Oceanografía, S.A. de C.V. (“Oceanografía”), Otto Candies, LLC (“Otto Candies”), Candies Mexican Investments (“Candies Mexican”), and OSA International, filed a petition for writ of ma