Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 149 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 150 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

RUIZ, Senior Judge: Vicente Lazo was convicted of one count of misdemeanor sexual abuse, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-3006 (2001). He makes three arguments on appeal: (1) that the charging document lacked particularity about the date and time of the alleged offense, and thus did not provide adequate notice to appellant of the charges against him; (2) that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to independently inq

787 F.Supp.2d 1047 (2011) Maria COZZI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF MARIN, et al., Defendants. No. C 08-3633 PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. April 18, 2011. *1051 David M. Poore, Kahn Brown & Poore LLP, Petaluma, CA, Scott A. Brown, Kahn *1052 Brown & Poore LLP,

OPINION OF THE COURT CORRIGAN, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, appellant was found guilty by a military judge sitting as a special court-martial of drunken driving and wrongful use of cocaine in violation of Articles 111 and 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 911 and 912a (Supp. V 1987) [hereinafter UCMJ]. His approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for two mont

McAnany, J.: Guaranty National Insurance Company (Guaranty) appeals from the district court’s entry of judgment in a garnishment proceeding and its award of attorney fees. We affirm. This extensive litigation centers on Guaranty’s issuance of an auto insurance policy to Sandra Simental. The policy provided liability coverage of $25,000. The insured automobile was involved in an accident in Colorado while bein

*1004OPINION OP THE COURT JOHNSON, Senior Judge: Pursuant to mixed pleas, the appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of twelve specifications of disobeying an order of a commissioned officer and six specifications of aggravated assault, in violation of Articles 90 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 1

OPINION OF THE COURT FOREMAN, Senior Judge: A general court-martial convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of one specification of conspiracy and two specifications of robbery, in violation of Articles 81 and 122, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881 and 922 (1982). The court-martial acquitted the appellant of one additional specification of conspiracy and two additional specifications o

CURTIS, District Judge. This case comes before this court on the defendants’ motions to dismiss. Defendant, Douglas Aircraft Corporation, entered into a collective bargaining agreement with the defendant, International Association of Machinists, Local No. 720, as exclusive bargaining agent for the employees at the defendant’s plant at Torrance, California, and has entered into a similar agreement with the

644 So.2d 733 (1994) Margie B. FOUNTAIN v. Donald L. FOUNTAIN. No. CA 93 2176. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. October 7, 1994. *736 Maria O'Byrne Stephenson, Lisa Matthews, New Orleans, for appellant Donald L. Fountain. Ernest Hartenstine, Hammond, for appellee Margie B. Fountain. Before CRAIN, FOIL an

892 S.W.2d 56 (1994) L.T. BRADT and L.T. Bradt, P.C., Appellants, v. W. David WEST, Judy Sebek, Earle Lilly, William J. Delmore III, Piro & Lilly, P.C., Joel Nass, Foundation for Depelchin Children's Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Ernest Kendrick, M.D., Michael D. Cox, Jean Guez, Barbara Taylor Chase Hopkins, Luisa Maria Acevedo Lohner, Ann M. Hodges, Edward J. Hennessy, Hennessy & Zito, Donald B. McFall, McFall & Sartwelle, P.C.

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS