Cases

MEMORANDUM *** *991Eduardo Lopez-Hernandez, his wife Elba Margarita Estrada, and their two daughters, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying the parents’ applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of a motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. See Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008). An alien who is subject to a final order of removal is limited to filing one motion to reopen removal pro

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00098-CR Margarita Quintella Ramirez, Appellant v.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00098-CR Margarita Quintella Ramirez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 340TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C-08-1153-SB, HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BARRY STERNLICHT, DR. LEWIS GOLD, ) ELLIOT COOPERSTONE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0477-PAF ) MARLOW HERNANDEZ, ANGEL ) MORALES, JACQUELINE GUICHELAAR,

OMNIBUS OPINION AND ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs Nydia E. Soto Quinones (“Soto”) and Jose Luis Torres Perez (“Torres”)(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed the instant action against their former employer, the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”), and its employees Juan Alicea Flores, Victor Oppenheimer Soto, Maria Mendez, Jorge Hernandez Perez, and Al

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: Today the majority untethers our retro-activity jurisprudence in the criminal alien context from the mooring the Supreme Court established in INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 121 S.Ct. 2271, 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001). Because Congress has chosen to reduce immigration benefits available to aliens convicted of

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARGARITA HERNANDEZ DE  ANDERSON, No. 05-74132 Petitioner, v.  Agency No. A19-921-652 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent.

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 1, 2025. In The Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-24-00068-CV ANTHONY NORMAN, Appellant V. ASHLEY JANAK, BOBBY LUMPKIN, BRYAN COLLIER, MARGARITA THOMAS, ROCKY MOORE, AND TAMMY SHELBY, Appellees On Appeal from the 12th District Court Walker Count

LYNCH, Chief Judge. These two appeals arise out of similar lawsuits in which plaintiffs, current and previous employees of the Puerto Rico State Insurance Fund Corporation (SIFC), have alleged that defendants, the SIFC and its high-level administrators, selectively enforced Puerto Rico’s merit principle against them. This “selective enforcement” is said to be in violation of the

NUMBER 13-18-00529-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE MCALLEN HOSPITALS, L.P. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ORDER Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides Per Curiam Order Relator McAllen Hospitals,

OPINION AND ORDER "BRUCE J. McGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge Margarita Santiago Ortiz (“Santiago”) and Jan M. Derieux Lebrón (“Dei-ieux”), *243personally and on behalf of their minor daughter, J.D.S. (collectively, “plaintiffs”), sued Caparra Center Associates, LLC (“Caparra”)' and Capitol Security Police, Inc. (“Capitol”) (collectively, “

LYNCH, Chief Judge. When the government of Puerto Rico changed hands following the November 2012 General Elections, the legislature enacted Law 75-2013 (“Law 75”) which repealed Reorganization Plan No. 1-2011 (“2011 Reorganization Plan”) and in doing so purportedly “abolished” four positions that the 2011 Reorganization Plan had created. At the same time, the legislature also enac

En el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico Elizabeth Josephine Sosa Hernandez, Pedro Guanil Igaravidez Recurso Gubernativo Recurrente 98TSPR82 .V Hon. Margarita M. Borras Marín, Registradora de la Propiedad, Sección de Fajardo Recurrida Número del Caso: RG-96-4 Abogados Parte Demandante: Recurrente: Lcdo. Raúl Muñoz González Abogados Parte Demandada: Recurrida: Lcda. Marga

REINSTATEMENT ORDER JOSÉ ANTONIO FUSTÉ, District Judge. This is a case about contract employees of a municipality whose transitory employment contracts were continuously renewed over as many as eleven years. The First Circuit is very familiar with the concept of transitory employees. These are individuals who central and municipal governments hire disregarding the Puerto Rico personnel laws tha

ACCEPTED 01-15-00989-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/3/2015 1:47:58 PM

ACCEPTED 01-15-00350-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/14/201

NUMBER 13-15-00296-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE BENEVIS, LLC, DENTRISTRY OF BROWNSVILLE, P.C., AND KOOL SMILES, P.C. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez, Benavides, and

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1739 JANET VAZQUEZ-VELAZQUEZ; RAMON A. DEL VALLE-LOPEZ; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP DEL VALLE-VAZQUEZ; CARLOS R. CESPEDES-GOMEZ; JOCELYN CALO-BIRRIEL; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP CESPEDES-CALO; SAUL O. ALMEDA-CRUZ; JUDITH NIEVES-RIVERA; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP ALMEDA- NIEVES; FRANCISCO M. ALVARADO-BARRIOS; MARILYN ALVAREZ-RIVERA; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP ALVARADO-ALVAREZ; JUAN C. ARROYO-RAMIREZ; DAMARIS VELEZ-RIOS;

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00334-CR Teran Pennick, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CR-13-200027, HONORABLE BRANDY MUELLER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION