Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Margaret A. Peruzzi”
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge. This is a suit by a employee ERISA welfare plan beneficiary and his dependent against the plan. Plaintiffs Jeffrey J. Christoff and K.C., his dependant, seek reversal of a decision by the Plan Administrator 1 refusing to: 1) provide neuropsychological testing of; and 2) continue treatment for K.C. Pending are cross-motions for summar
Commonwealth v. Ciminopublic domain
A complaint in the Lawrence District Court charged the defendant Ignatius Cimino in seventeen counts with the wilful and malicious destruction or injury of seventeen respective items of property, each having a value exceeding $250. See G. L. c. 266, § 127, as amended through St. 1987, c. 468, § 5, set out in the margin.1 Upon bench trial, Anthony Simone, a Methuen police officer, testified thus. At 5:29 a.
MINER, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Arvinder Singh appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Seullin, C.J.), following a jury trial. Singh was convicted of health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347; conspiracy to distribute and dispense controlled substances, in violation of
Commonwealth v. Bregolipublic domain
Marshall, C.J. The defendant, Robert B. Bregoli, was convicted of murder in the first degree of his former wife on a theory of deliberate premeditation. He filed a motion for a new trial, which the trial judge denied without an evidentiary hearing. The defendant’s appeal from that order has been consolidated with his direct appeal. He challenges (1) the denial of his motion for a required finding of not guilty; (2) certain eviden