Cases

BAREDULL, Senior Judge. Marcus appeals a final judgment entered in favor of Sullivan, arising from Marcus’ action to enforce a promissory note. The judgment reads in part as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The plaintiff in this cause is a lawyer who represented the defendant’s current husband, whom the plaintiff knew was contemplating bank

793 F.Supp. 812 (1992) Esther MARCUS, Michelle W., by her next friend Marie W., Larry Ryne, Consuelo Allen, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. No. 85 C 453. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. May 26, 1992.

ORDER PER CURIAM. Marcus Martin, proceeding pro se, filed a late notice of appeal. In response to a show cause order, he claims that he did not receive timely notice of the underlying judgment. But Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6) requires Martin to seek relief in the district court. He did not. We therefore

*112 LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. This case, which requires us to assess whether an employee’s alcoholism constituted a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), illustrates the difficulties of invoking work as the major life activity substantially limited by an impairment such as alcoholism.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JESSALYN MARCUS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 09-1686 (EGS) JANET YELLEN, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jessalyn Marcus (“Pla

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge Introduction Appellant Marcus Hughes (“Hughes”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury verdict. The jury found Hughes guilty on two counts: forcible rape and second-degree assault. Hughes presents two points on appeal. First, Hughes, argues that the prosecution did not present sufficient evidence that

423 B.R. 881 (2010) In re Marcus K. SULLIVAN, Debtor. Raymond Howard, Plaintiff, v. Marcus K. Sullivan, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-44079-659. Adversary No. 09-4123-659. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. February 22, 2010. *882 Raymond Howard, Saint Louis, MO, pro se. Marcus K. Sullivan,

LEVINE, J. The issue for our consideration is whether the trial court erred in striking appellant’s pleadings as a “sham” and entering a final judgment in favor of a law firm and its principal. The complaint centered on whether appellant deserved credit for $50,000 paid to the firm. The trial court found that appellant’s claim was a sham because only appellant’s company had th

679 N.W.2d 19 (2004) STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Andrew Marcus SULLIVAN, Appellant. No. 02-0542. Supreme Court of Iowa. April 7, 2004. *21 Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Theresa R. Wilson, Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Linda J. Hines, Assistant Attorn

0IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 122,400 ELYSIA A. MARCUS, Appellee, v. ERIC SWANSON, M.D., Appellant, v. ELYSIA A. MARCUS,

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: The Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections (“Secretary”) appeals the district court’s grant of federal habeas corpus relief to petitioner Kevin Sullivan based on Sullivan’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney advised him to turn down the State’s plea offer and proceed to trial

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-00773-SCT MARCUS L. ROBINSON a/k/a MARCUS LEVON ROBINSON a/k/a MARCUS ROBINSON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/02/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. SMITH MURPHEY TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: MARVELL MAURICE GORDON STEVEN PATRICK JUBERA JALEESA RENE’ SEALS

312 F.3d 90 T.F.T.F. CAPITAL CORP., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant,v.MARCUS DAIRY, INC., Michael Marcus, as Officer, Director and Shareholder of Marcus Dairy, individually, and Agnes Barbiero, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees,James E. Sullivan, Fairfield County Deputy Sheriff, individually, and Dominick Barbiero, Defendants-Counter-Claimants. Docket No. 01-7549. United Stat

[Cite as State v. Sullivan, 2025-Ohio-643.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113834 v. : KHAYREE SULLIVAN,

In re Lufkin Industries, Inc.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of St. John Baptist, 40th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 23,908; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 96-CA-0274, 96-CA-0220. Denied. MARCUS, VICTORY and TRAYLOR, JJ., would grant the writ. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

[Cite as State v. Sullivan, 2023-Ohio-1612.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 1-22-37 v. MARCUS J. SULLIVAN, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Allen County Common Pleas Court

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1780 MARCUS CONNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DENNIS REAGLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

993 F.Supp. 565 (1998) Dee I. CHANCE, et al. v. Kent C. SULLIVAN, et al. No. CIV.A. G-97-282. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. February 5, 1998. John F. Nichols, Houston, TX, W. Mark Lanier, Lanier Parker and Sullivan, Houston, TX, for Dee I. Chance. Michael Louis Minns, Houston, TX, Ken N. Bigham, Jr., Schulenburg, TX, for J. Cha

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Marcus L. Sullivan, was indicted on two counts of attempted murder, three counts of felonious assault, one count of improperly discharging a firearm at or into a habitation or in a school safety zone and one count of having a weapon while under disability. All the counts, except having a weapon while under disability, carried firearm specifications. After a jury trial, appellant was foun