Cases

Case: 18-14048 Date Filed: 07/29/2020 Page: 1 of 18 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-14048 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cv-23429-MGC MICHAEL LAVIGNE, JENNIFER LAVIGNE, CODY PY

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 16‐1023 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. MARCUS SHEROD HARRIS, Defendant‐Appellant,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 16‐1023 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. MARCUS SHEROD HARRIS, Defendant‐Appellant.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-2273 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. M ARCUS A. B ROWN, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 1:06-CR-324-15—Samuel

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-1267 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. M ARCUS D. C ANADY, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 07 CR 61—Barbara B. Crabb, Chief Judge.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 03-4239 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus Lee, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RAI CARE CENTERS OF MARYLAND I, LLC Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-3151 (TJK) U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGE- MENT Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff provided outpatient renal dialysis services to nine beneficiaries of a federal-gov- ernment-spons

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 24-2415, 24-2450 & 24-2506 ______________ ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY RIFLE AND PISTOL CLUBS, INC.; BLAKE ELLMAN; MARC WEINBERG v. ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY; SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE; OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE CHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE PARK RIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT

The principal question presented is whether, as the trial court decreed, a mother who procured a divorce in a foreign state with an award of custody of her small child, but without an allowance for its support, may require the father, domiciled in Iowa over whom the divorce court acquired no personal jurisdiction, to contribute to the child's support. Plaintiff obtained the divorce in Seattle, Washington, where she and the child were domiciled. (We refer to the mother as plaintiff alth

Garfield, J. — The principal question presented is whether, as the trial court decreed, a mother who procured a divorce in a foreign state with an award of custody of her small child, but without an allowance for its support, may require the father, domiciled in Iowa over whom the divorce court acquired no personal jurisdiction, to contribute to the child’s support. Plaintiff obtained the divorce in Seattle, Wa

Margett, J. (dissenting). The sole issue is whether it was proper exercise of the defendant town’s zoning powers to restrict the occupancy of industrial buildings in the town’s 1-1 light industrial district to not more than three permitted uses, by not more than three occupants, and further providing that no use shall occupy less than 20,000 square feet of building area. It should be noted at the outset that def

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2348 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL A. ALLGIRE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2348 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL A. ALLGIRE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

COX, J. 11 Appellant and Appellee are the parents of Adalyn Freeman. Shortly after the birth of their daughter in 2012, a considered decree was entered in Natchitoches Parish. No domiciliary status was awarded at the time. Appellee later relocated to Richland Parish and sought modification of the custody agreement and requested to be named the domiciliary parent. The Appel-lee’s request was granted after a h

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA24-1096 Filed 1 October 2025 Guilford County, Nos. 21CR028348-400, 21CR067344-400, 21CR067345-400 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MARCUS ALLEN MCCLINTON, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 30 April 2024 by Judge Robert A. Broadie in Guilford County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 10 September 2025. Attorn

**************************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of this opinion is the date the opinion was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. This opinion is subject to revisions and editorial changes, not of a substantive nature, and corrections of a tech

594 F.Supp.2d 564 (2009) Marie ELLIS v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. Civil Action No. 08-1606. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 22, 2009. *565 Diane Fenner, Gregory J. Boles, Fenner & Boles, LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Marie Ellis. Brian P. Downey, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Harrisburg, PA,

Case: 23-2312 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 04/30/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FINTIV, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2023-2312 ______________________ Appeal from the Un

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00590-COA ROBERT MIDDLEBROOK APPELLANT v. MEGAN FULLER AND MELANIE DUNN APPELLEES DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/21/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. D. NEIL HARRIS SR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR AP

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr