Cases

Sack, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents two state-law questions that neither this Court nor New York's courts have addressed: (1) whether New York law recognizes "cross-jurisdictional class action tolling," i.e., tolling of a New York statute of limitations by the pendency of a class action in another jurisdiction; and (2) whether a non-merits dismissal of class certification can term

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J.), rendered on November 18, 1987, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the first degree and sentencing defendant to a prison term of from 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed. *214We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the c

OPINION AND ORDER DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. On October 31, 2001 this Court dismissed Plaintiffs complaint and entered Judgment, awarding also costs and attorney’s fees in favor of Defendants. (Docket Nos. 58 & 59). On November 30, 2001 Defendants filed a motion requesting that the Court impose upon counsel for Plaintiffs the responsibility of paying the attorneys’ fees, pursuant to Fed.R.C

Opinion by Judge D.W. NELSON; Dissent by Judge BEEZER. D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs, seasonal agricultural workers, appeal the district court’s dismissal of their complaint, which alleges violations of the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq. (“AWPA” or “the Act”). The district court borrowed Arizona’s one-year statute of limitations for l

43 F.3d 1251 129 Lab.Cas. P 33,188 Ubaldo BARAJAS, Tito Peneda Davila, Alberto Media, and RamonMurillo, individually and on behalf of otherssimilarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Elias BERMUDEZ and Dora Bermudez; Natalia Medina; JesusJose Bermudez, Marcos J. Flores, husband,Enriqueta Bermudez Flores, wife andAlbert S. Medina; Centro deProgreso,Defendants-Appellees.

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XII Certiorari procedente del AIDA E. BERMÚDEZ Tribunal de RAMOS Y OTROS Primera Instancia, Sala Superi

18-1120-cv Tobias Bermudez Chavez, et al. v. Occidental Chemical Corp. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2018 (Argued: March 4, 2019 Decided: August 6, 2021) Docket No. 18-1120-cv TOBIAS BERMUDEZ CHAVEZ, GERARDO ANTONIO FONESCA TORRES, FRANKLIN GUILLEN SALAZAR, GARCIA MONTES JOSE GABINO, MARIANO DE LOS ANGELES PIZARRO, ANTONIO OSORN

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX EVA BERMUDEZ CIVIL NO. SX-2020-CV-00738 Plaintiff, Vv ACTION FOR DAMAGES WORLD FRESH MARKET, LLC d/b/a PUEBLO SUPERMARKET. Cite as 2024-VI SUPER 50

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL III SEVERINO BERMÚDEZ Revisión Judicial VARELA Procedente de la Junta de Retiro del Gobierno Recurrido de Puerto Rico KLRA20240

332 F.Supp.2d 407 (2004) Zuleima LEON et al., Plaintiffs, v. Angel M. SANCHEZ-BERMUDEZ et al., Defendants. Civil No. 01-1281(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 31, 2004. *408 *409 Francisco R. Gonzalez-Colon, F.R. Gonzalez Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs.

Ortiz Carrión, Juez Ponente *430TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA I El señor Erick Bermúdez Carrásquillo apela de una sentencia en la que el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Caguas, le desestimó una demanda incoada contra el Estado Libre Asociado por tratarse de una reclamación de daños causados por actos intencionales de

CC-97-762 1 En el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico Carmen S. Hernández Sánchez y otros Recurridos Certiorari v. 99 TSPR 156 Bermúdez & Longo, SE y otros Peticionarios Número del Caso: CC-1997-0762 Abogados de la Parte Peticionaria: Lcdo. Marcos Valls Sánchez

737 F.Supp. 727 (1990) Ana Alicia NIEVES-RAMOS, for herself and as mother with patria potestas of minor Jackson J. Bermudez-Nieves, Plaintiffs, v. Crisanta GONZALEZ-DE-RODRIGUEZ, Romualdo Rodriguez-Arroyo, Defendants. Civ. No. 89-1027CC. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 22, 1990. Eugenio Ramos-Ortiz, Luquillo, P.R., for plaintiffs. Marcos A.

MYRON L. GORDON, Senior District Judge. The appellants are fifteen defendants who have been convicted of various narcotics offenses. They raise a number of challenges to their convictions and sentences. Because we find no merit in the challenges to the convictions of the appellants, the convictions will be affirmed. However, we conclude that appellants James Velasquez and Julio Rodriguez are entitled to resen-tencing.

Opinion RICCIARDULLI, J, I. INTRODUCTION Appellants and plaintiffs Marco A. Munoz and Alejandra Orozco appeal the judgment in favor of respondent and defendant Express Auto Sales doing business as Express Credit, Inc., following a court trial based on defendant’s violation of the Automobile Sales Finance Act (ASEA) (Civ. Code, § 2981 et seq.). Plaintiffs contend that the jud

984 F.2d 1426 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Antonio MOJICA, Giovanni Saldarriaga, Horacio Velasquez,Jose Castaneda, James Velasquez, Rolando Candelo, JaimeConcha, Henry Cordoba, Elmer Velasquez, Hernan NestorBermudez, Gloria Concha, Julio Rodriguez, Marco Granada,Hector Granada, Julio Velasco, and Diego Argaez,Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 89-3809, 90-1140, 90-1178, 90-1277, 90-12

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

2021 IL 126139 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 126139) SAMUEL VALERIO et al., Appellees, v. MOORE LANDSCAPES, LLC, Appellant. Opinion filed May 20, 2021. JUSTICE OVERSTREET delivered the ju

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30309 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:98-cr-00572- MO-8 JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ, AKA Efigenio Aispuro-Aispuro, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30310

Filed 1/14/14 TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS This opinion has been certified for publication in the Official Reports. It is being sent to assist the Court of Appeal in deciding whether to order the case transferred to the court on the court‟s own motion under California Rules of Court, rules 8.1000-8.1018. CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT