Cases

*512OPINION WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. Plaintiffs Antoine Ellis and Daniel Speakman have brought this putative state-law class action asserting federal court jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d), on behalf of themselves and all others whose arrest records and personal information were made widely available on the I

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: The main issue presented by this appeal is whether the government may prove sex trafficking of a minor, 18 U.S.C. § 1591 , by establishing only that a defendant had a reasonable opportunity to observe the minor victim instead o

57 F.Supp.2d 626 (1999) Riccardo MORA, Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE, Defendant. No. 98 C 5270. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 3, 1999. *627 *628 Robert R. Cohen, Frankel & Cohen, Chicago, IL, for Riccardo Mora, plaintiff. John W. Powers, Sheld

USCA11 Case: 23-13577 Document: 43-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2025 Page: 1 of 33 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13577 ____________________ TIM RANDOLPH DANIELS,

222 P.3d 272 (2009) David KAUFMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. William LANGHOFER, D.V.M.; and Scottsdale Veterinary Clinic, Defendants/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 08-0655. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. December 22, 2009. *273 Law Office of Blake D. Gunn By Blake D. Gunn, Mesa, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant.

OPINION CHÁVEZ, Justice. {1} “All persons are born equally free, and have certain natural, inherent and inalienable rights, among which are the rights of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and of seeking and obtaining safety and happiness.” N.M. Const, art

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 16:00:53 2014.01.23 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2014

977 A.2d 779 (2008) 51 Conn.Sup. 155 Carolyn WITT et al. v. YALE-NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL. No. CV-06-5005021-S. Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of New Haven. September 30, 2008. *781 Jacobs & Jacobs, P.C., New Haven, for the plaintiffs. Wiggin & Dana, LLP, New Haven, for the defen

Lavine, Beach and Bear, Js. LAVINE, BEACH and BEAR, Js. *73 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. FACTS...548 A. Factual and Procedural History...548 B. Issues on Appeal...553

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

516 N.W.2d 313 (1994) NATIONAL FARMERS UNION PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY, a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Sookie S. BANG and American Concept Insurance Company, a South Dakota insurance company, Defendants and Appellants, and Michael L. Bergstresser, John M. Ligtenberg, U.S. West Communications, a Colorado corporation, and Horace Mann Service Corp., an Illinois corporation, Defendants and Appellees, and Brenda J. Ca

154 F.Supp.2d 1240 (2001) Anthony ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. Simon L. LEIS, Jr., et al., Defendants. No. C-1-00-261. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. June 19, 2001. *1241 *1242 *1243 *1244 Stephen R.

785 F.Supp.2d 1188 (2011) Richard OBENAUF, Plaintiff, v. FRONTIER FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Defendants. No. Civ. 11-0085 JB/KBM. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. May 19, 2011. *1190 Rob Treinen, Treinen Law Office, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff. *1191 AMENDED MEMO

POLOZOLA, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the motion of the defendants, Ligón Specialized Haulers, Bud M. Edwards, and Protective Insurance Company, for summary judgment. No oral argument is required on this motion. This action was filed in the 18th Judicial District for the Parish of West Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana by the plaintiff, Gloria Dwyer, as administratrix of the successio

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: [Regarding New GM’s Partial Motion To Dismiss the Fourth Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint] INTRODUCTION .. .391 BACKGROUND .. .392 LEGAL STANDARDS .. .394 DISCUSSION .. .395 A. Brand Devaluation Claims... .395 B. Damages for L

Motion, treated as a motion for clarification of this Court’s memorandum and for amendment of this Court’s remittitur, granted. This Court’s November 18, 1992 memorandum is amended by deleting the first paragraph thereof and substituting in its stead the following: "The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the order of Supreme Court, insofar as it granted appellant Christa Construction, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration,

129 B.R. 710 (1991) In re JOINT EASTERN AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION. United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York. In re JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Bernadine K. FINDLEY, as Executrix of the Estate of Hilliard Findley, Uma Lail Caldwell, as Executrix of the Estate of Odell Caldwell, Edward Lindley, Joseph C. Jones and James William Barnette, Jr., on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly