Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Maniscalco v. New York City Department of Education”
Pesce v. New York City Police Departmentpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge: This dispute arises out of the determination by the New York Police Department (“NYPD”) that plaintiff Jonathan Pesce (“Pesce”) is medically disqualified from serving as a police officer on account of having a seizure condition and taking anti-convulsant medication. Pesce has sued the NYPD, the City of New York, NYPD surgeon Dr. Eli Kleinman, and for
Rodriguez v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 32 Carlos Rodriguez, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent. Joshua D. Kelner, for appellant. Richard Dearing, for respondent. Defense Association of New Yo
Rodriguez v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kathryn E. Freed, J.), entered October 22, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered November 12, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant’s motion to strike the claim for lost earnings or,
Kane v. De Blasio Keil v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
21-2678-cv; 21-2711-cv Kane v. de Blasio; Keil v. City of New York UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2021 (Argued: November 22, 2021 Decided: November 28, 2021) No. 21-2678 –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– MICHAEL KANE, WILLIAM CASTRO,
Fanelli v. New Yorkpublic domain
*366MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Denis R. Hurley, United States District Judge Gina M. Fanelli (“Fanelli” or “plaintiff’) commenced this action against defendants the State of New York, James Gilmore (“Gilmore”), Peter A. Scully (“Scully”) (collectively, “defendants”) asserting claims of gender-based discrimination and retaliatory employment practices in v
Fanelli v. New Yorkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On November 27, 2013, the Plaintiff Gina M. Fanelli (the “Plaintiff’) commenced this action against the Defendants the State of New York (the “State”); James Gilmore (“Gilmore”); Peter A. Scully (“Scully”); and John and Jane Doe, said names fictitious, the persons intended being those who aided and abetted the alleged unlawful conduct of the named De
Matter of Clarke v. Board of Educ. of the City Sch.public domain
Matter of Clarke v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. (2023 NY Slip Op 00945) Matter of Clarke v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. 2023 NY Slip Op 00945 Decided on February 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York Stat
Matter of Clarke v. Board of Educ. of the City Sch.public domain
Matter of Clarke v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. (2023 NY Slip Op 00945) Matter of Clarke v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. 2023 NY Slip Op 00945 Decided on February 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York Stat
City of Schenectady v. Edison Exploratorium, Inc.public domain
Rose, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (R. Sise, J.), entered April 14, 2016 in Schenectady County, which, among other things, partially granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. On September 30, 2005, plaintiff entered into a contract to convey adjoining buildings located at 132 and 136 Broadway in the City of Schenectady, Schene
City of Houston v. Williamspublic domain
183 S.W.3d 409 (2005) The CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant, v. Steve WILLIAMS, et al., Appellees. No. 14-04-01108-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston. August 23, 2005. Rehearing Overruled January 19, 2006. *412 Timothy J. Higley, Houston, for appellant. E. Troy Blakeney, Richard Charles M
the City of Houston v. Steve Williamspublic domain
Affirmed and Opinion filed August 23, 2005 Affirmed and Opinion filed August 23, 2005 In The
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1525-21 A-1548-21 NEW JERSEY STATE POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION,1 APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Appellant, February 11, 2022
Giarrusso v. City of Albanypublic domain
—Mercure, J. Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court (Prior Jr., J.), entered May 16, 1989 in Albany County, which denied plaintiff John Giarrusso’s motion for counsel fees. In October 1980 plaintiffs, John Giarrusso (hereinafter plaintiff) and his brother, Carl Giarrusso, commenced suit against defendants, the City of Albany, its police department and Officer Richard P. Maniscalco, for false arrest
Village of Waterford v. Amna Enterprises, Inc.public domain
Carpinello, J. Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court (Nolan, Jr., J.), entered September 7, 2005 in Saratoga County, which partially granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment permanently enjoining defendant from continuing its filling station operation. *1045At issue on this appeal is a parcel of real property located in a reside
Professional Staff Congress/Cuny v. City Universitypublic domain
507 F.Supp. 637 (1981) PROFESSIONAL STAFF CONGRESS/CUNY, Luis Rodriguez-Abad, Irwin Blatt, Rosalind Barnes, Robert Slotnick and Samuel Margulies, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK and Harold M. Jacobs, Paul P. Baard, Herman Badillo, Blanche Bernstein, Ann M. Burton, James A. Cavanagh, Loretta A. Conway, Walter H. Crowley, Armand D'Angelo, Edith B. Everett, Gurston D. Goldin, Judah Gribetz, Albert V. Maniscalco, Joan B. Maynard, James
Fox v. District of Columbiapublic domain
990 F.Supp. 13 (1997) F.D.R. FOX, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 91-0671-LFO. United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 25, 1997. *14 *15 John H. Jamnback, Boraks & Jamnback, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. David Cleveland,
County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.public domain
PIERCE, Senior Circuit Judge: These appeals and cross-appeals represent another in a series of disputes involving the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (“Shoreham”).1 Numerous issues are presented for review. Although relying on different reasons, we affirm the district court’s grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of the Long Island Lighting Company (“LILCO”) fol
County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.public domain
710 F.Supp. 1428 (1989) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, a municipal corporation, Robert Alcorn, Christopher S. George, Fred Harrison, Peter Maniscalco, William P. Quinn, and Custom Extruders, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY, Stone & Webster Engineering Company, Charles R. Pierce, Wilfred O. Uhl, Charles J. Davis, and Andrew W. Wofford, Defendants. UNITED STATES of America ex rel. W. Gordon DICK and John P. Daly, Jr., Plaintiffs,
County Of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Companypublic domain
907 F.2d 1295 59 USLW 2036, 113 P.U.R.4th 477, RICOBus.Disp.Guide 7511 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, a Municipal Corporation, Robert Alcorn,Christopher S. George, Fred Harrison, Peter Maniscalco,William P. Quinn, Robert Hoffman, Susan Chase, YolandaOwens, James Roth, Myra Berzoff and Sandra Rosenberg, onbehalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,County of Suffolk, a Municipal Corpora
Messer v. Collins (In re Collins)public domain
DECISION CARLA CRAIG, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge This adversary proceeding was commenced by Gregory Messer, Esq., trustee for the estate of Nigel Collins (the “Trustee”), against Raquel Collins (“Collins”) and School Data Corp. (“School Data” and collectively with Collins, “Defendants”). The Trustee seeks a judgment against Defendants on the basis of an alleged fraudulent