Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1464 ___________________________ Mario Ferbo Mancini lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. United States of America, FTCA Claim

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

CCA 38783. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 23, 2017.

CCA 38783. On consideration of Appellee’s motion to dismiss the petition for grant of review for lack of jurisdiction, *173it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted without prejudice to Appellant’s right to file a petition during the course of normal appellate review.

624 F.3d 879 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angelo MANCINI, III, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-1178. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 19, 2010. Filed: November 12, 2010. *880 Katherine M. Menendez, AFPD, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant. David P. Stein

SUMMARY ORDER John Mancini appeals from a judgment dated October 24, 2006, convicting him, pursuant to a guilty plea, of one count of participation in a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute hydrocodone in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and two counts of distribution and possession with intent to distribute hydrocodone in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 812, 829(b), and 841(a)(1)(D) and 21 C.F.R. §§ 1306.21 and 1308.13. The District

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

390 B.R. 796 (2008) Todd M. MANCINI dba Mancini Electric, Debtor. GMAC, Objectant v. Todd M. Mancini dba Mancini Electric, Respondent. No. 1-07-bk-02236 RNO. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. July 15, 2008. *798 Dorothy L. Mott, Marc Allan Crum, Law Office of Dorothy L. Mott, Harrisburg, PA, for Debtor. <

MEMORANDUM** Gerald Mancini appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence for narcotics violations. Mancini contends that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), renders his sentence unconstitutional. We recently held that the rule announced in Apprendi does not apply retroa

Supreme Court No. 2014-88 (13-92 S) Mark Mancini : v. : City of Providence et al. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Opinion Analyst, Supreme

OPINION Justice Robinson, for the Court. This case comes before us pursuant to a September 26, 2013 order of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island certifying a question to this Court in accordance with Article I, Rule 6(a) of the Supreme Court Rules of Appel

STAHL, Circuit Judge. In this criminal appeal, we must decide whether the Mayor of North Providence, Rhode Island, defendant Salvatore Mancini (“Mancini”), has standing 1 to challenge a search of the town’s archive attic and subsequent seizure of the Mayor’s 1987 appointment calendar. The district court ruled in Mancini

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 93-1417 UNITED STATES,

BYERS, Chief Judge. This is a hearing on exceptive allegations to a libel filed January 29, 1958. The cause pleaded is the frequent one of personal injury resulting in death by the libelant’s decedent, while in the employ of American Stevedores, Inc. on July 23, 1957, on which date the decedent was functioning as a longshoreman on the SS Marine Fiddler, then lying at a pier at the Brooklyn Army Base.

INCH, Chief Judge. Libelant brings this action against the Government under the Public Vessels Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 781 et seq., and the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 741 et seq., for personal injuries sustained by him on February 14, 1949 while working as a longshoreman aboard the U. S. Army Transport Corporal Eric G. Gibson at the Brooklyn Army Base. The Government has impleaded libelant’s employer Pittston Stevedorin

791 F.2d 922 U.S.v.Mancini 85-5526 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. 4/21/86 1 D.N.J. AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMANDED

786 F.2d 1149 U.S.v.Mancini 85-1558 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. 2/28/86 1 E.D.Pa. AFFIRMED

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: Following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, appellant Pierluigi Mancini pled guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Mancini conditioned his plea by preserving the right to appeal from the denial of the motion to suppress. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

396 F.Supp. 75 (1975) UNITED STATES of America v. Robert Joseph MANCINI a/k/a Robert Joseph Mengini. No. 74-669. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. June 30, 1975. *76 Joseph M. Fioravanti, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. Edward Reif, McAllister & Reif, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendan

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Mark Mancini is a veteran police officer in Providence, Rhode Island (the City). Following an injury that he sustained while on duty, Mancini sued the City for discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §