⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Mamie Louise Carter”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994-03-29 · Published · cited 45× · 17 F.3d 356
17 F.3d 356 64 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 516,64 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,968Peners L. GRIFFIN, Henry L. Dejerinett, Plaintiffs,Alvin Smith, Intervenor-Appellant,v.Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., State of Florida Department ofCorrections, State of Florida, Defendants-Appellees,Louie L. Wainwright, Raymond W. Geary, Defendants,Samuel Platt, David Baber, Romeo Cozart, Marvin Jones,Michael Oyefesobi, Movants-Appellants.Pe
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002-03-08 · Published · cited 3× · 191 F. Supp. 2d 1292; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4547; 2002 WL 416891
191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994-03-29 · Published · cited 70× · 17 F.3d 356; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5933; 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,968; 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 516
CARNES, Circuit Judge: This case presents the question whether the pendency of a Title VII class action tolls the administrative charge-filing period for the class members when class certification is vacated because the representative failed to make a timely filing with the EEOC. We hold that it does toll the period for those wishing to bring individual suits but does not for those wishing to bring class action suits.
Marilyn v. Statepublic domain
Court of Claims of Illinois · 1983-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 306; 1983 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 45
Roe, C.J. This cause coming on to be heard on the joint stipulation of the parties hereto, the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds; That the multiple-party group of Claimants listed herein consists of 540 Claimants seeking individual judgments of varying amounts. These claims, in the aggregate amount of five hundred ninety thousand six hundred thirty-four do
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Hickey v. ANDERSONpublic domain
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1951-01-08 · Published · cited 18× · 49 So. 2d 713; 210 Miss. 455; 1951 Miss. LEXIS 282
210 Miss. 455 (1951) 49 So.2d 713 HICKEY v. ANDERSON, et al. No. 37761. Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division B. January 8, 1951. H.T. Carter and Guyton & Allen, for appellant. Robin Weaver and John T. Frierson, for appellee. Ethridge, C. Appellant undertakes to set aside a deed executed by an elderly lady to the thr
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
In re Rudypublic domain
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1939-01-05 · Published · cited 0× · 25 F. Supp. 912; 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3194
SWINFORD, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on a Petition for Review of an order of the Referee in Bankruptcy, disallowing the claim of Agee Department Stores in the sum of $24,700. Prior to March 7, 1929, the department store of J. A. Rudy & Sons of Paducah, Kentucky, was owned in partnership by W. H. Rudy, Kate S. Rudy and Louise C. Rudy. The first two partners named owned a two fifths
People v. Utterpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1972-03-29 · Published · cited 9× · 24 Cal. App. 3d 535; 101 Cal. Rptr. 214; 1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 1153
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 537 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 538 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAY
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956-12-10 · Published · cited 7× · 92 So. 2d 377; 231 La. 594; 1956 La. LEXIS 1558
92 So.2d 377 (1956) 231 La. 594 ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY v. Abe JORDAN, Jr., et al. No. 42717. Supreme Court of Louisiana. December 10, 1956. Rehearing Denied January 21, 1957. *378 Vanue B. Lacour, Baton Rouge, Louis Berry, New Orleans, for appellants. Young & Watson, St. Jose
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973-10-29 · Published · cited 117× · 284 So. 2d 905
284 So.2d 905 (1973) Victor A. LOMBARD v. SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS et al. and consolidated cases. No. 53006. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 29, 1973. Rehearings Denied November 30, 1973. *906 Harry P. Gamble, Jr., Harry P. Gamble, III, Cameron C. Gamble, Gamble & Gamble, New Orleans, for p