Cases

OPINION WARDLAW, Circuit Judge. We must decide whether the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) erred in dismissing an appeal when the petitioner dutifully followed all regulations and procedures pertaining to filing his Notice of Appeal, but the BIA itself deprived him of the opportunity to timely file his brief by sending the briefing schedule and tran

ORDER The Opinion filed on August 15, 2003, slip op. at 11509, and published at 340 F.3d 802 (9th Cir.2003), is hereby amended. The Clerk shall file the attached Amended Opinion. With this Amended Opinion, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge. The intriguing issue in this case is when does “transportation” begin in a prosecution under the Federal Kidnapping Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a). Shortly, we will get into the facts which began in New Jersey, moved to tiny Francis Creek in Wisconsin, and wound up back in New Jersey. The events we will relate earned Malkit “Mike” Singh and Ekabal “Paul” Busara an indictment charging them with the kidnapping

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 05-4509 & 05-4575 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MALKIT “MIKE” SINGH and EKABAL “PAUL” BUSARA, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. Malkit Singh, a native and citizen of India, entered the United States in December 1997 as a visitor for pleasure with authorization to remain for six months. He overstayed his admission period and, in February 1999, was charged as being removable pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 237(a)(1)(B) [8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(B) ]. Alter unsuccessfully applying f

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. Malkit Singh, a native and citizen of India, entered the United States in December 1997 as a visitor for pleasure with authorization to remain for six months. He overstayed his admission period and, in February 1999, was charged as being removable pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 237(a)(1)(B) [8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(B) ]. Alter unsuccessfully applying f

[Cite as Two Brothers Market, L.L.C. v. Singh, 2025-Ohio-1803.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO TWO BROTHERS MARKET, LLC, : APPEAL NO. C-240415 TRIAL NO. A-2300016 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. :

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Leggiere v. Merrill Lynch Realty/Florida, Inc., 544 So.2d 240 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Senior Judge, concur.

Miller v Singh 2026 NY Slip Op 03158 May 20, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. Quashon Miller, respondent, v Malkit Singh, et al., appellants. Supreme Court of the State of New York, Ap

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge. This is a Chapter 11 case and the matter under consideration is the extent and priority of several mortgages which admittedly encumbered the one and only asset of Sunny Beach Motel, Inc. (Debtor), a property which had already been sold by the Trustee. The matter is presented for this Court’s consideration by Raymond B. Ray, the Truste

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts J, K, and L, and the first five sentences of the Disposition. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1345 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAI

Filed 5/13/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ZIEVE, BRODNAX & STEELE, LLP, F079665 Plaintiff, (Super. Ct. No. CV-18-004711) v. ASHRAJ SINGH DHINDSA, OPINION Defenda

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ABDIKADIR HASSAN, ADEN YUSUF, AMAN ADAM, AMINA No. 80542-8-I AHMED, ANAB ALI, ASHA ALI, ASHWANI BHARDWAJ, BINH LE, DIVISION ONE CHINDERPAL SINGH, FADUMO MOHAMED, FARDOUS ORDER GRANTING MOTION HUSSEIN, FARHIA ADAM, FELIX TO PUBLISH OPINION, AND GARCIA, GURMAIL SINGH, HAI WITHDRAWING AND PHAM, HAMZA ADEN, HANI SUBSTITUTING OPINION OSMAN, HARINDER NAHAL, JASWINDER GREWAL, JASMINDER SINGH GILL, JOGGIT SINGH

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ABDIKADIR HASSAN, ADEN YUSUF, AMAN ADAM, AMINA No. 80542-8-I AHMED, ANAB ALI, ASHA ALI, ASHWANI BHARDWAJ, BINH LE, DIVISION ONE CHINDERPAL SINGH, FADUMO MOHAMED, FARDOUS PUBLISHED IN PART HUSSEIN, FARHIA ADAM, FELIX GARCIA, GURMAIL SINGH, HAI PHAM, HAMZA ADEN, HANI OSMAN, HARINDER NAHAL, JASWINDER GREWAL, JASMINDER SINGH GILL, JOGGIT SINGH BHULLAR, MACARIO ESPINOZA, MALKIT SINGH, MURAYO GULED, RESHAM SINGH GILL, SALADO

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Mohammed Mozammel Hos-sain is a native and citizen of Bangladesh who attempted to enter the United States through Newark airport on October 9, 1991. Exclusion proceedings were brought against him on that date, and he in turn sought asylum and withholding of deportation. After a long series of hearings, both forms of relief were denied by an Immigra

551 F.3d 669 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ekabal Paul BUSARA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3857. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 28, 2008. Decided December 30, 2008. *670 Michelle L. Jacobs (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED, AS MODIFIED. Defendants appeal from an amended judgment of the District Court dated April 22, 2002, granting injunctive relief to plaintiff, as well as $119,853.58 in back wages, $119,853.50 in liquidated damages, and costs. I. Background

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 07-3857 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E KABAL P AUL B USARA, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. No. 03 CR 52—William C. Griesbach, Judge

196 F.Supp.2d 281 (2002) Elaine L. CHAO, Secretary of Labor United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff, v. VIDTAPE, INC., Inventive Technology Systems, Inc., Mohinder Singh Anand, Satinder Singh Anand, and Arjan Singh Anand, Defendants. No. CV 98-3359(ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 22, 2002. *282