Cases

Id. , Ex. C ("2017 TOS"), ECF 25-2. Section 13(G) in turn states: G. Future changes to Dispute Resolution Agreement. If Google makes any changes to this Dispute Resolution Agreement (other than a change to Google's Notice Address), Customer or Advertiser may reject any such change by notifying Goog

MEMORANDUM: OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On December 19, 2012, four named plaintiffs (“plaintiffs”) filed a consolidated amended complaint (“CAC”) in this multidistrict consolidated litigation against Google Inc. (“Google”), Vibrant Media, Inc. (“Vibrant”), Media Innovation Group LLC (“Media”), and WPP, pic (“WPP”), (collectively “defendants”), as well as PointRoll, Inc.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GOPHER MEDIA LLC, a Nevada No. 24-2626 Limited Liability Corporation D.C. No. formerly known as Local Clicks 3:21-cv-01909- doing business as Doctor Multimedia; RBM-VET AJAY THAKORE, an individual, Plaintiffs - Appellants, OPINION v

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On March 25, 2015, plaintiff Improved Search LLC (“plaintiff’) filed a complaint alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,604,101 (“the ’101 patent”) and 7,516,154 (“the ’154 patent”) against defendant AOL Inc. (“defendant”). (D.1.1) Presently before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss. (D.1.9) The court has jurisdict

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On May 27, 2015, plaintiff Treehouse Avatar LLC (“plaintiff’) filed a complaint alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,180,858 (“the ’858 patent”) against defendant Valve Corporation (“defendant”). (D.I.l) Presently before the court are defendant’s motions to dismiss (D.I.ll) and transfer (D.I.17). The court has jurisdicti

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On August 31, 2015, plaintiff Device Enhancement LLC (“plaintiff’) filed a complaint alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,747,683 (“the ’683 patent”) against defendant Amazon.com Inc. (“defendant”). (D.I. 1) Presently before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss. (D.I. 11) The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Belmora LLC’s (“Belmora”) Motion to Dismiss Bayer Consumer Care AG and Bayer Healthcare’s Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss Complaint”) (Doc. 36), Belmora’s *495Motion to Dismiss Bayer CC AG’s Counterclaim (“Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim”) (Doc

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge 1. INTRODUCTION On July 9, 2014, plaintiff Network Congestion Solutions, LLC (“plaintiff”) filed a complaint alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,826,620 (“the ’620 patent”) against defendant United States Cellular Corporation (“US Cellular”) (D.1.1)1 and defendant WideOpenWest Finance, LLC (“WOW”) (collecti

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On July 24, 2013, plaintiffs Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (collectively, “plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against defendant Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (“defendant”) alleging direct and indirect infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,664,701 (“the ’701 patent”), 8,083,137 (“the T37 pat

Chapter 11 MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINT SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND.. .330 I. The Debtors and the Commencement of the Bankruptcy Cases... 330 II. The LightSquared LP Credit Agreement. . .330 III. The Defendants...

Howard v. IOMAXIS, LLC, 2026 NCBC 63. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG 18CVS011679-590 KELLY C. HOWARD and FIFTH THIRD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE RONALD E. HOWARD REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED FEBRUARY 9, 2016, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED, Plaintiffs,

In the United States Court of Federal Claims FACTOR2 MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff, No. 24-cv-0475 (Filed: June 25, 2026) v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Joseph J. Zito, DNL Zito, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff. Jhaniel James, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Defendant.

ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AMETEK, INC’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. # 7) AND DENYING DEFENDANT AMETEK, INC’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (Doc. # 10) THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant Ametek, Inc.’s (hereinafter “Defendant” or “Ametek”) Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 7.) and Defendant’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions (Doc. 10.). In the Motion to Dismiss, Defendant as

MEMORANDUM JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association bring this putative class action on behalf of themselves and all oth*484er similarly situated persons who purchased securities in Bankrate, Inc. (“Bank-rate”) between June 16, 2011 and October 15, 2012 (the “Cl

CARL J. BARBIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *391Before the Court are Defendant, Sheriff Randy Smith's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Rec. Doc. 8) , an opposition thereto filed by Plaintiffs (Rec. Doc. 16) and Sheriff Smith's reply. (Rec. Doc. 54). Having considered the Motion and legal memoranda, th

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS MARY GEIGER LEWIS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs filed this case alleging claims for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, declaratory judgment, and trademark cancellation under federal law and claims of trademark infringement, breach of contract, conversion, violation of the South Carolina

686 F.Supp.2d 655 (2010) Henry S. SCHARPENBERG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert S. CARRINGTON, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:09cv1058 (GBL). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. February 12, 2010. *656 Betty S.W. Graumlich, Reed Smith LLP, Richmond, VA, Richard Cyril Sullivan, Jr., Reed Smith LLP, Fall

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: FACEBOOK, INC. No. 22-15077 SECURITIES LITIGATION, ______________________________ D.C. No. 5:18-cv- 01725-EJD AMALGAMATED BANK, Lead Plaintiff; PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OPINION MISSISSIPPI; JAMES KACOURIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. (Dkt. Nos. 6, 8, 17, 46, 57.) This case concerns Plaintiffs claim that Defendants are infringing his Canadian trademark Landcruise, Ltd. {“Landcruise”) used in conn

T.S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge Defendant, a German manufacturer of medicinal, cosmetic and dermatological products, filed an application with the United States Patent & Trademark Office ("PTO") Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") to register the mark VAGISAN for use on pharmaceutical and sanitary preparations in the United States. Plaintiff, a domestic manufacturer of competing products sold under the regist