Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Maggio v. Esposito”
United States v. Espositopublic domain
OPINION EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge. These eleven defendants are charged in a two-count indictment with conducting an illegal gambling business and conspiring to do so, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, sections 1955 and 371. They have made pretrial motions for severance, to strike alleged surplusage from the indictment, to suppress wiretap evidence, and for a hearing to determine the f
BD. OF TRUSTEES OF STATE UNIV. v. Espositopublic domain
991 So.2d 924 (2008) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY and The Florida State University, Appellants, v. John A. ESPOSITO, Appellee. No. 1D07-2316. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 15, 2008. Rehearing Denied October 16, 2008. *925 John S. Derr of John S. Derr, P.A., Tallahass
United States v. Espositopublic domain
423 F.Supp. 908 (1976) UNITED STATES of America v. Richard ESPOSITO, a/k/a "Dixon," et al., Defendants. No. 76 Cr. 1074. United States District Court, S. D. New York. December 21, 1976. *909 *910 Robert B. Fiske, Jr., U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y.; Michael D. Abzug, Sp. Atty., U. S. Dept. of Justic
Accuracy Firearms, LLC v. Pritzkerpublic domain
2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________
In Re Michelex Ltd.public domain
195 B.R. 993 (1996) In re MICHELEX LIMITED, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. GL 95-85578. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan. May 20, 1996. *994 *995 *996 Phillip J. Neuman, Troy, Michigan, for Pioneer Grain Company, Ltd. Samuel D. Sweet, Troy, Michigan, fo
Taylor v. Hornpublic domain
504 F.3d 416 (2007) Paul Gamboa TAYLOR, Appellant v. Martin HORN, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections; Gregory R. White, Superintendent of SCI Pittsburgh; Joseph Mazurkiewicz, Superintendent of SCI Rockview. No. 04-9016. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued October 18, 2006. Filed September 20, 2007.
Taylor v. Hornpublic domain
Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-20-2007 Taylor v. Horn Precedential or Non-Precedentia
16 F.3d 1225NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit. Hugh A. FREEMAN, Petitioner/Appellant,v.Daniel R. MCBRIDE and the Indiana Attorney General,Respondents/Appellees. No. 93-1620. United States Court
Franklin v. Francispublic domain
997 F.Supp. 916 (1998) Jennie FRANKLIN, et al., Petitioners, v. Rodney L. FRANCIS, Respondent. No. C1-98-0136. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 27, 1998. *917 *918 J. Joseph Bodine, Jr., Jonathan A. Woodman, Ohio Public Defender Com'n, Columbus, OH, Laurence
Demers v. Statepublic domain
Callahan, J. The state has filed the instant appeal from a judgment of the trial court granting the petition of Mark Demers and William J. Corcoran, Jr., for a new trial pursuant to General Statutes § 52-2701 and Practice Book § 902.2 In a joint trial, Demers and Corcoran previously had been convicted of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §
CARNES, Circuit Judge: This case is an appeal by two defendants from convictions for conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute, conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance with intent to distribute, and the use of a telephone to facilitate the manufacture and distribution of such substances. In March 1988, Appellant Cha
Pitts v. Redmanpublic domain
776 F.Supp. 907 (1991) Courtland C. PITTS, Petitioner, v. Walter W. REDMAN, Warden, Delaware Correctional Center, and Charles M. Oberly, III, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Respondents. Civ. A. No. 89-91-JRR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. November 7, 1991. *908 *909
United States v. Villegaspublic domain
899 F.2d 1324 58 USLW 2609 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Ricardo VILLEGAS, Carlos Gomez-Sanchez, Cesar Garcia-Marin,Pedro Jaramaillo, Jaime Cortez, Johana Torrez, John Berrio,Meliton Valbuena, Harold Gomez, Martin Bolivar, HeribertoTorrez, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 477, 571, 478, 500, 479, 480, 484, 481 to 483 and 508,Dockets 89-1089, 89-1090 and 89-1092 to 89-1
United States v. Villegaspublic domain
KEARSE, Circuit Judge: Defendants Ricardo Villegas, Carlos Gomez-Sanehez (“Gomez-Sanchez”), Cesar Garcia-Marin (“Garcia”), Pedro Jaramaillo, Jaime Cortez, Johana Torrez, John Berrio, Meliton Valbuena, Harold Gomez (“Gomez”), Martin Bolivar, and Heriberto Tor-rez appeal from final judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, after a jury trial before Con. G. Cholakis, Judg
United States of America Ex Rel. Lawrence Smith, Cross v. James W. Fairman and Neil F. Hartigan, Cross-Appelleespublic domain
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Respondents appeal from the district court’s order granting petitioner Lawrence Smith’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the State violated the dictates of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), by failing to provide petitioner with a police firearms worksheet prior to his trial. Petiti
United States v. Barbonepublic domain
McLAUGHLlN, Circuit Judge. Appellants together with seven other persons were charged in a four count indictment with conspiracy to operate, etc., as well as the substantive crime of operating an illicit still.1 *630During the trial, three of the defendants, Carmen Bruno, Samuel Coraluzzo and Albert Marzullo were acquitte
United States v. Barbonepublic domain
283 F.2d 628 UNITED STATES of America,v.Nicholas BARBONE, Appellant in No. 13,189,Albert Di Michele, Appellant in No. 13,190,Ignatius Esposito, Appellant in No. 13,191,Michael Pisano, Appellant in No. 13,192,Louis Diccio, Appellant in No. 13,193,Michael Lettera, Appellant in No. 13,194,Joseph Pagano, Appellant in No. 13,195. Nos. 13189-13195. United States Court of A