⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Mackenzie v. Townsend”

Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988-11-08 · Published · cited 0× · 173 Mich. App. 15; 433 N.W.2d 374
Per Curiam. Plaintiff appeals by leave granted from an opinion and order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board reducing from $22,500 to $1,500 the amount of penalties owed her for defendant employer’s failure to pay compensation benefits. We reverse. Plaintiff injured her back in 1979 while working for defendant. By a decision dated February 3, 1982, and mailed March 11, 1982, she was granted an open award of
District Court, D. Maine · 1965-12-14 · Published · cited 7× · 248 F. Supp. 496; 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6026
248 F.Supp. 496 (1965) Kenneth MacKENZIE, Petitioner, v. Allan L. ROBBINS, Warden, Maine State Prison, Respondent. Civ. No. 8-189. United States District Court D. Maine, S. D. December 14, 1965. *497 Gene Carter, Bangor, Maine, for petitioner. John W. Benoit, Asst. Atty. Gen., Augusta, Maine, for respondent. GIGNOUX
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1901-06-13 · Published · cited 48× · 49 A. 629; 93 Md. 537; 1901 Md. LEXIS 56
This case presents questions of more than usual interest and importance, but we think principles enunciated in comparatively recent decisions of this Court must so far control its decision as to render the solution of these questions free from difficulty. The facts giving rise to this litigation are as follows. The appellants (who were plaintiffs below) are the owners in fee of a lot of ground fronting about forty-nine feet on the south side of Fayette street in the city of Baltimore, and run
Michigan Supreme Court · 1962-05-17 · Published · cited 14× · 115 N.W.2d 270; 366 Mich. 430
366 Mich. 430 (1962) 115 N.W.2d 270 CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK v. GRANT-MACKENZIE COMPANY. Docket No. 63, Calendar No. 48,899. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided May 17, 1962. Colin J. McRae, City Attorney, and George W. Moore, Assistant City Attorney, for plaintiff. Albert L. Lieberman and Martin M. Miller, for
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929-05-01 · Published · cited 23× · 147 S.E. 829; 197 N.C. 152; 64 A.L.R. 1047; 1929 N.C. LEXIS 175
This action was instituted by the American Blower Company to recover the sum of $5,422.10 with interest from 31 August, 1926, alleged to be due for appliances and equipment sold to the defendant. It was alleged in the complaint that the defendant was indebted in large amounts to sundry other creditors; that he was insolvent, and that the administration of his estate demanded the appointment of a receiver. Other creditors were given leave to join in the suit. Upon admission of all the allegati
Ball v. Townsendpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924-04-25 · Published · cited 10× · 125 A. 758; 145 Md. 589; 1924 Md. LEXIS 86
The bill in this case was filed by the executors and trustees under the will of John W. Grace, deceased, in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City, to have construed certain items of said will. John W. Grace, of Baltimore City, died after the death of his wife, on or about the 26th day of May, 1919, leaving no father or mother, children or descendants surviving him, but leaving surviving him one brother of the whole blood, and children of a brother and three sisters of the half blood, who
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924-06-02 · Published · cited 2× · 1 F.2d 18; 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 1776
HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). [1, 2,] It must be emphasized that this appeal has vacated the decree of the District Court and that the case is hero tried de novo (the John Twohy, 255 U. S. 77-79, 41 Sup. Ct. 251, 65 L. Ed. 511), although such new trial is conducted in accordance with our own rules. We have recently considered at length the rights of stipulators for value in suits in rem (The Cartona, 29
Gore v. . Townsendpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1890-02-05 · Published · cited 26× · 11 S.E. 160; 105 N.C. 228
* Head-notes by AVERY, J. The mortgage was executed to secure a note for $750, dated 19th of March, 1884, and was made the same day, and in addition to the land conveyed therein, which was the individual property of D. L. (229) Townsend, two mules and one wagon were also mortgaged therein to secure said debt, which was the individual debt of said Townsend; one of the mules died subsequently. The land was acquired by D.
Howard v. Hughespublic domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 2018-10-04 · Published · cited 1× · 427 P.3d 1045
By the Court, GIBBONS, J.: In this proceeding, we are asked to clarify the property interest presumptions outlined in Sack v. Tomlin, 110 Nev. 204, 871 P.2d 298 (1994), and Langevin v. York,
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017-04-21 · Published · cited 89× · 854 F.3d 765; 2017 WL 1428959
JAMES L. DENNIS, Circuit Judge: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought this enforcement action against Life Partners Holdings, Inc. (LPHI) and two of its senior officers, Brian Pardo and Scott Peden, alleging violations of reporting and anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws. LPHI is in the business of facilitating the sales of existing life insurance p
Yelp Inc. v. Paxtonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-05-15 · Published · cited 22× · 137 F.4th 944
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT YELP INC., No. 24-581 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-04977- TLT v. KEN PAXTON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of OPINION Texas, Defendant - Appellee.
H.C. v. NYC DOEpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-06-21 · Published · cited 53× · 71 F.4th 120
21-1582 et al. H.C. v. NYC DOE, et al. In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2022 No. 21-1582 H.C., INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF J.C., A CHILD WITH A DISABILITY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTM
Nevada Supreme Court · 2003-07-10 · Published · cited 10× · 71 P.3d 1269; 119 Nev. 277; 119 Nev. Adv. Rep. 34; 2003 Nev. LEXIS 40
71 P.3d 1269 (2003) Honorable Kenny GUINN, Governor of the State of Nevada, Petitioner, v. The LEGISLATURE OF The STATE OF NEVADA; Honorable Lorraine T. Hunt, President of the Senate; Honorable Richard D. Perkins, Speaker of the Assembly; Mark E. Amodei, Senator; Terry Care, Senator; Maggie Carlton, Senator; Barbara Cegavske, Senator; Bob Coffin, Senator; Warren B. Hardy, Senator; Bernice Mathews, Senator; Mike McGinness, Senator; Joseph M. Neal,
Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-10-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHN KIRBY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. K22A-02-003 NEP ) THE KENT COUNTY BOARD ) OF ADJUSTMENT, ) )
Nevada Supreme Court · 2003-09-17 · Published · cited 14× · 76 P.3d 22; 119 Nev. 460; 119 Nev. Adv. Rep. 52; 2003 Nev. LEXIS 65
76 P.3d 22 (2003) Honorable Kenny GUINN, Governor of the State of Nevada, Petitioner, v. The LEGISLATURE OF the STATE OF NEVADA; Honorable Lorraine T. Hunt, President of the Senate; Honorable Richard D. Perkins, Speaker of the Assembly; Mark E. Amodei, Senator; Terry Care, Senator; Maggie Carlton, Senator; Barbara Cegavske, Senator; Bob Coffin, Senator; Warren B. Hardy, Senator; Bernice Mathews, Senator; Mike McGinness, Senator; Joseph M. Neal, J
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Mar 28 2018, 6:30 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Co
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2016-07-14 · Published · cited 0× · 127 Fed. Cl. 565; 2016 U.S. Claims LEXIS 951; 2016 WL 3886291
Patent Infringement; Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (Subject Matter Jurisdiction). MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS THE OCTOBER 6, 2015 COMPLAINTS SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge I. RELEVANT FAC
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-12-11 · Published · cited 8× · 944 F.3d 975
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3755 ___________________________ Keller Farms, Inc. Plaintiff - Appellant v. McGarity Flying Service, LLC; Dennis E. McGarity; Michael C. Pemberton; John
People v. Whitepublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979-05-01 · Published · cited 4× · 282 N.W.2d 200; 89 Mich. App. 726; 1979 Mich. App. LEXIS 2120
89 Mich. App. 726 (1979) 282 N.W.2d 200 PEOPLE v. WHITE Docket No. 77-3980. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided May 1, 1979. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Edward R. Wilson, Principal Attorney, Appeals, and Anne B. Wetherholt,<
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-02-25 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Feb 25 2019, 9:25 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court