Cases

FINDINGS AND ORDER IN RE CAUSATION J. THOMAS GREENE, District Judge. This matter is before the court on remand by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for determination of causation of injury to plaintiff Steiner Corporation (“Steiner”) and the damages, if any, resulting from professional negligence by Defendant Johnson & Higgins (“J & H”). J & H was Steiner’s act

840 F.Supp. 869 (1993) Ed Peter MACK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RUSSELL COUNTY COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 89-T-459-E. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, E.D. December 21, 1993. *870 James U. Blacksher, John C. Falkenberry, Leslie Proll, Edward Still, Birmingham, AL, Julius L. Chambers, Dana Cunningham, New

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF COURT KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge. I. SYNOPSIS This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 36). Plaintiff Charles Mack, a federal inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Loretto, Pennsylvania (“FCI Loretto”), seeks damages resulting from alleged incidents of rel

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-21-00083-CV DON MICHAEL HIGGINS AND JANET HIGGINS, Appellants v. CHARLES H. CROWELL, TERESA H. CROWELL, AND CAMP CREEK WATER COMPANY, Appellees From the 82nd District Court Robertson County, Texas Trial Court No. 19-04-2

MEMORANDUM SURRICK, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Defendants Mack Trucks, Inc. and Volvo Group North America, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 20.) For the following reasons, the Motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND A. The Parties 1. Plaintiff Bruce Andersen Plaintiff Bruce Andersen

991 So.2d 479 (2008) Clinton MACK and Effie Mack v. Dorothy WILEY and American National Property and Casualty Company. No. 2007 CA 2344. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. May 2, 2008. *483 Vincent L. Bowers, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants, Clinton and Effie Mack. Arthur H. Andrews, Baton Rouge, LA, f

578 F.Supp. 626 (1983) James W. MACK, Jr. v. W.R. GRACE COMPANY; Vic Annapole, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Plant Manager; and Edward Kinsel, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Supervisor of Quality Control. Civ. No. C82-561. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. October 13, 1983. *627</

NO. 07-07-0377-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D JANUARY 9, 2009 ______________________________

NO. 07-07-0377-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D JANUARY 9, 2009 ______________________________ DEW EY MACK EVANS, APPELLANT

NO. 07-07-0377-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D JANUARY 9, 2009 ______________________________ DEWEY MACK EVA

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioners seek review of a decision of the Board denying them claims for employee service under the RRA. Employee Service Determination DJH, MH, TN, BR, LCS, AGT, No. B.C.D. 05-48 (Railroad Retirement Bd. Nov. 8, 2005), http://www.rrb.gov/blaw/bcd/bcd05-48.htm, aff'd on reh’g, No. B.C.D. 06-24 (Railroad Retirement Bd. June 6, 2006), http://www.rrb.gov/pdf/bcd/bcd06-24.pdf, and No. B.C.D. 06-39 (Railroad R

884 P.2d 1242 (1994) STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Pamela Malan HIGGINS, Defendant and Petitioner. No. 920494. Supreme Court of Utah. November 10, 1994. *1243 R. Paul Van Dam, Atty. Gen., Todd A. Utzinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff. Lisa J. Remal, Joan C. Watt, Salt Lake City, for defend

662 N.W.2d 387 (2003) 255 Mich. App. 83 HIGGINS LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, and John Doering, John Smith, Mary Smith, William Sharp, Arlean Sharp, Gary W. Wilson, Jean Wilson, Timothy J. Pipkins, Doris Pipkins, John Wade, and Elizabeth Wade, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellees, v. GERRISH TOWNSHIP, Roscommon County Road Commission, and Department of Natural Resources, Defendants-Appelle

86 Cal.App.2d 723 (1948) MACK McNEIL et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE D. HIGGINS, Appellant. Civ. No. 16339. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two. July 13, 1948. George D. Higgins, in pro. per., and John F. Poole for Appellant. W. L. Pollard for Respondents. MOORE, P. J. The judgment entered was in treble damages by reason of

Shea, J. After a jury trial the defendant was convicted of felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c.1 On appeal he claims the trial court erred: (1) in denying his motion to separate his grand jury proceeding from that of his codefendant; (2) in excluding evidence of the circumstances of a crime committed by the codefendant, who testified for the prosecution, claimed to have been simil

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Steiner Corporation, along with others not parties to this appeal, brought this action against defendants in 1988 for professional malpractice and breach of contract. Defendant Johnson & Higgins (sometimes referred to herein as J & H) is the actuarial firm which handled aspects of plaintiffs employee retirement plan. Defendants Reeves and Bertoldo were the individual members of John

135 F.3d 684 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 2313,Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23945M, 98 CJ C.A.R. 1231,98 CJ C.A.R. 425 STEINER CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation,Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant,andCarol S. McCormick, Administrator of the Steiner CorporationRetirement Plan, and Steiner CorporationRetirement Plan, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants,v.JOHNSON & HIGGINS OF CALIFORNIA, a Cali

582 F.2d 720 99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2013, 84 Lab.Cas. P 10,758 BROCKWAY MOTOR TRUCKS, DIVISION OF MACK TRUCKS, INC., Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 77-1974. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued March 28, 1978.Decided July 19, 1978. Wilb

31 Cal.App.2d 482 (1939) RUTH B. DeTRAY, Respondent, v. GEORGE P. HIGGINS et al., Appellants. Civ. No. 2211. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Appellate District. March 14, 1939. Borton, Petrini & Conron for Appellants. Brittan & Mack for Respondent. Griffin, J. This is a case in which Ruth B. DeTray, formerly Mrs. Newcomb, obta

Mack Higgins was convicted of the crime of larceny and sentenced to serve a term of ten years in the state penitentiary. Motion for new trial was filed, considered, overruled, and defendant gave notice of appeal. The case-made shows that sentence was imposed on the defendant on November 30, 1935. The case was filed in this court on July 14, 1936, more than six months after the date of the sentence. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss, on the ground that the case was not