Cases

MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE *777At the time General Motors Corporation ("Old GM") filed for bankruptcy on June 1, 2009, it was believed that the defendants in this action, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the agent bank and a term lender) and various other financial institutions (collectively, the "Term Lenders") held a fully secur

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, Glenna Bryan, appeals as of right an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant, JPMorgan Chase Bank, in this quiet title action. Finding no errors warranting reversal, we affirm. I. BASIC FACTS The trial court’s order granting summary disposition for defendant set forth the background facts of this case, none of which is in dispute:

536 U.S. 88 (2002) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK v. TRAFFIC STREAM (BVI) INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. No. 01-651. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 17, 2002. Decided June 10, 2002. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT *89 Souter, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jason S. Dionne, et al. v. Civil No. 15-cv-056-LM Opinion No. 2016 DNH 093 Federal National Mortgage Association and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. O R D E R Plaintiffs originally filed this mortgage foreclosure dispute in the New Hampshire Superior Court, Hillsborough County, Souther

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TANGIERS DRIVE TRUST, No. 78564 Appellant, vs. rr- lei L-7. 4,1—Z

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA CYPRESS MANOR DRIVE TRUST, No. 78849 Appellant, vs. 17- L Be. THE FOOTHILLS AT MACDONALD RANCH MASTER ASSOCIATION, A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTOPHER EARL PEEK, Pro se Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-cv-658 (CRC) SUNTRUST BANK, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Christopher Earl Peek has been trying since 2014 to thwart SunTrust Bank (“SunTrust”) from foreclosing on his home. Peek f

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee for the No. 17-16399 Specialty Underwriting and Residential Finance Trust Mortgage D.C. No. Loan Asset-Backed Certificates 3:16-cv-00501- Series 2006-BC4, RCJ-WGC Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ORDER CERTIFYING THUNDER

Bank of Am., N.A. v Kljajic (2019 NY Slip Op 00087) Bank of Am., N.A. v Kljajic 2019 NY Slip Op 00087 Decided on January 9, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pur

ORDER REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on “Defendants OneWest, MERS, and Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment and to Dissolve Injunction” (Dkt. # 172), “Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. # 176), and defendants’ “Motion to Supplement Record in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judg

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt 47) MARK A. GOLDSMITH, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This is a mortgage foreclosure case. In their second amended complaint, Plaintiffs Troy and Lea Etts accuse Defendants of fraudulent misrepresentation and promissory estoppel based on alleged promises to (i) review Plaintiffs’ financ

*588 OPINION MARC W. BROWN, Justice. This case arises out of a home-equity loan obtained by appellants Alice M. Wood and Daniel L. Wood in 2004 that encumbered their homestead with a lien. The Woods appeal the summary judgment granted in favor of appellees HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and O

Chapter 7 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER (I) GRANTING TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO BANKRUPTCY RULE 7056 AND (II) DENYING THE REQUEST OF THE TRUSTEE AND CHASE FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST JACKMAN Burton R. Lifland, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment (the “Motion”) pursuant to

SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign

STEPHENS, J. In this receiver action, third-party plaintiffs, Church & Church, Inc., doing business as Church’s Lumber Yards and Church’s Builder Wholesale (collectively, Church), appeal as of right the trial court order granting summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) to third-party defendants, JPMorgan Chase Bank, Bank of America, U.S. Bank, Hong Doan,

JY Not So Common L.P. v P & R Bronx, LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 23122) [*1] JY Not So Common L.P. v P & R Bronx, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 23122 Decided on April 26, 2023 Supreme Court, Bronx County Gomez, J.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE DAVID M. LAWSON, United States Distinct Judge Plaintiffs Cosme and Shirleann Cruz filed this action alleging that defendant Capital One, N.A. wrongfully foreclosed the mortgage on their family home to enforce collection of a delinquent promissory note. They identified six causes of action in their complaint. The defendant,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas A. Varían, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This civil matter is before- the Court on defendant Gerald Hannahs’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 95],1 Underwriter Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 96],2 and individual defendants McPeak, Turkleson, Schlumberger, Gower, Leary, Stivers, Hall, Richardson, and Rector’s Mo

Opinion FYBEL, J.— Introduction Nautilus, Inc. (Nautilus), obtained a judgment against Stanley Kuo Hua Yang, and recorded an abstract of judgment against real property on which Stanley and his brother, Peter Chun Hua Yang, held title. 1 Stanley and Peter transferred title on the

ORDER JULIAN ABELE COOK, JR., District Judge. The Plaintiff, Bruce Backhaus, filed this action against the Defendant, General Motors LLC (“GM”), alleging that it had violated his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, and Michigan’s Persons With Disabilities Civil Rights Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1101 (“PWDCRA”). His amended complaint alleges that GM (1) refu