Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ma v. Rise Huge Corporation Ltd.”
Ameritox, Ltd. v. Millennium Laboratories, Inc.public domain
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: In this three-year high-stakes litigation — a case that “[t]he [medical] industry is watching,” Ameritox assured the jury— the parties tried various state statutory and common law unfair competition claims predicated upon the alleged violation of two federal statutes that provide no private right of action. The parties, however, did not realize that it was
Frank J. Bailey, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION By its 16-count complaint in this adversary proceeding, plaintiff and reorganized chapter 11 debtor BT Prime Ltd. ("BT Prime," "the Debtor," or "the plaintiff"), formerly a currency trading business, seeks against the four defendants, each an affiliate of BT Prime, to avoid and recover fraudulent and preferential transfers, recover dam
Pernix Ir. Pain Dac v. Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd.public domain
WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE *572BACKGROUND This is a Hatch-Waxman Act case. The plaintiffs, Pernix Ireland Pain DAC and Pernix Therapeutics, LLC, (collectively, "Pernix") have sued the defendant, Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd. ("Alvogen") for patent infringement under
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) commenced this action on October 9, 2013, alleging violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 thereunder;1 Section 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)(1), (3); and Section 5 of the Securitie
OPINION Christopher S. Sontchi, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge INTRODUCTION The Court now rules on four related motions in this adversary proceeding. The plaintiff, George R. Miller, as Chapter 7 Trustee for the estates of NewStarcom Holdings, Inc., et al. (the “Trustee”), claims that each defendant owed a fiduciary duty to one or more of the Debtors, and each def
ACCEPTED 05-15-01513-CV 05-15-01513-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/11/2015 4:54:22 PM
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 25-78C (Filed under seal: July 24, 2025) (Filed: August 1, 2025) ) TISTA SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ) CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, )
No. 01-14-00707-CV IN THE FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 10/30/2015 1:52:16 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE at HOUSTON, TEXAS Clerk –––––––––
Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. v. Tellabs, Inc.public domain
735 F.Supp.2d 856 (2010) MAKOR ISSUES & RIGHTS, LTD., Chris Broholm, Richard LeBrun, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TELLABS, INC., Michael J. Birck, Richard C. Notebaert, et al., Defendants. Case No. 02 C 4356. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 13, 2010. *861 Carla Fredericks, Richard H. Weiss, Mil
Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. v. Tellabs Inc.public domain
513 F.3d 702 (2008) MAKOR ISSUES & RIGHTS, LTD., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TELLABS INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-1687. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 1, 2007. Decided January 17, 2008. *703 *704 Richard H. Weis
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
Select Building Systems, Inc. and Tri-Bar Ranch Company, Ltd. v. Robertson Electric, Inc.public domain
FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD
E. Ohman J:or Fonder Ab v. Nvidia Corporationpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT E. OHMAN J:OR FONDER AB; No. 21-15604 STICHTING PENSIOENFONDS PGB, Lead Plaintiffs, D.C. No. 4:18-cv- 07669-HSG Plaintiffs-Appellants, and OPINION IRON WORKERS LOCAL 580 JOINT FUNDS, Plaintiff, v. NVIDIA CORPORATION; JENSEN HUANG; COLETTE KRESS; JEFF FISHER, Defendants-Appel
McNamara v. Bre-X Minerals Ltd.public domain
197 F.Supp.2d 622 (2001) Lane MCNAMARA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BRE-X MINERALS LTD., Bresea Resources, Ltd., John B. Felderhof, Estate of David G. Walsh, T. Stephen McAnulty, John B. Thorpe, Rolando C. Francisco, Hugh C. Lyons, Paul M. Kavanaugh, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., P.T. Kilborn Pakar Rekayasa, Kilborn Engineering Pacific, Ltd., SNC-Lavalin, Inc., Nesbit Burns, Inc., Lehman Brothers, Inc., Barrick Gold Corporation, Defendants.
460 F.Supp.2d 1222 (2006) G.K. LAS VEGAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership, Plaintiff, v. SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation; Simon Property Group, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership; M.S. Management Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation doing business as Simon Management Company; SDG Forum Associates *1223 Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership; SPG Forum
the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Zachry Construction Corporationpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM
ACCEPTED 15-25-00207-CV Cause No. _________ FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/14/2025 4:30 PM I
960 F.2d 1080 15 Employee Benefits Cas. 1187 UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, etal., Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.163 PLEASANT STREET CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, Appellees,International Twist Drill (Holdings), Limited, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, etal., Plaintiffs, Appellants,v.163 PLEASANT STREET CORPORATION, et al
Gentile v. Turkolypublic domain
[Cite as Gentile v. Turkoly, 2017-Ohio-1018.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT RICHARD D. GENTILE, M.D., ) CASE NO. 16 MA 0071 ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ) ) VS. ) OPI
Alsa Corp. v. PPG Industries, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This action arises out of the negotiation, execution, and subsequent termination of a 1997 agreement (“Agreement”) between the plaintiff, Alsa Corporation d/b/a Alsa Refinish (“Alsa”), and the defendant, PPG Industries, Inc. (“PPG”), regarding the