Cases

The opinion of the court was delivered by LONG, J.A.D. Plaintiff Essex County Division of Welfare, as assignee of Loretha Jarido, appeals from an order of the trial judge directing defendant Leotis Walker to pay a total of $12.00 per week in support for Jarido’s two illegitimate children, paternity of whom Walker has admitted. In addition to the insufficiency of the support order, plaintiff claims that th

VILLANUEVA, J.S.C. After welfare recipients’ attorney received settlement proceeds for clients’ personal injury law suits, which proceedings were concealed from the welfare agency so that no agreements to repay existed, this declaratory judgment action was commenced seeking to have the agency’s claims for recoupment limited to the amount of assistance paid on behalf of plaintiffs as if their children had not been included in t

ACCEPTED 15-24-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/2025 6:14 PM No. 15-24-00120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Carol Ann Conforti v. County of Ocean (A-1-22) (086206) Argued January 30, 2023 -- Decided August 10, 2023 WAINER APTER, J., writing for the Court. The Court considers whether the Ocean Coun

178 N.J. Super. 523 (1981) 429 A.2d 609 ESSEX COUNTY DIVISION OF WELFARE, AS ASSIGNEE OF CELOUISE SOUTHERLAND, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. KEVIN JAMES SIMON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted March 30, 1981. Decided April 21, 1981. *524 Before Judges MICHELS, KOL

The opinion of the court was delivered by AXELRAD, P.J.A.D. In this appeal, we address the trial court’s sua sponte dismissal of an abuse or neglect complaint filed by the Division of Youth and Family Services (the Division)1 in the interim between the close of its presentation of evidence and the scheduled return date for defense witness testimony, without notice to the parties o

JAMES R. EYLER, Judge. The question presented by this case is whether the State Department of Health and Mental Hygiene violated State or federal law when it utilized Social Security benefits, payable to an individual committed to a State hospital, to pay current charges for that inpatient care. We find a violation of federal law and, as a result, shall reverse the decision of the Circuit Court for Howard County.

483 F.Supp. 357 (1979) Carrie MOORE et al. v. Aldo COLAUTTI et al. Lorraine TILFORD et al. v. Aldo COLAUTTI et al. Carmen Torres, Ruby Washington, Intervening Plaintiffs. Civ. A. Nos. 75-1314, 75-2395. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. November 19, 1979. As Amended December 4, 1979. *358<

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) In the Matter of the New Jersey Firemen’s Association Obligation to Provide Relief Applications

158 N.J. Super. 68 (1978) 385 A.2d 867 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LOUIS MOORE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted October 3, 1977. Decided March 29, 1978. *72 Before Judges FRITZ, BOTTER and ARD. Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

Lenk, J. We are called upon in these consolidated cases to construe G. L. c. 148, § 261, the residential sprinkler provision, one of a number of provisions requiring the installation of automatic sprinkler systems contained in G. L. c. 148, the fire prevention act. The residential sprinkler provision mandates the installation of automatic sprinklers in new residential buildings of f

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

FILED MARCH 15, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WA

MEMORANDUM JONES, II, District Judge. In their Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs allege violations of (1) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”); (2) 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (3) the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA”); (4) the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 P.S. § 955 et seq. (“PHRA”); and (5)

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

614 F.2d 872 103 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2482, 88 Lab.Cas. P 11,839,2 Employee Benefits Ca 1126 AMAX COAL COMPANY, a Division of Amax, Inc., Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,United Mine Workers of America, Local No. 1854, and UnitedMine Workers of America, Intervenors.UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL NO. 1854 and UnitedMine Workers of America, Petitioners,v.NATIONA

Spain, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (McCarthy, J.), entered October 16, 2006 in Albany County, which granted a motion by defendants City of Watervliet, City of Watervliet Board of Appeals and Mark R. Gilchrist for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. Plaintiff is the owner of a large commercial building located in the City of Watervliet, Albany County, in a manufacturing zo

770 A.2d 723 (2001) Gerald McCANN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CLERK OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, Defendant-Respondent, and Louis Manzo, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued telephonically March 29, 2001. Decided April 3, 2001. *725 Karen F. DeSoto, for intervenor-appellant Loui